Gamers' Voice Files Complaint With Channel 5 Over Anti-Game Segment

April 18, 2011 -

UK game player advocacy group Gamers' Voice has filed a formal complaint with Channel 5 over an episode of The Wright Stuff in which violent video games were the topic of discussion. During the show playing violent video games were linked to the shooting of Agnes Sina-Inakoju by Leon Dunkley and Mohammed Smoured. The two have already been convicted for the crime. The pair are members of the London Fields gang, who were responsible for a number of violent acts including the stabbing of 14 year old Shaquille Smith in 2009.

During the show, the host and panel members discussed whether violent games were a significant factor in the boys' behavior. Anne Diamond, who is known for anti-video game rhetoric, was one of those panelists. The show also aired footage of 18-rated Modern Warfare 2's infamous "No Russian" level.

Gamers' Voice says that the context and discussion were poorly balanced and argued, and that airing "unsuitable material before the watershed" constitutes a violation of broadcast rules. The Modern Warfare 2 footage was shown at 10:30 am - a time slot when children are likely to be watching television.

Comments from the group are below:

"It's nothing new that TV loves to sensationalise gamers and shooters," reads a statement on the group's website.

"Instead of trying to learn and educate themselves as to why people commit horrific crimes, TV loves to target gaming. Gaming is easy to attack and it seems that it can conveniently 'explain the increase violent behaviour'.

"In the episode of the 'Wright Stuff' that was aired on Channel 5 on Thursday 14th April, they discussed the alleged causal link between video games and violent behaviour. In particular, they focused on the detached way that 22-year-old Leon Dunkley drew a sub-machine gun and killed customers in a London pizza parlour.

"Instead of talking about possible the social, mental or economic problems that could have driven Dunkley to kill, the Wright stuff went straight to what must be the cause for the problem. It wasn't gang culture which puts perceived respect above regard for human life, no, it's first person shooters that are responsible.

"What was even more shocking was that during the introduction to the discussion, they showed scenes from Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2. Specifically the infamous level 'No Russian' where the play can gun down unarmed civilians, if they so choose. So apparently at 10.30 in the morning during the school holidays, it's fine to show scenes from an 18 rated game to set context of how it causes violence, which goes in some way the level ignorance of all involved in the programme on the subject being discussed."

Minor correction: BBC is not part of Channel 5.

Source: GI.biz


Comments

Re: Gamers' Voice Files Complaint With Channel 5 Over ...

In other news, kids who play Barbie's Horse Adventures are 5 times more likely to be involved in Equestrian-related homicides than those who believe everything they say on FOX News.

"Power means nothing without honor and pride."

http://grifsgamereviews.blogspot.com My video game review site.

Re: Gamers' Voice Files Complaint With Channel 5 Over ...

I watched the segment, it was the usual tabloid TV drivel, what's worse was one of the other panellists was a Doctor and he was going on about the psychological effects when the studies that have been done show the opposite. Anne Diamond even went on to say that the studies that find there's no effect are usually done by videogames companies when again it's the ones that say they do that are usually done by censor happy fools like her. Urgh!

Re: Gamers' Voice Files Complaint With Channel 5 Over ...

From CVG, quoting the show:

"MW: Absolutely. Which you can equate with a teenage boy who almost certainly would have played just those games, spraying a machine gun without..."

Hypothetically, if they were talking about banning games (which I realise they aren't), what sort of sense would that make in the context of someone being able to get their hands on a sub machinegun in the UK? You can't even buy a realistic-looking BB gun without being a member of a club, and even that level of restriction hasn't ruled out the possibility of violent crime.

Re: Gamers' Voice Files Complaint With Channel 5 Over ...

Heres a thought.... have someone play the game during the TV interview. If by the end of the segment nobody has a black eye or a bottle broken over their head can we get past these silly accusations?

Re: Gamers' Voice Files Complaint With Channel 5 Over ...

Because they would probably be careful to find someone who is prone to rage then make them play Devil May Cry or something.

Re: Gamers' Voice Files Complaint With Channel 5 Over ...

Channel 5 have nothing to do with the BBC.

Re: Gamers' Voice Files Complaint With Channel 5 Over ...

^this. For everyone else's reference, it's owned by Richard 'Dirty' Desmond, owner of the Express and Star newspapers, a handful of porn mags (hence the nickname) and the former owner of failed videogames channel xLeague.TV

/b

Re: Gamers' Voice Files Complaint With Channel 5 Over ...

Definitely like the way they seem to be going with the "before the watershed" argument.

"So you say that games cause violence but you have no problem showing the footage that is supposedly causing kids to on killing sprees at a time of day kids might be watching? So which is it?"
 

Re: Gamers' Voice Files Complaint With Channel 5 Over ...

I'm not sure myself- on the one hand it does pick up on their hypocracy, and there is an air of the "That mafia bloke they got on tax charges" genius to it, but on the other hand, it does feel a bit like GV are going "Well, we can't actually do anything about this, but we don't like you so we'll be petty and pick you up on something tangentially relevant".

Still, if it makes the programme makers think twice before doing this sort of thing again, then I'm fine with it- all's fair in love and war, and that.

/b

Re: Gamers' Voice Files Complaint With Channel 5 Over ...

Actually, they seem to have a pretty solid argument. Not to mention, they're one of the few who actually get off their arses and fight back, rather than sit in the forums and bitch about anti-gamer hypocracy (hint hint). Got to give'em credit (and maybe we should give a little more effort).

Re: Gamers' Voice Files Complaint With Channel 5 Over ...

>(hint hint)

Cheeky. ;P

I'm wondering what to do, myself, CVG started a campaign called W.R.O.N.G.:  http://bit.ly/fOs2zC , but it seems most comments are being ignored, as Anne said on the show:

They're having a go at both of us, aren't they? Because of what we said about computer games.

I've come across these people before. If you write anything critical or say anything critical of computer games, you become a victim of really vicious hate mail.


Now I'm not suggesting that some of that 'hate mail' might not be 'really vicious', but I have a feeling much of it is just people disagreeing with her- but really it's only two halves of the same whole, GV is just doing what everyone else is, only more politely. If anything's going to change, then a Strongly Worded Letter isn't going to cut it, IMO.

/b

Re: Gamers' Voice Files Complaint With Channel 5 Over ...

She really said that, huh? Let's see what we can do.

"I've come across these people before. If you write anything critical or say anything critical of what they ignorantly say on a TV show, you become a victim of really passive-aggressive slanderous comments."

Hey, what do you know? It works!

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MaskedPixelanteProbably dihydrogen monoxide, the most dangerous substance in the universe.09/21/2014 - 10:14am
james_fudgewell I hope he called the police so they can let us all know.09/21/2014 - 9:07am
quiknkoldIt's pretty gnarly. Depending on what it is, it could be worse than white powder or a fake bomb.09/21/2014 - 9:06am
james_fudgeI just looked it up on UPS.com09/21/2014 - 8:56am
james_fudgeand expensive for an American to ship to London.09/21/2014 - 8:55am
E. Zachary KnightThat is pretty scary. Would have been worse if it were a fake bomb or white powder.09/21/2014 - 8:49am
quiknkoldThere's some more tweets regarding it with more pictures09/21/2014 - 8:09am
quiknkoldMilo Yiannopoulos was mailed a syringe filled with clear liquid. He claims it's anti gamergate harassment. Mentioned on his twitter twitter.com/Nero/status/51366668391625523209/21/2014 - 8:07am
Andrew EisenNow, having said that, what sites are you reading that are claiming that if "you self-identify as a Gamer, you're immediately the problem" or that gamers are "obligated to stop harassment"? Or was that hyperbole too?09/21/2014 - 1:03am
Andrew EisenFirst of all, ONE person in the Shout box suggested an obligation to call harassers out on their harassing but only after YOU brought it up. Plus, Techno said "when you see it happening." If you don't see it, you're not under any obligation.09/21/2014 - 1:02am
Sleaker@Craig R. - at this point I don't even know what the hashtags are suppsed to be in support of. what does GamerGate actually signify.09/21/2014 - 12:21am
Sleaker@AE - Hyperbole for the first 2, but it seems like some of the comments in the shout are attempting to place blame on fellow gamers because they aren't actively telling people to stop harassing even though they don't necessarily know anyone that has.09/21/2014 - 12:16am
Andrew EisenSleaker - Who the heck are you reading that is claiming "all gamers are bad," we "need to pass laws or judgement on all gamers," that if "you self-identify as a Gamer, you're immediately the problem," or that gamers are "obligated to stop harassment"?09/20/2014 - 9:44pm
erthwjimhe swatted more than just krebs, I think he swatted 30 people http://krebsonsecurity.com/2014/05/teen-arrested-for-30-swattings-bomb-threats/09/20/2014 - 9:31pm
Craig R.Btw, the guy who swatted security expert Brian Krebs? He got picked up recently. It can be done.09/20/2014 - 8:55pm
Craig R.Such things are not done in a vacuum... hence why the 4chan and other logs show what fools you've all been, tricked into doing the trolls' work09/20/2014 - 8:49pm
Sleaker@Technogeek - How do you call someone out that anonymously calls in a SWAT team, or sends threats to people?09/20/2014 - 7:04pm
Technogeek"It also doesn't mean you're obligated to stop harassment from all gamers that are doing so." I'd say you're certainly obligated to call them out when you see it happening.09/20/2014 - 5:17pm
SleakerNow if you disagree with anything in my last 2 posts then we obviously have a difference in world view, and wont come to any sort of agreement. I'm fine with that, maybe some people aren't?09/20/2014 - 5:09pm
SleakerIt also doesn't mean that just because a news outlet says that Gamers are the problem and you self-identify as a Gamer, you're immediately the problem. It also doesn't mean you're obligated to stop harassment from all gamers that are doing so.09/20/2014 - 4:59pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician