Catholic Bishops Conference Supports R18+ Rating

May 26, 2011 -

While we have no idea where most Australian politicians stand on yesterday's draft proposal for an R18+ video game classification, the new adult rating is getting some unexpected support from the Catholic Church. According to a GameSpot report, the Australian Catholic Bishops Conference said that they welcomed yesterday's proposed guidelines for adult rating for video games. Unfortunately not all religious groups agree: the Australian Christian Lobby describe the changes as "frightening."

In a press statement, the Conference, which carries the influence of the Catholic Church in Australia, said that it would support the rating because it could not achieve its preference of having adult material banned. A tepid approval for sure, but the church admits that it is better to have such content under a proper ratings system that parents can use.

"In an ideal world, the sort of material that is included in R18+ or higher classification films and computer games would never be seen in a civilised democracy. However, it is not an ideal world and, in the real world in which we live, such material unfortunately is produced and is available, sometimes legally and often illegally, within our society," the press statement said. "The preferred position of the Catholic Church is that R18+ material should not be available. But if such an outcome is not achievable then the Australian National Classification Scheme should include an R18+ classification category for computer games."

The Australian Christian Lobby described the proposed guidelines as "contrary to the interests of parents and children."

The draft guidelines were released by the office of the Federal Minister for Home Affairs Brendan O’Connor yesterday. MP's are expected to vote on the proposal - or at least discuss it or revise it - at the July SCAG meeting.

Source: GameSpot


Comments

Re: Catholic Bishops Conference Supports R18+ Rating

"In an ideal world, the sort of material that is included in R18+ or higher classification films and computer games would never be seen in a civilised democracy"

I don't think democracy is what you're thinking of here...

Re: Catholic Bishops Conference Supports R18+ Rating

Nope, they are speaking/wishing for a theocracy.

 

Hunting the shadows of the troubled dreams.

Hunting the shadows of the troubled dreams.

Re: Catholic Bishops Conference Supports R18+ Rating

Whilst I will give them credit for having a little more sence than most religious fanatics, they still try to cover up one "bad" thing with a "good" thing.

Whilst they support an R18 rating (the "good" thing), they'd still rather ban everything they oppose outright (the "bad" thing). I'm not so sure if I'd want the support of a fanatic one minute, only to face their scourn at choices that don't necessarily affect them the next.

Simply put: They're a rather unpredictable "ally". Not someone I'd put reliance on, personally. So whilst their "support" may be nice, it may not last long, either.

-- Randi Tastix

Re: Catholic Bishops Conference Supports R18+ Rating

I notice that they admited they would rather ban what they don't like instead of letting people make their own choices.

Hunting the shadows of the troubled dreams.

Hunting the shadows of the troubled dreams.

Re: Catholic Bishops Conference Supports R18+ Rating

At least they're willing to push for a real solution instead of an outright ban.

Re: Catholic Bishops Conference Supports R18+ Rating

Only because they know it'd be a losing fight. Give them the chance and they'll try to make it a "Backdoor" ban somehow.

 

Hunting the shadows of the troubled dreams.

Hunting the shadows of the troubled dreams.

Re: Catholic Bishops Conference Supports R18+ Rating

I'm just glad to see that the good Father Guido Sarducci is still working hard.

Re: Catholic Bishops Conference Supports R18+ Rating

Wow, quite unexpected.

 

They have far more sense than the politicians in office.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Goth_SkunkAnd just to be clear, that remark is firmly tongue-in-cheek, while also echoing statements made by those critical of GamerGate.06/30/2015 - 4:43pm
Goth_SkunkA fair point Andrew, and you are a very reasonable feminist. Though I would suggest that if you don't wish to be associated with the toxic elements present in feminism, I recommend disassociating yourself from them. Maybe call yourself something else? :^)06/30/2015 - 4:42pm
Andrew EisenGoth - By the by, you know how GamerGate doesn't like being painted with a broad brush? Well, I hate to speak for anyone but myself but I'm pretty confident in saying we feminists don't care for it much either.06/30/2015 - 4:10pm
Andrew EisenWell of course. Being a feminist doesn't mean rape can never be depicted in fiction.06/30/2015 - 4:03pm
InfophileIn fiction, it depends on the context. It's very easy to get "wrong," but there are cases where feminists have approved of how it's been shown (eg. the scene with Honor Harrington in the new compilation comic)06/30/2015 - 4:02pm
Andrew EisenThat would be an interesting alternate film though. Ray became a Ghostbuster to get rid of the spooks that had been sexually assaulting him.06/30/2015 - 4:00pm
Andrew EisenHe's not powerless against ghosts. That's very firmly established by that point in the movie.06/30/2015 - 3:57pm
Andrew EisenSo, if in the new movie, McCarthy or one of the other Ghostbusters has a dream where a pretty ghost goes down on her, I don't predict outrage (other than from those silly random no-name numbnuts on Twitter).06/30/2015 - 3:56pm
Goth_SkunkDream or not, it's still a scene that depicts a victim powerless to stop his attacker from engaging in an act of sex upon him. Even if he enjoys himself, it's technically rape. Hypothetically, he could feel traumatized afterwards.06/30/2015 - 3:55pm
Andrew EisenWell, he could always, you know, grab a proton pack and bust that rapey ghost! But again, it's still pretty clearly a dream.06/30/2015 - 3:53pm
ZippyDSMleeSo what dose GG stand for if its not been taken over my bigots??06/30/2015 - 3:52pm
Goth_SkunkI am assuming he's powerless to stop it, yes. I have no reason to believe a ghost would find itself in any way obligated to obey laws of corporeal beings. And it's not just about consent, but also about the means to stop the person engaging the sex.06/30/2015 - 3:51pm
Andrew EisenRape in real life? Absolutely (though "tizzy" isn't the right word). In fiction? Depends on how it's used.06/30/2015 - 3:50pm
Infophile"...it's rape. And that tends to send feminists into a tizzy." You say that as if rape isn't something to get into a tizzy about.06/30/2015 - 3:48pm
Andrew EisenBesides, it's pretty clearly a dream. Ray and the ghost are in some unknown bedroom. Then it cuts to Ray and the other guys in the firehouse beds with Ray rolling over in his sleep and falling off the bed. Looks like Egon is having a weird dream too.06/30/2015 - 3:46pm
Andrew EisenYou're assuming he's powerless to stop it. Maybe saying "no" or something would have stopped the ghost. Anyway, so, in your opinion, sex (oral or otherwise) is rape unless there's explicit consent?06/30/2015 - 3:44pm
Goth_SkunkBut, to be completely fair, that fact never dawned on me until 15 minutes ago.06/30/2015 - 3:43pm
Goth_SkunkAbsolutely. He doesn't consent, and is powerless to stop it because his attacker isn't corporeal. The fact that he's enjoying himself does not change the fact that it's technically rape.06/30/2015 - 3:42pm
Andrew EisenAlways came off as a dream to me.06/30/2015 - 3:40pm
Andrew EisenThat scene really reads to you like Stantz was being raped?06/30/2015 - 3:39pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician