Brad Wardell: Steam Taking Away From Valve's Game Development Efforts

April 13, 2011 -

According to Stardock CEO (the company that used to own Impulse before it sold off its digital distribution platform to GameStop) Brad Wardell, Steam is holding up Valve's ability to develop its various game properties in a timely fashion. Wardell made his comments in a recent interview with IndustryGamers. In Wardell's opinion, the resources needed to continually operate and manage a digital distribution platform as massive as Steam has led to a slowdown in Valve's game development capabilities over the years.

"Even though Valve is in Seattle, where you can get developers everywhere, [Steam's] had an effect on their own development schedule," Wardell told IndustryGamers. "There's not been a new Half-Life in a long time; a lot of people have complained about that."

Some would argue that maybe Wardell is comparing his own experiences with that of Valve's. In the past he has said that managing Impulse was a key reason why its latest game Elemental: War of Magic, was such a mess. The digital distribution platform got so big that the company had to move resources around - and away from game development - to deal with it.

"They've had their own challenges getting new titles out the door, and a big part of that I'm sure is the same problems we've had. When one of your groups is so ridiculously profitable, every business instinct you have is to throw all your best people at it, because that's what's making the money. That's just sound business. At the end of the day, again you have decide if that's what you want to do."

Wardell added if you compare Valve's development time prior to Steam you can see that it has an impact over the years.

Of course the company has certainly expanded since the days before Steam came along and has plenty of developmental talent to work with that have nothing to do with Steam at all..

Source: IndustryGamers


Comments

Re: Brad Wardell: Steam Taking Away From Valve's Game ...

Confirms what I've always suspected.  I think it's the reasl reason we still haven't gotten Half-Life 2: Episode 3.  It's not a huge jump to conclusion that they've put so much effort into running and maintaining Steam, plus being distracted by the sudden success of Portal, that development of Episode 3 got pushed to the backburner.  At this point, I think, it'd be more prudent for Steam to be spun-off into a separate company.

Re: Brad Wardell: Steam Taking Away From Valve's Game ...

Eh, I tend to ignore Wardell....

Typical manager who has never read the mythical man month.. or thinks in terms of having more then one team.  I imagine the people who maintain Steam are not the same people working on games....

Re: Brad Wardell: Steam Taking Away From Valve's Game ...

I'm inclined to agree with this. Stardock started out as a general software company and then started making games later, so it might be understandable that they have people who can work in either way. Valve is just the opposite, they were making games before Steam came out and I don't see any reason to think that Steam is being maintained by the same people who were working on Valve's games before.
---
I'm not under the affluence of incohol as some thinkle peep I am. I'm not half as thunk as you might drink. I fool so feelish I don't know who is me, and the drunker I stand here, the longer I get.


---
I'm not under the affluence of incohol as some thinkle peep I am. I'm not half as thunk as you might drink. I fool so feelish I don't know who is me, and the drunker I stand here, the longer I get.

Re: Brad Wardell: Steam Taking Away From Valve's Game ...

It's still a valid point that Valve had a reputation for releasing on "Valve Time" long before Steam came out.  Half-Life 2 (the title that launched it) took how many years, even before Steam had been thought of?  Team Fortress 2 was vaporware for almost as long as Duke Nukem Forever, 11 years IIRC: it was out within a coupple years of Steam's launch.

I suspect that which is actually delaying HL2: ep3 is all those other studios/teams they took under their wing to make Portal, L4D (twice) and Alien Swarm. ;p

Re: Brad Wardell: Steam Taking Away From Valve's Game ...

mine and a friend's responce

 

Sora: well lets see... how did it slow down valve's development? hmmm....
Sora: didnt they release like... three games in the past two years?
Sora: alien swarm, l4d and l4d2?
Raptor: Hmmm
Raptor: Portal 2 soon
Sora: and more L4D2 content
Raptor: valve has ALWAYS been slow to develop, because they take TIME AND CARE with their products
Sora: yep
Sora: even before steam if i recall
Raptor: TIME.... AND ...CARE.... wonderfulw ords
Raptor: oh yeah, definatly

 

 

I think they are going just fine and steam isn't affecting them as much as Mr Wardell says/beleives.

L4D came out november 2008, so its still slightly over two years from what I had said in that chat.

But not only have they released games, but quite a bit of content for L4D, L4D2, TF2, and even a few easter eggs in Portal, along with practically bi-monthly patches for a majority of their game engine and games. I would definately they're the right speed. Yes we dont have episode 3 or HL3 yet.

Also Mr Wardell needs to look up Valve Time =P

╔╦═╣Signature Statement╠═╦╗

If you don't like something I said in a post, don't just hit the dislike, let me know your thoughts! I'm interested in knowing everyone's opinions, even when they don't mesh with my own.

Re: Brad Wardell: Steam Taking Away From Valve's Game ...

Hmmm, let's see..

L4D1/2: Made by Turtle Rock Studios, bought by Valve during dev of L4D1.

Portal: Made by the Narbacular Drop team after being hired by Valve

Alien Swarm: Made by Black Cat Games, hired by Valve during dev of Alien Swarm (not to be confused with the team's original creation, Alien Swarm for UT2k4, of which Alien Swarm for Source is a remake/Sequel)

 

You and your friend's argument seems a little.. Unenlightened.

Re: Brad Wardell: Steam Taking Away From Valve's Game ...

Pretty valid argument.  One issue is Portal.  Yes, it was assisted by that team, but take note how Portal is slowly intertwining with the Half-Life universe.  I'm sure Portal 2 will also have a deeper impact on HL2 and lead into Ep3.

One thing I should point out is that the voice actor of Dr. Breen passed away not too long ago, which I'm sure puts a major setback to the game's progression (IE finding someone to replace because I feel his character will have a major role in the end), let alone that I recall this episodic content being a trilogy and there is a ton of ends to cover in this one (Lets look at MGS4 and how it took forever to end as many possible loose ends as in the million hours of cutscenes).

Re: Brad Wardell: Steam Taking Away From Valve's Game ...

Better to delay the next Half Life than sell off Steam to some retailer who's business practices screw over developers.

Just sayin'...

Re: Brad Wardell: Steam Taking Away From Valve's Game ...

You mean like EA or Activision? Yeah, those guys are retarded. I don't see how they keep making so much money.

"Power means nothing without honor and pride."

http://grifsgamereviews.blogspot.com My video game review site.

Re: Brad Wardell: Steam Taking Away From Valve's Game ...

Nothing wrong with that.  Maybe some Valve games have been delayed or back-burnered due to the focus on Steam, but I think on the whole it's had a tremendously positive impact on PC gaming -- and potentially a night-and-day one on Mac gaming.

Re: Brad Wardell: Steam Taking Away From Valve's Game ...

What Mr. Wardell says may be true.  Steam presumably creates much more revenue for Valve than fast-tracking game development.  Also, considering that the next Half Life (whatever form it takes) will sell very well regardless if it comes out tomorrow or two years from now, Valve has no reason to rush.

 

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Did Microsoft pay too much ($2.5 billion) for Minecraft developer Mojang?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
ConsterSleaker: if you think there's only been "a handful of" incidents, you have your head stuck *somewhere* - I'm assuming it's sand.09/20/2014 - 5:38am
prh99Most of it's agitprop clickbait anyway.09/20/2014 - 5:27am
prh99A good reason to stop reading reguardless of view pointhttp://www.theguardian.com/media/2013/apr/12/news-is-bad-rolf-dobelli.09/20/2014 - 5:22am
Andrew EisenWell this is unique! A musical critique of the Factual Feminist's "Are Video Games Sexist?" video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-K4s7cV4Us409/20/2014 - 2:41am
Andrew EisenSome locked threads. Some let them be. So, no, I'm not seeing a problem here. No corruption. No collusion. No ethical problem with privately discussing ethics.09/20/2014 - 12:48am
Andrew EisenAnd still, in the end, Tito made up his own mind on how to handle his site. All 150 or so members went off to handle their own sites in their own ways. Some talked about it. Some didn't. Some changed disclosure policies. Some didn't.09/20/2014 - 12:40am
Andrew EisenThere were two comments other than Kochera and Tito's. One pointed out the Escapist Code of Conduct, another comment was in support of Tito.09/20/2014 - 12:40am
Andrew EisenKochera privately expressed his disagreement on how Tito decided to do something. No, I don't consider that crossing a line nor do I consider the exchange an example of the group pressuring him.09/20/2014 - 12:36am
Kronotechnical reasons. Anyways, I need to get to sleep as well.09/20/2014 - 12:29am
KronoAnd he wasn't the only one pushing Tito to censor the thread. If Tito had bowed to peer pressure, we likely wouldn't have gotten this http://goo.gl/vKiYtR which grew out of that thread. Said thread also lasted until a new one needed to be made for09/20/2014 - 12:28am
Krono@Andrew So it's an example of Kuchera crossing the line from reporter to advocate. And an example of the group pressuring for censorship.09/20/2014 - 12:21am
E. Zachary KnightAnyway, I am off to bed. I will probably wake up to all of this being knocked off the shout box.09/20/2014 - 12:20am
E. Zachary KnightKrono, that is the type of reading too much into things that bugs me. Ben did no such thing. Greg had the last word in that part of the exchange. The rest was about how to approach the story and Quinn.09/20/2014 - 12:19am
Andrew EisenSo?09/20/2014 - 12:13am
KronoExcept that the forum thread wasn't harassment, and Kuchera continued to push for the thread's removal after Tito made it clear he didn't consider it harassment.09/20/2014 - 12:12am
Andrew EisenPersonally, I see nothing wrong with someone offering their opinion or the other person making up their own mind on how to run their site.09/20/2014 - 12:06am
E. Zachary KnightKrono, I read nothing of the sort in that email chain. I read Ben giving advice on what to do when a forum thread is used to harass someone and spread falshoods about them and others.09/20/2014 - 12:05am
KronoThat's exactly what Ben Kuchera was doing to Greg Tito.09/19/2014 - 11:58pm
Krono@EZK So you see nothing wrong with one journalist pressuring a journalist from a different organization to not only not run a story, but to censor a civil discussion already taking place?09/19/2014 - 11:56pm
E. Zachary KnightI write for a number of blogs and talk to people who write similar blogs all the time for tips and advice. I see nothing wrong with that.09/19/2014 - 11:50pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician