WOW Subscriptions Down 5 Percent

May 10, 2011 -

During its post-earnings call this week, Activision blizzard revealed that World of Warcraft subscriptions are down by about five percent. In October 2010, the popular MMORPG had around 12 million subscribers. Now the game enjoys about 11.4 million subscribers. To deal with the drop off, Blizzard's president Michael Morhaime said that the company has to release future expansion packs in a more timely fashion to contain player drop-off.

"As our players have become more experienced playing World of Warcraft over many years, they have become much better and much faster at consuming content," said Blizzard president Michael Morhaime during a conference call. "And so I think with Cataclysm they were able to consume the content faster than with previous expansions, but that's why we're working on developing more content."

"We need to be faster at delivering content to players," he added. "And so that's one of the reasons that we're looking to decrease the amount of time in-between expansions."

"What we have seen so far is that people have been consuming this content very quickly, and so the subscriber levels have decreased faster than in previous expansions," he concluded.

Source: Blue's News, Gamasutra


Comments

Re: WOW Subscriptions Down 5 Percent

The game needed a face lift problem was the end game content really sucked and it was just too hard.

Ghostwalker wanted to go away from Wraith of the Lich King and that it was too easy though most people liked it now people are leaving or finding another game to play well this is a cause and effect moment. Basically you have an elitist staff member who wants to impose his views on a game. Thats like making a Forum Nazi in control of a game development.

Go back to the way Wraith was done and people will come back, right now I see no point in playing WoW as is.

Re: WOW Subscriptions Down 5 Percent

I suspect we'll see some more drops in subscriptions when Guild Wars 2 and Star Wars: The Old Republic release.  They both look excellent, and they appeal to a crowd that isn't obsessed with raiding grinds.  There are a lot of more casual players in WoW that only stay there because there are no really viable A-list titles to migrate to.

Re: WOW Subscriptions Down 5 Percent

I don't doubt it, although I doubt either will oust WoW from the #1 spot just yet. There's definitely room in the market for major competition though.

Re: WOW Subscriptions Down 5 Percent

Is new content no longer included in the subscription fee? It sounds like they add new content only through expansions :(

Re: WOW Subscriptions Down 5 Percent

Content is still released regularly in between expansions. I think Morhaime was trying to say that 2 years between expansions was too slow for the market, which they've been saying since the first expansion.

I don't think they've ever been anywhere near 20 million active. 12 is closer to the mark. They've been fairly stable over the last few years, with fluctuation to the tune of +/- 5% being pretty normal. We're just hearing more detail now as Activision stockholders are learning how significantly tied to WoW's success their investment is.

 A note: they're speaking only of active subscribers. Thats accounts that are currently paid for (by the month in North America or hourly services in Asia that have been active within the last 30 days). These numbers do not include dormant accounts, unused game cards, or free trials.

Re: WOW Subscriptions Down 5 Percent

With optional microtransactions, free-to-play, buy-once-to-play and various combinations of these business models now gaining rapid popularity amongst the online gaming market, I can only imagine the pressure is really on Blizzard to make sure that monthly fee is value for money for its customers.

Re: WOW Subscriptions Down 5 Percent

Given the number of big-name titles coming out since the past couple months and within the next few (Duke Nukem Forever included), I'm not surprised to hear this. Probably many gamers whom are suspending their subscription to play something else for a while.

Re: WOW Subscriptions Down 5 Percent

Call me crazy, but a dropoff from 20 million to 11.4 million strikes me as a tad more than 5%.  Through some totally complicated mathematical wizardry (11.4 divided by 20, subtract result from 1), I'm pegging it at 43%.  So which number is the wrong one?  Was it a 43% drop from 20 to 11.4?  Was it a 5% drop from 12 to 11.4 (this would be my guess)?  Or 5% from 20 to 19?  Enquiring minds want to know.

Re: WOW Subscriptions Down 5 Percent

Looks like the 20 was just a typo and the real number is 12.

E. Zachary Knight
Divine Knight Gaming

Re: WOW Subscriptions Down 5 Percent

This is the first place I've ever heard of WOW having anywhere near 20 million subscribers. I remember about a year or 18 months ago hearing they had somewhere around 11 so I seriously doubt they doubled their subscriptions since then. I would guess that should be 12 down to 11.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Matthew WilsonSF is a tech/ economic/ trade center it should be mostly tail building. this whole problem is because of the lack of tail buildings. How would having tail apartment buildings destroy SF? having tail buildings has not runed other cities around the US/world04/16/2014 - 10:51pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the issue is you can not build upwards anywhere in SF at the moment, and no you would not. You would bring prices to where they should have been before the market distortion. those prices are not economic or socially healthy.04/16/2014 - 10:46pm
ZippyDSMleeYou still wind up pushing people out of the non high rise aeras but tis least damage you can do all things considered.04/16/2014 - 10:26pm
ZippyDSMleeANd by mindlessly building upward you make it like every place else hurting property prices,ect,ect. You'll have to slowly segment the region into aeras where you will never build upward then alow some aeras to build upward.04/16/2014 - 10:25pm
Matthew WilsonSF have to build upwards they have natural growth limits. they can not grow outwards. ps growing outwards is terable just look at Orlando or Austin for that.04/16/2014 - 4:15pm
ZippyDSMleeIf they built upward then it would becoem like every other place making it worthless, if they don't build upward they will price people out making it worthless, what they need to do is a mix of things not just one exstreme or another.04/16/2014 - 4:00pm
Matthew Wilsonyou know the problem in SF was not the free market going wrong right? it was government distortion. by not allowing tall buildings to be build they limited supply. that is not free market.04/16/2014 - 3:48pm
ZippyDSMleeOh gaaa the free market is a lie as its currently leading them to no one living there becuse they can not afford it makign it worthless.04/16/2014 - 3:24pm
Matthew WilsonIf you have not read http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2014/04/introducing-steam-gauge-ars-reveals-steams-most-popular-games/ you should. It is a bit stats heavy, but worth the read.04/16/2014 - 2:04pm
Matthew Wilsonthe issue is when is doesn't work it can screw over millions in new york city's case. more often than not it is better to let the free market run its course without market distortion.04/16/2014 - 9:36am
NeenekoTrue, and overdone stagnation is a problem. It is a tricky balance. It does not help that when it does work, no one notices. Most people here have benifited from rent controls and not even realized it.04/16/2014 - 9:23am
ZippyDSMleehttp://www.afterdawn.com/news/article.cfm/2014/04/15/riaa_files_civil_suit_against_megaupload04/16/2014 - 8:48am
ZippyDSMleeEither way you get stagnation as people can not afford the prices they set.04/16/2014 - 8:47am
Neenekowell, specifically it helps people already living there and hurts people who want to live there instead. As for 'way more hurt', majorities generally need less legal protection. yes it hurt more people then it helped, it was written for a minority04/16/2014 - 8:30am
MaskedPixelantehttp://torrentfreak.com/square-enix-drm-boosts-profits-and-its-here-to-stay-140415/ Square proves how incredibly out of touch they are by saying that DRM is the way of the future, and is here to stay.04/16/2014 - 8:29am
james_fudgeUnwinnable Weekly Telethon playing Metal Gear http://www.twitch.tv/rainydayletsplay04/16/2014 - 8:06am
ConsterTo be fair, there's so little left of the middle class that those numbers are skewing.04/16/2014 - 7:42am
Matthew Wilsonyes it help a sub section of the poor, but hurt both the middle and upper class. in the end way more people were hurt than helped. also, it hurt most poor people as well.04/16/2014 - 12:13am
SeanBJust goes to show what I have said for years. Your ability to have sex does not qualify you for parenthood.04/15/2014 - 9:21pm
NeenekoSo "worked" vs "failed" really comes down to who you think is more important and deserving04/15/2014 - 7:04pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician