Rovio: Console Games Are Dying

March 14, 2011 -

Forget about PC gaming being dead, now some are saying that console gaming is dead instead. Rovio head Peter Vesterbacka says that "console games are dying" and that innovation in gaming has shifted to the mobile and social space. The comments came about during a panel discussion at the South by Southwest Interactive conference in Austin, Texas. Vesterbacka added that innovation is possbile in the social and mobile space because companies are more "nimble" and release content quickly.

"As mobile gaming - including games on tablet devices like the iPad - continues to grow, console games are "dying," he said.

Vesterbacka also took a shot at Nintendo boss Satoru Iwata's GDC comments, pointing out that the traditional model where companies charge $40 to $50 for a game that's "difficult to upgrade" no longer works.

Vesterbacka added that the key for his company is to continue experimenting and not become attached to any particular model.

That may prove to be difficult when the admiration and excitement for its marquee title, Angry Birds wears off.

Last week Rovio secured an impressive $42 million, but where the company goes after Angry Birds is a big question mark. That talk of innovation will certainly be put to the test.

Source: Venture Beat

 


Comments

Re: Rovio: Console Games Are Dying

inflammatory, self-serving and transparent lies (I mean, strategic marketing!) from someone in direct competition with consoles... hmm, why am i not surprised?

if this guy doesn't understand gamers, how can he possibly predict their future? even non-gamers know that 'core' gamers are ferociously loyal and have lots of disposable income. casual gamers are fickle with their loyalty and money - they can show up en masse and take off en masse with no monetary or ideological investment to keep them engaged. no one calls casual gaming a hobby! no one is passionate about casual gaming other than casual gaming devs!

I'm not saying games should be expensive but there's a reason why Black Ops is the best selling game in history despite a $60 price tag during a bad economy. it's also the dynamic that makes big budget SFX films successful and why low budget horror flicks get panned by everyone except those who benefit from the meager profits they make with little risk or initial investment - would you rather be guaranteed to make 5% on your small investment or risk 50%-or-nothing on a larger, riskier investment? these d-bag suits don't want to think so they take the lazy road and then we all suffer. but the big budget SFX flicks aren't going anywhere. why? the insatiable fans.

who will save zynga if facebook becomes unpopular like myspace? the fans? Will the farmville players on FB flock to wherever farmville goes? doubtful. how much 'success' would rovio have if they didn't give away angry birds for free on so many platforms? casual gaming is only about convenience and immediacy, if either of those conditions are false, they're not going to play anymore. a core gamer will call into work sick on the day a Halo sequel is released - which casual games can illicit that kind of response?

this guy is either lying through his teeth or is clueless but definitely full of unjustified hubris.

Re: Rovio: Console Games Are Dying

Just because a million grandmothers are willing to spend their medication money on Angry Birds and Farmville doesn't mean that there aren't gamers out there wanting games on consoles with more substance.

-Ultimately what will do in mankind is a person's fear of their own freedom-

Re: Rovio: Console Games Are Dying

There are still milloins more spent on console games than anything else.


I have a dream, break the chains of copy right oppression! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/2010/05/21/cigital-disobedience/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: Rovio: Console Games Are Dying

You may have made a succesful mobile game Rovio but that dosen't mean you get to be cocky; that's reserved for those that makes 5 succesful mobile games.

http://www.magicinkgaming.com/

Re: Rovio: Console Games Are Dying

There's at least some degree of soundness in the "console games are harder to patch" argument, although this is due more to the policies of console manufacturers than to any inherent weakness in console gaming. Compare the PC and Xbox 360 versions of Monday Night Combat to see what I mean.

Re: Rovio: Console Games Are Dying

Very much this, Techno.

Console gaming, much like PC gaming, is FAR from dying.  Hell, the Kinect is helping Microsoft move MORE 360s than ever before. 

Re: Rovio: Console Games Are Dying

Or the PC and console versions of Team Fortress 2.

Re: Rovio: Console Games Are Dying

Over the last 20 years, the following things have been proclaimed to be dead, multiple times:

- Personal Computers

- PC Gaming

- Console Gaming

- Western-developed games

- Mobile games

- Japanese games

- Disc-based games

 

Funny where we are now.   

Re: Rovio: Console Games Are Dying

If Rovio makes another game even close to as good and successful as Angry Birds, then maybe, maybe, they will be worth listening to.

But if they can't repeat their success, it means they got lucky... and if that's the case, listening to them proclaim the end of console gaming is like listening to a lottery winner tell you that "the economy is doing fine!".

Re: Rovio: Console Games Are Dying

Don't forget that in the list of the dead, there is also: Disco, God, and Music:)

Not that I believe consoles will die, but it is alot more possible that mobile gaming takes some of the consoles market as it grows. Kinda like when Linux got going.

Re: Rovio: Console Games Are Dying

sgifted?

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

How do you usually divide up your Humble Bundle payments?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Matthew Wilsonthe lose of nn would not be good for us, but it will not be good for verizion/comcast/att in the long run ether.04/24/2014 - 2:16pm
Matthew Wilsonsadly yes. it would take another sopa day to achieve it.04/24/2014 - 2:13pm
NeenekoI am also confused. Are you saying NN would only become law if Google/Netflix pushed the issue (against their own interests)?04/24/2014 - 2:10pm
E. Zachary KnightMatthew, you are saying a lot of things but I am still unclear on your point. Are you saying that the loss of Net Neutrality will be good in the long run?04/24/2014 - 2:06pm
Matthew WilsonOfcourse it does I never said it did not.though over time the death of NN will make backbone providers like Google, level3 and others stronger becouse most isps including the big ones can not provid internet without them. they can peer with smaller isps04/24/2014 - 1:54pm
E. Zachary KnightMatthew, and that still plays in Google's favor over their smaller rivals who don't have the muscle to stand up to ISPs.04/24/2014 - 1:45pm
Matthew Wilsongoogle wont pay becouse they control a large part of the backbone that all isps depend on. if verizon blocks their data, google does the same. the effect is Verizon loses access to 40% of the internet, and can not serve some areas at all.04/24/2014 - 1:14pm
Neenekolack of NN is in google and netflix interest. It is another tool for squeezing out smaller companies since they can afford to 'play'04/24/2014 - 12:57pm
Matthew WilsonI have said it before net nutrality will not be made in to law until Google or Netflix is blocked, or they do what they did for sopa and pull their sites down in protest.04/23/2014 - 8:02pm
Andrew EisenGee, I guess putting a former cable industry lobbyist as the Chairman of the FCC wasn't that great of an idea. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/24/technology/fcc-new-net-neutrality-rules.html?_r=204/23/2014 - 7:26pm
Andrew EisenIanC - I assume what he's getting at is the fact that once PS3/360 development ceases, there will be no more "For Everything But Wii U" games.04/23/2014 - 5:49pm
Andrew EisenMatthew - Yes, obviously developers will eventually move on from the PS3 and 360 but the phrase will continue to mean exactly what it means.04/23/2014 - 5:45pm
IanCAnd how does that equal his annoying phrase being meaningless?04/23/2014 - 5:09pm
Matthew Wilson@Andrew Eisen the phrase everything but wiiu will be meaningless afer this year becouse devs will drop 360/ps3 support.04/23/2014 - 4:43pm
Andrew EisenFor Everything But... 360? Huh, not many games can claim that title. Only three others that I know of.04/23/2014 - 3:45pm
MaskedPixelantehttp://www.joystiq.com/2014/04/23/another-world-rated-for-current-consoles-handhelds-in-germany/ Another World fulfills legal obligations of being on every gaming system under the sun.04/23/2014 - 12:34pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://arstechnica.com/gaming/2014/04/steam-gauge-do-strong-reviews-lead-to-stronger-sales-on-steam/?comments=1 Here is another data driven article using sales data from steam to figure out if reviews effect sales. It is stats heavy like the last one.04/23/2014 - 11:33am
Andrew EisenI love RPGs but I didn't much care for Tales of Symphonia. I didn't bother with its sequel.04/23/2014 - 11:21am
InfophileIt had great RPGs because MS wanted to use them to break into Japan. (Which had the side-effect of screwing NA PS3 owners out of Tales of Vesperia. No, I'm not bitter, why do you ask?)04/23/2014 - 10:52am
RedMageI'm still disappointed the 360 never broke into Japan either. It had a bevy of great RPGs in the late 2000s.04/23/2014 - 9:48am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician