PS3 Jailbreaker Battles for Motion to Dismiss SCEA Case

March 29, 2011 -

In new court documents filed by PS3 jailbreaker George Hotz's attorney, Stewart Kellar, asked that the court ignore recent SCEA filings that make claims about Hotz "running to South America," owning a PlayStation Network account, and deliberately removing data from hard drives submitted to a third-party for inspection by the court. Kellar also asked the court to deny SCEA jurisdiction in California.

The bulk of Kellar's argument are found in this PDF file, but the main thrust of it is that SCEA does not own or create the hardware and firmware that it alleges Hotz tampered with - that destinction belongs to Sony Japan. They also call into question the power of the PlayStation Network terms of service, claiming that Hotz never used the service at all. In fact, Kellar claims, Hotz never accepted the PSN TOS and that Sony has no evidence to prove otherwise.

There are many other arguments that Kellar makes in the PDF, but if you are too lazy to read it Groklaw has a great summary of everything going on in the case with these latest filings.

Below is Kellar's "closing argument" to the court:

"For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff respectfully requests the Court to sustain these objec-tions and to strike the testimony referred to above. Further, the Court cannot rely on this declaration as it is not made under penalty of per-jury and because it intentionally attempted to hide relevant evidence from the Court by not showing the serial number that SCEA actually found in its database, which does not match the serial number of the Playstation Computer owned by Mr. Hotz."

Source: PSX-Scene

 


Comments

Re: PS3 Jailbreaker Battles for Motion to Dismiss SCEA Case

You don't have to create an account to accept the TOS.

By simply setting up and using the product you're accepting it. 

Its clear as day.  This shouldn't even be a case.

The guy f'd up, and he should get what he deserves. Personally I'd burn him at the stake. 

Re: PS3 Jailbreaker Battles for Motion to Dismiss SCEA Case

Burn him at the stake? You disgust me.

-Greevar

-Greevar

"Paste superficially profound, but utterly meaningless quotation here."

Re: PS3 Jailbreaker Battles for Motion to Dismiss SCEA Case

Yeah, the guys a hacker accused of enabling piracy. Say you want to throw him if the plank if you're okey with murder.

Re: PS3 Jailbreaker Battles for Motion to Dismiss SCEA Case

so by your logic, if i bought diablo 2 but never set up an account with battle.net (and thus never accepted that specific ToS), im still bound by battle.net's ToS?

Re: PS3 Jailbreaker Battles for Motion to Dismiss SCEA Case

In a manner of speaking, yes. But since you're not playing on battle.net, there's no way to break the ToS. Not literally speaking, it's all technical bullcrap. but yeah, the ToS are still there.

"Power means nothing without honor and pride."

http://grifsgamereviews.blogspot.com My video game review site.

Re: PS3 Jailbreaker Battles for Motion to Dismiss SCEA Case

Funny claiming he never accepted the TOS considering you have to accept the TOS to make an account. 

Re: PS3 Jailbreaker Battles for Motion to Dismiss SCEA Case

claiming he never made an account.

Re: PS3 Jailbreaker Battles for Motion to Dismiss SCEA Case

It's a fairly decent argument. This is a civil case and Hotz was under no court order or other obligation to stay in the United States, as long as he maintains communication with his attorney and didn't take anything with him he was specifically ordered to turn over to Sony or the court then yelling about him leaving is completely frivolous.

This case is going to be a nightmare of Electronic Discovery. Judges are notoriously horrible with computer based evidence, they don't understand the tranisitional and necessarily temporary nature of much of the data on a computer.

Should be interesting to see how this proceeds. 

Re: PS3 Jailbreaker Battles for Motion to Dismiss SCEA Case

Sony, how's that ironclad case working for ya?  About as well as that CD protection system a few years ago, I say.

Nightwng2000

NW2K Software

http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000

Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Nightwng2000 NW2K Software http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000 Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Re: PS3 Jailbreaker Battles for Motion to Dismiss SCEA Case

The one they spent millions developing but was foiled by scribbling on the edge with and eighty nine cent marker?

Re: PS3 Jailbreaker Battles for Motion to Dismiss SCEA Case

Actually, yes, this is the one I was talking about.  I LOVE throwing it in their face.  BWHAHAHAHAHA!

Nightwng2000

NW2K Software

http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000

Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Nightwng2000 NW2K Software http://www.facebook.com/nightwing2000 Nightwng2000 is now admin to the group "Parents For Education, Not Legislation" on MySpace as http://groups.myspace.com/pfenl

Re: PS3 Jailbreaker Battles for Motion to Dismiss SCEA Case

Me too 8) They spend millions developing it, and someone breaks it for far less than they paid for it, making it worthless.

Re: PS3 Jailbreaker Battles for Motion to Dismiss SCEA Case

I think he is referring to their root kit fiasco. In which SONY BMG cds installed malware on your computer that disabled many cd rom drives and prevented many 3rd party music players from even playing the cds.

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

Re: PS3 Jailbreaker Battles for Motion to Dismiss SCEA Case

Ah, ok, so basically they ruined your 500 dollar computer to protect their 12 dollar CD

Re: PS3 Jailbreaker Battles for Motion to Dismiss SCEA Case

Yeah, pretty much.

E. Zachary Knight
Oklahoma City Chapter of the ECA
http://www.theeca.com/chapters_oklahoma

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Should 'Hatred' have been removed from Steam Greenlight?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
PHX Corp@Adam802 We'll break out the popcorn in June12/19/2014 - 9:23pm
ZippyDSMleeMaskedPixelante: I'm itching to start it too but I will wait till the patch goes live. >>12/19/2014 - 7:52pm
Adam802Leland Yee and Jackson get trial date: http://sfbay.ca/2014/12/18/leland-yee-keith-jackson-get-trial-date/12/19/2014 - 5:24pm
MaskedPixelanteNevermind. Turns out when they said "the patch is now live", they meant "it's still in beta".12/19/2014 - 5:07pm
MaskedPixelanteSo I bought Dark Souls PC, and it's forcing me to log into GFWL. Did I miss something?12/19/2014 - 5:00pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/12/republicans-may-have-plan-to-save-internet-providers-from-utility-rules/ this is intreasting. congress may put net nutrality in to law to avoid title 2 classification12/19/2014 - 2:45pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://www.polygon.com/2014/12/19/7421953/bullshit-cards-against-humanity-donated-250k-sunlight-foundation I have to admit I like the choice o organization. congrats to CAH.12/19/2014 - 1:51pm
E. Zachary KnightIf you are downloading a copy in order to bypass the DRM, then you are legally in the wrong. Ethically, if you bought the game, it doesn't matter where you download it in the future.12/19/2014 - 12:06pm
InfophileEZK: Certainly better that way, though not foolproof. Makes me think though: does it count as piracy if you download a game you already paid for, just not from the place you paid for it at? Ethically, I'd say no, but legally, probably yes.12/19/2014 - 11:20am
ZippyDSMleeAnd I still spent 200$ in the last month on steam/GOG stuff sales get me nearly every time ><12/19/2014 - 10:55am
ZippyDSMleeMaskedPixelante:And this is why I'm a one legged bandit.12/19/2014 - 10:51am
ZippyDSMleeE. Zachary Knight: I buy what I can as long as I can get cracks for it...then again it I could have gotton Lords of the Fallen for 30 with DLC I would have ><12/19/2014 - 10:50am
MaskedPixelantehttp://www.joystiq.com/2014/12/19/marvel-vs-capcom-origins-leaving-online-storefronts-soon/ Speaking of "last chance to buy", Marvel vs. Capcom Origins is getting delisted from all major storefronts. Behold the wonders of the all digital future.12/19/2014 - 9:59am
MaskedPixelanteSeriously, the so-called "Last Chance" sale was up to 80% off, while this one time only return sale goes for a flat 85% off with a 90% off upgrade if you buy the whole catalogue.12/19/2014 - 9:37am
E. Zachary KnightInfophile, Tha is why I buy only DRM-free games.12/19/2014 - 9:37am
MaskedPixelanteNordic is back on GOG for one weekend only. And at 85% off no less, which is kind of a slap in the face to people who paid more during the "NORDIC IS LEAVING FOREVER BUY NOW OR FOREVER HOLD YOUR PEACE" sale, but whatever...12/19/2014 - 9:28am
InfophileRe PHX's link: This is one of the reasons the digital revolution isn't all it's cracked up to be. There's also the flip side where Sony can block access to games you've bought if they ban your account for unrelated reasons. All power is theirs.12/19/2014 - 8:52am
MaskedPixelantehttp://uplay.ubi.com/#!/en-US/events/uplay-15-days You can win FREE GAMES FOR A YEAR! Unfortunately, they're Ubisoft games.12/18/2014 - 6:29pm
Papa MidnightAh, so it was downtime. I've been seeing post appear in my RSS feed, but I was unable to access GamePolitics today across several ISPs.12/18/2014 - 6:06pm
james_fudgeSorry for the downtime today, folks.12/18/2014 - 5:54pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician