Sony Targets 'OtherOS' Hacker with Second Raid

April 13, 2011 -

A mere 48 hours after George Hotz and Sony Computer Entertainment America settled their legal dispute, Sony has put its focus back on PS3 hacker graf_chokolo. According to a report on PS3 hacking site PSX-Scene, Sony has visited the home of graf_chokolo for a second time. According to that report, which is based on a post from the man himself, Sony seized a bunch of computer equipment this time around. Here is what he said on his official web site:

"SONY was at my home today again, with a new TRO against me. They took my whole equipment again and told me to stop my OtherOS project or else …. , guys. They definitely do not want OtherOS back on PS3. They want me to take down all my OtherOS and PS3 utils. Make sure to clone all my GIT repositories. I don’t think you want me to stop, guys, do you ? Tell me what you think."

Sony has neither confirmed or denied the report as true, but it would seem pretty silly for a guy that is mucking around with the removed "OtherOS" functions of the PS3 to lie about it. We will have more on this story as it develops.

Source: PSX-Scene


Comments

Re: Sony Targets 'OtherOS' Hacker with Second Raid

Funny how in this whole mess, nothing's been heard from them. To be honest, I'd be shocked if it wasn't a super tiny number of people. I installed Linux on my launch 60GB PS3 for kicks when the OtherOS function was around. It's useless. A 10 year old Pentium II runs Linux better than the PS3. It's slow, low res and doesn't even have the capability to play the lowest quality Flash video worth a damn. It's a neat experiment but as a whole, useless for most people.

I personally think it was dumb for Sony to put the OtherOS feature in there to begin with. They're removing it to try to stop piracy and online cheating (which I don't care what twits like GeoHot claim, it is far and away the majority use of it) and yet they never really seemed to have a reason for putting it in there to begin with. Someone clearly wasn't thinking ahead when they added it as it was obvious to most tha tit could be used for nefarious purposes.

I think Sony should have left it in because they added it and if it's being used for bad purposes, that's really their problem and they should have to live with their mistake. That said, GeoHot's an arrogant prat who made priacy and cheating trivial but thinks he gets completely off the hook by going "Well even though I made this possible, I don't support it therefore I have no culpability!" He's as much to blame for OtherOS being gone as Sony is. As far as I'm concerned, they can both piss off.

Parallax Abstraction
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Parallax Abstraction
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Re: Sony Targets 'OtherOS' Hacker with Second Raid

In general, just running Linux as a user on a PS3 is pretty useless.

Runing as a programmer though opens up some interesting possibilities.  I has the PS2 Linux bundle and had a ball playing around with the PS2's graphics in ways I never could have otherwise.

Re: Sony Targets 'OtherOS' Hacker with Second Raid

They can put Linux on another computer for free, so I don't see a complaint.

---

With the first link, the chain is forged.

--- With the first link, the chain is forged.

Re: Sony Targets 'OtherOS' Hacker with Second Raid

If I buy something for purposes X and Y, and the manufacturer later takes away my ability to use it for purpose X without any kind of refund... you better believe I am going to complain. If Sony were a smaller company it would be called fraud.

Re: Sony Targets 'OtherOS' Hacker with Second Raid

True enough, but if purpose X was never advertised, and it's not even on the box, and the only way you heard of it was word of mouth, would you still complain? That's part of the argument, is that the Other OS feature was never actively advertised.

"Power means nothing without honor and pride."

http://grifsgamereviews.blogspot.com My video game review site.

Re: Sony Targets 'OtherOS' Hacker with Second Raid

"Sony removed a feature of my PS3."

There's the complaint.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Sony Targets 'OtherOS' Hacker with Second Raid

"Sony removed a feature of my PS3."

Sony: "It isn't your PS3. It's still ours."

And another complaint. To me this is the issue. The removal of 'OtherOS' is only the top of the iceberg. You shell out $$$ for a videogame system, and they can do whatever they want to it after you buy it? It's like buying it at a yard sell, and the original owner is trying to tell you what you can and can't do with it.

 - W 

Consumer responsibility is just as important as Corporate responsibility. So, be responsible consumers.

Re: Sony Targets 'OtherOS' Hacker with Second Raid

Sony obviously cares nothing about collateral in their own private little war.

Re: Sony Targets 'OtherOS' Hacker with Second Raid

They might if that class action lawsuit succeeds.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Sony Targets 'OtherOS' Hacker with Second Raid

It won't.

"Power means nothing without honor and pride."

http://grifsgamereviews.blogspot.com My video game review site.

Re: Sony Targets 'OtherOS' Hacker with Second Raid

Wow, sounds like they are going after him with both bazookas blazing. It's starting to feel like Sony will be going against the entire hacking community before everything is said and done with. Sony might do good against them individually, but if it is the entire community, would they be able to keep up?

 - W 

Consumer responsibility is just as important as Corporate responsibility. So, be responsible consumers.

Re: Sony Targets 'OtherOS' Hacker with Second Raid

*Looks down the list of conversations, 3 days later*

...Dammit, Cecil! What have you DONE?!

"Power means nothing without honor and pride."

http://grifsgamereviews.blogspot.com My video game review site.

Re: Sony Targets 'OtherOS' Hacker with Second Raid

Without getting in to the whole right, wrong, legal, illegal, etc mess, that kinda is the question.

Is this trying to filling a well with pebbles? a pointless fight? regardless of intentions, there will always be people who do this.

I guess if there's a warning for the hacking community its "keep it to yourself", after all i doubt sony would give a shit if someone just hacked their PS3, kept it offline, and did whatever the hell they do with a hacked PS3 without plasting it over the internet where you could be traced/found. Personally if i hacked my PS3 that's what I'd  do. 

Re: Sony Targets 'OtherOS' Hacker with Second Raid

Same here.

...If I owned a PS3, and had the knowlage that is.

 - W

Consumer responsibility is just as important as Corporate responsibility. So, be responsible consumers.

Re: Sony Targets 'OtherOS' Hacker with Second Raid

Therein lies the problem. Hackers tend to be an arrogant bunch. Not saying they all are, just most of them. Once they hack something, they have this involuntary tick where they absolutely HAVE to blab about it to all their buddies, as well as anyone else who will listen. That's how Hotz got into trouble in the first place. Some people don't think 15 minutes of fame is enough. 

"Power means nothing without honor and pride."

http://grifsgamereviews.blogspot.com My video game review site.

Re: Sony Targets 'OtherOS' Hacker with Second Raid

Grif, fortunately most objective people here will see your comment as a blantant generalization and simply discredit your for being uneducated on the topic.

Re: Sony Targets 'OtherOS' Hacker with Second Raid

That's fine. Prove me wrong, then.

"Power means nothing without honor and pride."

http://grifsgamereviews.blogspot.com My video game review site.

Re: Sony Targets 'OtherOS' Hacker with Second Raid

Nice try.  Prove yourself RIGHT.

Re: Sony Targets 'OtherOS' Hacker with Second Raid

I don't have to. If you want me to accept your view, then offer proof countering my statement. Otherwise, I accept my observation as fact.

You're new to this debating thing, aren't you?

"Power means nothing without honor and pride."

http://grifsgamereviews.blogspot.com My video game review site.

Re: Sony Targets 'OtherOS' Hacker with Second Raid

Not at all; I know a classic troll technique when I see one.

I'm not going to do your homework for you, providing research and citations while you sit back and go "Nuh-uh".  You're insulting my intelligence as well as your own.

The purpose of a debate isn't to make the other guy concede -- how many debates have you honestly seen end that way? --, it's to convince spectators.

Your argument consists of telling other people to prove negatives, insisting that addition is the same as subtraction, and now asking me to do your research for you.  I think it's pretty self-evident that you have absolutely nothing to back your case up, and aren't very good at bluffing either.

Re: Sony Targets 'OtherOS' Hacker with Second Raid

I've given my arguments. Your techniques seem to be dodging my questions and trying to find evidence where there is none. You want my evidence? Fine.

Hotz is a hacker. Hotz is an arrogant ass. Hotz couldn't keep his work to himself. Hotz was circumenting the copy protection on the PS3 to bring back a feature Sony Removed. Hotz thought what he was completely innocent of wrongdoing. Hotz folded like a cheap suit when Sony sued him for violating the DMCA.

And again, I didn't say ALL hackers are arrogant, just most of them. I've seen it done time and time again. Hacker does something he thinks is cool, he has to show everyone. If you want more evidence, you're saying this whole case isn't enough for you?

"Power means nothing without honor and pride."

http://grifsgamereviews.blogspot.com My video game review site.

Re: Sony Targets 'OtherOS' Hacker with Second Raid

Now to impart perspective on you.  This is what you sound like

"

Hotz is black. Hotz is a violent criminal. Hotz couldn't keep from robbing the 711. Hotz has broken his court ordered probtion. Hotz thought what he was completely innocent of wrongdoing. Hotz folded like a cheap suit when his hommies ratted on him.

And again, I didn't say ALL blacks are violent criminals, just most of them. I've seen it done time and time again. Blacks can't control their animal urges, they have no self control. If you want more evidence, you're saying this whole case isn't enough for you?"

-Ultimately what will do in mankind is a person's fear of their own freedom-

Re: Sony Targets 'OtherOS' Hacker with Second Raid

"I've given my arguments."

No, you haven't.  In the words of Monty Python, "Argument is an intellectual process. Contradiction is just the automatic gainsaying of anything the other person says."

"Your techniques seem to be dodging my questions and trying to find evidence where there is none."

Wow, project much?

I've cited articles on the Cell used for grid computing, as well as previous cases involving the DMCA's anti-circumvention clause, and the history of hacking and the entire purpose of the GNU Project.  You've cited your own ass.  You've provided acknowledged conjecture, you've demanded that I prove negatives, and you've demonstrated that you don't even know what "qualifier" means.

That nonsense may impress your classmates in sophomore English, but you're not fooling anyone here.

"Hotz is a hacker."

Yes, he is.

"Hotz is an arrogant ass."

That's not evidence, that's just you restating your opinion.

"Hotz couldn't keep his work to himself."

That doesn't mean he's arrogant.  The entire purpose of hacker culture and the free software/open-source movements is to share your work.  Free software advocates believe that sharing is a moral imperative, while open-source supporters say that it produces higher-quality software.  You may believe that sharing is arrogant, but that's not what Mr. Rogers taught me.

"Hotz was circumenting the copy protection on the PS3 to bring back a feature Sony Removed."

This is true.

It's also not something anybody, anywhere has disputed.  It brings nothing whatsoever to the conversation, it simply restates the nature of the case.

"Hotz thought what he was completely innocent of wrongdoing. Hotz folded like a cheap suit when Sony sued him for violating the DMCA."

Which doesn't mean he was guilty, or that he was arrogant, just that he didn't have the resources to stand up to Sony in court.

"And again, I didn't say ALL hackers are arrogant, just most of them. I've seen it done time and time again. Hacker does something he thinks is cool, he has to show everyone. If you want more evidence, you're saying this whole case isn't enough for you?"

That is exactly what I'm saying.  A single example does not prove a majority of cases.  And you haven't even proven that single example -- hell, you haven't provided the barest shred of evidence.  "He told people how to perform a hack, therefore he's arrogant"?  That's tenuous and laughable, even by your sad standards.

You should probably just stop talking, like you have in all the other threads.  Every time you open your mouth you make it clearer and clearer that your opinions are made up from whole cloth and you can't cite a single fact to back them up.

I'll tell you what I told Jedi: go read up on the history of hacker culture and the GNU Project, and maybe you'll learn something.  I'm not going to dig up the links again; I've wasted more than enough time on you.  Find my response to him if you're interested in alleviating your ignorance instead of just flaunting it.

Re: Sony Targets 'OtherOS' Hacker with Second Raid

There is a difference between sharing and bragging. I'm all for sharing free information, that's cool. I love free information. However, what Hotz does is show off, not share freely. Do you honestly think Hotz is one of your "white hat" hackers who have nothing but good intentions? I don't think so. I don't think Hotz would even bother unless there was something in it for him, like fame, or money. 

I don't have anything against hackers in general. Just arrogant asses like Hotz who think they're all big because they know their way around zeores and ones.

***

AE: That was uncalled for.  Don't do that.

"Power means nothing without honor and pride."

http://grifsgamereviews.blogspot.com My video game review site.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenAnd again, you keep saying "accountable." What exactly does that mean? How is Gamasutra not accounting for the editorial it published?07/28/2015 - 11:47pm
Andrew EisenMatt - I disagree with your 9:12 and 9:16 comment. There are myriad ways to address content you don't like. And they're far easier to execute in the online space.07/28/2015 - 11:47pm
Andrew EisenMatt - Banning in the legal sense? Not that I'm aware but there have certainly been groups of gamers who have worked towards getting content they don't like removed.07/28/2015 - 11:45pm
DanJAlexander's editorial was and continues to be grossly misrepresented by her opponents. And if you don't like a site, you stop reading it - same as not watching a tv show. They get your first click, but not your second.07/28/2015 - 11:40pm
TechnogeekYes, because actively trying to convince advertisers to influence the editorial content of media is a perfectly acceptable thing to do, especially for a movement that's ostensibly about journalistic ethics.07/28/2015 - 11:02pm
Mattsworknameanother07/28/2015 - 9:16pm
Mattsworknameyou HAVE TO click on it. So they get the click revenue weather you like what it says or not. as such, the targeting of advertisers most likely seemed like a good course of action to those who wanted to hold those media groups accountable for one reason07/28/2015 - 9:16pm
MattsworknameBut, when you look at online media, it's completely different, with far more options, but far few ways to address issues that the consumers may have. In tv, you don't like what they show, you don't watch. But in order to see if you like something online07/28/2015 - 9:12pm
MattsworknameIn tv, and radio, ratings are how it works. your ratings determine how well you do and how much money you an charge.07/28/2015 - 9:02pm
Mattsworknameexpect to do so without someone wanting to hold you to task for it07/28/2015 - 9:00pm
MattsworknameMecha: I don't think anyone was asking for Editoral changes, what they wanted was to show those media groups that if they were gonna bash there own audiance, the audiance was not gonna take it sitting down. you can write what you want, but you can't07/28/2015 - 8:56pm
MattsworknameAndrew, Im asking as a practical question, Have gamers, as a group, ever asked for a game, or other item, to be banned. Im trying to see if theres any cases anyone else remembers cause I cant find or remember any.07/28/2015 - 8:55pm
Andrew EisenAs mentioned, Gamasutra isn't a gaming site, it's a game industry site. I don't feel it's changed its focus at all. Also, I don't get the sense that the majority of the people who took issue with that one opinion piece were regular readers anyway.07/28/2015 - 8:43pm
MattsworknameDitto kotaku, Gawker, VOX, Polygon, ETC07/28/2015 - 8:41pm
MechaTama31So, between pulling a game from one chain of stores, and forcing editorial changes to a media source, only one of them strikes you as being on the edge of censorship, and it's the game one?07/28/2015 - 8:41pm
Andrew EisenHave gamers ever tried to ban a product? Can you be more specific? I'm not clear what you're getting at.07/28/2015 - 8:41pm
Mattsworknamethey should have expected some kind of blow back. But I didn't participate in that specific action07/28/2015 - 8:41pm
MattsworknameAndrew Youd have to ask others about that, I actualyl didn't have much beef with them till last year, so I can't speak to there history. I simply feel that gamesutra chose politics over gaming and chose to make enimies of it's prime audiance. For that,07/28/2015 - 8:40pm
Andrew EisenI'm still not clear on how Gamasutra was lacking in accountability or what it was lacking in accountability for.07/28/2015 - 8:38pm
MattsworknameAndrew: You and I agree on most of that. I don't diagree that there should ahve been other actions taken. Now, I do want to point something out, casue Im not sure if it's happened. Have gamers ever tried to have a product banned?07/28/2015 - 8:37pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician