Rovio: Console Games Are Dying

March 14, 2011 -

Forget about PC gaming being dead, now some are saying that console gaming is dead instead. Rovio head Peter Vesterbacka says that "console games are dying" and that innovation in gaming has shifted to the mobile and social space. The comments came about during a panel discussion at the South by Southwest Interactive conference in Austin, Texas. Vesterbacka added that innovation is possbile in the social and mobile space because companies are more "nimble" and release content quickly.

"As mobile gaming - including games on tablet devices like the iPad - continues to grow, console games are "dying," he said.

Vesterbacka also took a shot at Nintendo boss Satoru Iwata's GDC comments, pointing out that the traditional model where companies charge $40 to $50 for a game that's "difficult to upgrade" no longer works.

Vesterbacka added that the key for his company is to continue experimenting and not become attached to any particular model.

That may prove to be difficult when the admiration and excitement for its marquee title, Angry Birds wears off.

Last week Rovio secured an impressive $42 million, but where the company goes after Angry Birds is a big question mark. That talk of innovation will certainly be put to the test.

Source: Venture Beat

 


Comments

Re: Rovio: Console Games Are Dying

inflammatory, self-serving and transparent lies (I mean, strategic marketing!) from someone in direct competition with consoles... hmm, why am i not surprised?

if this guy doesn't understand gamers, how can he possibly predict their future? even non-gamers know that 'core' gamers are ferociously loyal and have lots of disposable income. casual gamers are fickle with their loyalty and money - they can show up en masse and take off en masse with no monetary or ideological investment to keep them engaged. no one calls casual gaming a hobby! no one is passionate about casual gaming other than casual gaming devs!

I'm not saying games should be expensive but there's a reason why Black Ops is the best selling game in history despite a $60 price tag during a bad economy. it's also the dynamic that makes big budget SFX films successful and why low budget horror flicks get panned by everyone except those who benefit from the meager profits they make with little risk or initial investment - would you rather be guaranteed to make 5% on your small investment or risk 50%-or-nothing on a larger, riskier investment? these d-bag suits don't want to think so they take the lazy road and then we all suffer. but the big budget SFX flicks aren't going anywhere. why? the insatiable fans.

who will save zynga if facebook becomes unpopular like myspace? the fans? Will the farmville players on FB flock to wherever farmville goes? doubtful. how much 'success' would rovio have if they didn't give away angry birds for free on so many platforms? casual gaming is only about convenience and immediacy, if either of those conditions are false, they're not going to play anymore. a core gamer will call into work sick on the day a Halo sequel is released - which casual games can illicit that kind of response?

this guy is either lying through his teeth or is clueless but definitely full of unjustified hubris.

Re: Rovio: Console Games Are Dying

Just because a million grandmothers are willing to spend their medication money on Angry Birds and Farmville doesn't mean that there aren't gamers out there wanting games on consoles with more substance.

-Ultimately what will do in mankind is a person's fear of their own freedom-

Re: Rovio: Console Games Are Dying

There are still milloins more spent on console games than anything else.


I have a dream, break the chains of copy right oppression! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/2010/05/21/cigital-disobedience/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: Rovio: Console Games Are Dying

You may have made a succesful mobile game Rovio but that dosen't mean you get to be cocky; that's reserved for those that makes 5 succesful mobile games.

http://www.magicinkgaming.com/

Re: Rovio: Console Games Are Dying

There's at least some degree of soundness in the "console games are harder to patch" argument, although this is due more to the policies of console manufacturers than to any inherent weakness in console gaming. Compare the PC and Xbox 360 versions of Monday Night Combat to see what I mean.

Re: Rovio: Console Games Are Dying

Very much this, Techno.

Console gaming, much like PC gaming, is FAR from dying.  Hell, the Kinect is helping Microsoft move MORE 360s than ever before. 

Re: Rovio: Console Games Are Dying

Or the PC and console versions of Team Fortress 2.

Re: Rovio: Console Games Are Dying

Over the last 20 years, the following things have been proclaimed to be dead, multiple times:

- Personal Computers

- PC Gaming

- Console Gaming

- Western-developed games

- Mobile games

- Japanese games

- Disc-based games

 

Funny where we are now.   

Re: Rovio: Console Games Are Dying

If Rovio makes another game even close to as good and successful as Angry Birds, then maybe, maybe, they will be worth listening to.

But if they can't repeat their success, it means they got lucky... and if that's the case, listening to them proclaim the end of console gaming is like listening to a lottery winner tell you that "the economy is doing fine!".

Re: Rovio: Console Games Are Dying

Don't forget that in the list of the dead, there is also: Disco, God, and Music:)

Not that I believe consoles will die, but it is alot more possible that mobile gaming takes some of the consoles market as it grows. Kinda like when Linux got going.

Re: Rovio: Console Games Are Dying

sgifted?

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
InfophileSomething weird was going on with that comment. As soon as I posted it, it looked like it had replies from the past. And now I can't even find it. Ah well, it was getting off-topic for that thread anyway.10/01/2014 - 4:29am
Sleaker@CraigR been using Win8.1 for a while, I don't really see any usability difference between it and 7 (Work uses 7)10/01/2014 - 2:16am
Craig R.Ok, my internal debate was short-lived. If Win10 is still a year out, I'm not waiting that long for an SSD, so on Win7 I will remain.09/30/2014 - 7:52pm
Matthew Wilsonits called windows 10, and I am happy to get the start menu back.09/30/2014 - 7:18pm
Jessy HartIs this stuff about Windows 10 legit? Is it actually called Windows 10 or is it just some stupid joke?09/30/2014 - 6:57pm
ZippyDSMleeSo I been trying to play Bioshock Infinite I got all the DLC,ect but do not want the extras to make your charatcer over powered from the start.....they force you to take them which is quite annoying......09/30/2014 - 6:45pm
Craig R.I need to upgrade to an SSD, still seriously debating moving to Win8.1 from 7 at the same time09/30/2014 - 6:07pm
Craig R.Win10 is probably Win8.1 with more cleanup and the Start button back.09/30/2014 - 6:06pm
Sora-ChanAhh, it's just weird seeing someone's post all of a sudden have replies from days prior before it was posted due to that.09/30/2014 - 5:49pm
MechaTama31sora: I broke the ordering intentionally, as AE's and my conversation had squeezed the text boxes down to be quite slim. I replied to an earlier post of his instead of the one I was actually replying to.09/30/2014 - 5:46pm
MechaTama31So, 9 would have been the good one, but they are skipping it to do two crap ones in a row?09/30/2014 - 5:41pm
Sora-ChanSo, judging from the poll post for #gamergate, it looks like too many thread replies breaks the ordering of posts, as seen with the recent post from Infophile.09/30/2014 - 5:31pm
Andrew EisenOr no! It wasn't Y3K compliant. Microsoft thought it best to super future proof its OS and skipped straight to 10 which is Y3K compliant!09/30/2014 - 5:01pm
Andrew EisenJust tell them it wasn't Y2K compliant.09/30/2014 - 5:00pm
Craig R.Looking forward to having to explain to coworkers down the road what ever happened to 9 *sigh*09/30/2014 - 4:57pm
Craig R.2k was crap. XP was solid, 7 is good, 8.1 is actually really good once you make it look like 7 :)09/30/2014 - 4:52pm
Sora-Chan@MP As someone who has used each version of windows since 3.1... I prefer Vista over 7 for various reasons. The only thing I give 7 over Vista is preformance. They really screwed up a bunch of things when making 7. Also, XP was a pain. 2k was better.09/30/2014 - 4:13pm
Jessy Hart@E. Zachary Knight Is that show called Pac-Man and the Ghostly Adventures?09/30/2014 - 3:34pm
IanCWin 8 isn't bad, it just can't decide whether to be a desktop OS or a tablet OS.09/30/2014 - 2:40pm
IanCI think its a way of getting round giving it free to Win 8 users...09/30/2014 - 2:39pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician