UK Government Report Calls For Changes in Copyrights Laws

May 18, 2011

A review of copyright laws in the United Kingdom recommends that the government makes some serious changes that work in the digital age we now live in. A new report, requested by PM David Cameron who had concerns that current copyright laws had become outdated, has been released and it recommend some changes that the music, movie and other entertainment industries might find horrific.

The report penned by Professor Ian Hargreaves of Cardiff University suggests legalizing the practice of copying music and films. It also calls for a special agency to be set up (a Digital Copyright Exchange) to handle mediation between rights holders and those that want to license content. Other suggestions include loosening rules on fair use, parodies and other uses of content.

"My recommendations set out how the intellectual property framework can promote innovation and economic growth in the UK economy," said Hargreaves. "They are designed to enhance the economic potential of the UK's creative industries and to ensure that the emergence of high technology businesses, especially smaller businesses, in other sectors are not impeded by our IP laws."

On the Digital Copyright Exchange, Hargreaves calls for a senior figure to serve as the top mediator. Many of the reforms listed in this new report gad already been suggested in the 2006 Gowers Review of Intellectual Property. Obviously these recommendations were not implemented.

Content producers and free software advocates in the country support the proposals, with some urging the government to implement them as soon as possible.

Source: BBC


Comments

Re: UK Government Report Calls For Changes in Copyrights ...

Hmmmm.

"Another big idea in the report is the creation of a Digital Copyright Exchange. It would be responsible for so-called orphaned works, content that does not have an identifiable author."

As a hobby artist active in online art communities this frequently-proposed concept has always bothered me (mostly because people who want to steal will find it conveniently easy not to locate the original author of a work), but if it's very clearly defined . . .

Need more detail overall before I'd cast a judgement one way or another, but it looks like consumer rights to purchased copies of IP might become more prominent as a result of this, so I'm optimistic. Format shifting, YES, finally. I wonder if this could have long-term ramifications for service/hardware-restricted purchases like iTunes?

Re: UK Government Report Calls For Changes in Copyrights ...

Here is the problem with orphaned works. They were created when copyright was automatically applied rather than being something a person had to seek out. So when you have automatic copyright, there is no central wuthority on who owns the copyright and when it expires.

Where as before 1974, all one had to do to check a copyright was to look for the work in the US copyright office. If it was not there, you were free to use it. Now adays, you have have to do massive long term search projects to find the owner of anything.

E. Zachary Knight
Divine Knight Gaming

Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
E. Zachary KnightGamasutra explores the failure of Streetfighter X Tekken and has one of the best arguments against on-disk DLC I have ever read: http://tinyurl.com/d399ylu05/25/2012 - 1:46pm
ddrfr33kabout the xbox live hacks from last year, now we know: http://kotaku.com/5913228/report-how-scammers-are-stealing-xbox-live-accounts-and-what-they-do-with-them05/25/2012 - 12:31pm
tallimarhttp://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-57440902-94/microsoft-legal-win-over-google-may-signal-ceasefire/05/24/2012 - 10:17pm
ZippyDSMleeTIme or an operation!05/24/2012 - 6:43pm
ZippyDSMleePC parts are in wish me luck or hell!!05/24/2012 - 6:43pm
MaskedPixelante38 Studios and Big Huge Games are pretty much dead now. http://www.joystiq.com/2012/05/24/38-studios-and-big-huge-games-lay-off-entire-staffs05/24/2012 - 4:39pm
DorthLousActually, nop, I did miss the emoticon for some reason (getting used to pics?) and I didn't know you changed it since (since I posted previous to my shout and it was still there.) Anyhow, thanks for taking it out!05/23/2012 - 6:01pm
james_fudgeWell we were just testing it. but it is still on the submission to fight $pam.05/23/2012 - 5:48pm
E. Zachary KnightJames, No I don't have it. I was just wondering who does and why. More curiosity than anything.05/23/2012 - 5:38pm
james_fudgeDid you not see the emoticon and did you not see that it has already been changed back?05/23/2012 - 5:10pm
james_fudgeLOL05/23/2012 - 5:07pm
DorthLousWhy? Not shocked that people are barking to an additional hoop to jump through when posting from their already logged in account or just mentionning this to try to paint me as one always complaining?05/23/2012 - 4:45pm
james_fudgebig shock there ;)05/23/2012 - 4:30pm
DorthLousI'll add my voice to those wanting it gone :S I'm already logged in, I don't need a captch'a. That's for those registering.05/23/2012 - 3:54pm
james_fudgeEt tu EZK?!?05/23/2012 - 3:51pm
Craig R.I'm a One Man Quorum! And it's working for me now, thanks. :)05/23/2012 - 3:48pm
E. Zachary KnightHow do we determine who get's the game/captcha thingy? Is there a certain posting threshhold users have to meet before it is turned off?05/23/2012 - 2:25pm
james_fudgeGive it a chance, we're still adjusting it ;)05/23/2012 - 11:20am
james_fudgeOne does not a Quorum make Craig.05/23/2012 - 11:16am
Craig R.If I complete the stupid game, and it just deletes my comment, what's the point?05/23/2012 - 11:15am

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician