ECA Action Alert: Massachusetts Net Neutrality Law

March 15, 2011 -

The ECA has issued an "Action Alert" asking its members to help influence a Massachusetts net neutrality law sponsored by Massachusetts Representative Tom Sannicandro. The full alert from the ECA is below:

"The internet has allowed mass communication and collaboration on a scale never before seen in human history. People from vast distances are able to work together on projects and weigh in with thoughts concerning issues that matter to them. We ask you to add your thoughts regarding an issue that should matter to you – net neutrality.

Massachusetts Representative Tom Sannicandro has recognized this tool for what it is and will introduce a bill concerning Net Neutrality that involves people’s input using LexPop. You can get started and add your thoughts about Net Neutrality here.

The idea of public participation in policy isn’t new; it’s an idea that’s been tossed around for some time now. This is the first time it’s being done in the United States and it’s appropriate that it concerns the issue of Net Neutrality which is the very heart of openness online.

We’ve put together a dashboard for you to learn a bit more about Net Neutrality and check out some of the other campaigns we’ve run on the issue. After you’ve studied up, head over to LexPop and add in additional links for research and discussion in the first phase of this collaborative effort. The first phase ends on March 20. Here’s our opportunity to directly influence policy and make sure we get an internet that’s free and open. Get involved today."

Here's what LexPop says about working with on this issue:

"Over the next few weeks, we'll be working with Representative Tom Sannicandro of Massachusetts to create a net neutrality law. And let's make it good -- if we come up with something substantive, Representative Sannicandro has agreed to introduce our bill to the MA House of Representatives. LexPop.org is devoted to expanding participation in democracy. Simply put, we think our policy will be better if more voices are heard."

And here is how the process works:

"The MA Net Neutrality policy drive will proceed through three phases, and each has its own page on LexPop. During any given stage, the other stages will be locked.

Phase One: Hearing. In the first step, participants provide links to research and discuss problems and solutions. This step is crucially important as the research and discussion will form the backbone of the policy we create. Tentative end date: 3.20.2011.

Phase Two: Markup. In this step, participants will draw from the research ideas, comments, and arguments to outline the policy. Use the discussion page to hash out the details and give the policy shape. Tentative end date: 4.3.2011.

Phase Three: Build the Bill. By this step, the major arguments should have been settled and the decisions made. What is left now is for the participants to draft the legislative text to prepare it for submission. Tentative end date: 4.15.2011.

There won't be a distinct phase for it, but it is also important to recognize the best contributors and discuss whether we have the initial time lengths right. Remember, it's all about collaboration."

[Full Disclosure: Game Politics is an ECA publication.]


 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
DocMelonheadA Game Politic Journalist is interviewing KiA as of right now and have no access on the Other side due to his ban at GamerGhazi08/03/2015 - 10:57pm
DocMelonheadhttps://www.reddit.com/r/AgainstGamerGate/comments/3f69sd/hi_im_the_guy_interviewing_gamergate_right_now/08/03/2015 - 10:56pm
DocMelonheadAlso you keep on replying as if you wanted to prove that Total Biscuit have no input because he harass Sarkeesain through defamation. Also take a look at this:08/03/2015 - 10:55pm
IronPatriotDocMelon, are you saying that Andrew Eisen is NOT an ethical journalist?08/03/2015 - 10:53pm
IronPatriotSo if Gamergate was actually about ethics, gamergaters would condemn TotalBiscuit. Right?08/03/2015 - 10:52pm
DocMelonheadI didn't said he was ethical you harassing fool. Why the hell are you attacking Total Biscuit anyways? He's a commentator for christ sake.08/03/2015 - 10:52pm
IronPatriotBecause if TB's informational videos are full of lies, then TB is guilty of bad ethics in game journalism. Right?08/03/2015 - 10:52pm
IronPatriotSo now that you know you cannot defend TotalLYINGbiscuit as merely only "parroting" pro-gamergate lies against gamergate victims like Sarkeesian, please explain how TB is ethical.08/03/2015 - 10:51pm
DocMelonheadWell good for you for pointing that out that Total Biscuit lies about everything.08/03/2015 - 10:50pm
IronPatriotDocmelon admits "DocMelonhead: Iron Patriot, I have no proof, I got no evidence" for his false claim defending TotalLYINGbiscuit. Thank you for finally being honest.08/03/2015 - 10:49pm
DocMelonheadFace it, going through your collection of articles to prove that gamergate is a cover for harassment ain't going to cut it to those who believe said movement can be salvage.08/03/2015 - 10:48pm
DocMelonheadOr all you wanted to see is counter proof that GamerGate is a Bigot campaign against Social Justice Studies in Video games? Either way, It's no wonder you got banned back then.08/03/2015 - 10:43pm
DocMelonheadI said that as a belief because the lie that Anita Sarkeesian is a Hack is very common among the skeptics. Also why the well do you dehumanize Total Biscuit anyways? Do you have a grudge against gamergate?08/03/2015 - 10:42pm
DocMelonheadIron Patriot, I have no proof, I got no evidence, hell the main reason I said that is because I hate your aggressiveness. All I said is that I believe that Total Biscuit regurgitate the same belief that Anita Sarkeesisan's a fraud08/03/2015 - 10:37pm
IronPatriotbenohawk, why do you believe TotalLyingBiscuit when he says he cares about ethics? If he cared about ethics, why did he LIE so much about Gamergate victims like Sarkeesian? How is his lying ETHICAL?08/03/2015 - 10:22pm
IronPatriotDocMelon, prove your claim that TotalLyingBiscuit did not make up the anti-Sarkeesian lies he told to proven harassers in Gamergate. Prove it.08/03/2015 - 10:19pm
DocMelonheadOnce you watch this in full, then you realize why Gamergate is a thing.08/03/2015 - 10:10pm
DocMelonheadSo once again, I invite you to watch this video to see what I mean: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6y8XgGhXkTQ&list=PLJA_jUddXvY62dhVThbeegLPpvQlR4CjF08/03/2015 - 10:09pm
benohawkThe simplest way is to look at what he's said in total, as mentioned before, he's come out against harassment, and that his past behavior suggests that he's very much in it for Ethics and not to try and drive women out of the industry08/03/2015 - 10:03pm
DocMelonheadBecause that is the exact same nutpicking that made GamerGate infamous in the first place.08/03/2015 - 10:02pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician