Tapjoy Complains About Apple's Ban on 'Pay-Per-Install'

June 1, 2011 -

Middleware company Tapjoy has complained publicly that Apple's ban of "pay per install" apps and promotions has adversely affected its business and a majority of iOS developers who want to use it. The ban was put in place because of Apple's concerns that developers were paying Tapjoy to boost their game's ranking in the list of top 25 apps.

When an app uses this system, a user is incentivized in some way to install another unrelated app. The developer of the unrelated app then shares the revenue with the original app.

Tapjoy argues that incentivized promotions are "commonplace" and allow developers to create an additional revenue stream. The debate may be that Apple felt like it wasn't getting its fair share of that stream. According to VentureBeat, Tapjoy CEO Mihir Shah attempted to institute a compromise, where a cap "prevented developers from unfairly breaking into the top 25," but it was rejected by Apple.

A Tapjoy survey of developers showed that almost half had begun to receive a large number of customer complaints because of the "sudden inability" to earn in-game currency from installing other apps.

From Apple's perspective, this is a move to bring back fairness of app rankings.

Source: GameIndustry.biz


Comments

Re: Tapjoy Complains About Apple's Ban on 'Pay-Per-Install'

sooo apple banned payed for app advertisements (which no one likes anyways) and someones mad because of it?

tbh i'd pirate an app ( that advertises other things to me that are totally unrelated before i'd waste money on buying ads. and tbh if its worth pirating, its not even worth having, so i just won't have it :) ). unless they somehow (and i've yet to see it happen in small cell phone sized programs) make it completely out of my way so i don't get stuck accidentally clicking it. (EA has a good idea with intigrated little ads that don't do much but ADD to the games immersion)

i mean angry birds advertising angry birds isn't bad IMO as it shows me that theres other versions and neat merchandise i can get if i want. and they still keep it out of my face mostwhat so i dont' have the off chance of clicking it by mistake (Mighty eagle aside, that icon is a nuisance)

i hate ITunes with a passion, i truly do, as it blows on a Windows based system (lockups, memory hogging, crashes, etc..) but i ditched my Android phone for the Iphone ASAP when i could (and payed only $20 to upgrade early... well worth it though)

part of the reason.. the apps on android are so either compeltely useless, or ad ridden it makes them hard to use at all.

so suffering Itunes is hardly a pain, since i can ignore its ads unless i WANT to see them, same goes for other bits on the phone.

i do hope Apple flips them right off.. throw a brother bird at them and knock down their little wall of consumer paid for advertising to said consumer.

if i want an ad shoved in my face every 5 seconds i'll get cable or sattelite.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Craig R.Ok, my internal debate was short-lived. If Win10 is still a year out, I'm not waiting that long for an SSD, so on Win7 I will remain.09/30/2014 - 7:52pm
Matthew Wilsonits called windows 10, and I am happy to get the start menu back.09/30/2014 - 7:18pm
Jessy HartIs this stuff about Windows 10 legit? Is it actually called Windows 10 or is it just some stupid joke?09/30/2014 - 6:57pm
ZippyDSMleeSo I been trying to play Bioshock Infinite I got all the DLC,ect but do not want the extras to make your charatcer over powered from the start.....they force you to take them which is quite annoying......09/30/2014 - 6:45pm
Craig R.I need to upgrade to an SSD, still seriously debating moving to Win8.1 from 7 at the same time09/30/2014 - 6:07pm
Craig R.Win10 is probably Win8.1 with more cleanup and the Start button back.09/30/2014 - 6:06pm
Sora-ChanAhh, it's just weird seeing someone's post all of a sudden have replies from days prior before it was posted due to that.09/30/2014 - 5:49pm
MechaTama31sora: I broke the ordering intentionally, as AE's and my conversation had squeezed the text boxes down to be quite slim. I replied to an earlier post of his instead of the one I was actually replying to.09/30/2014 - 5:46pm
MechaTama31So, 9 would have been the good one, but they are skipping it to do two crap ones in a row?09/30/2014 - 5:41pm
Sora-ChanSo, judging from the poll post for #gamergate, it looks like too many thread replies breaks the ordering of posts, as seen with the recent post from Infophile.09/30/2014 - 5:31pm
Andrew EisenOr no! It wasn't Y3K compliant. Microsoft thought it best to super future proof its OS and skipped straight to 10 which is Y3K compliant!09/30/2014 - 5:01pm
Andrew EisenJust tell them it wasn't Y2K compliant.09/30/2014 - 5:00pm
Craig R.Looking forward to having to explain to coworkers down the road what ever happened to 9 *sigh*09/30/2014 - 4:57pm
Craig R.2k was crap. XP was solid, 7 is good, 8.1 is actually really good once you make it look like 7 :)09/30/2014 - 4:52pm
Sora-Chan@MP As someone who has used each version of windows since 3.1... I prefer Vista over 7 for various reasons. The only thing I give 7 over Vista is preformance. They really screwed up a bunch of things when making 7. Also, XP was a pain. 2k was better.09/30/2014 - 4:13pm
Jessy Hart@E. Zachary Knight Is that show called Pac-Man and the Ghostly Adventures?09/30/2014 - 3:34pm
IanCWin 8 isn't bad, it just can't decide whether to be a desktop OS or a tablet OS.09/30/2014 - 2:40pm
IanCI think its a way of getting round giving it free to Win 8 users...09/30/2014 - 2:39pm
MaskedPixelanteWindows alternates between bad and good versions. XP was good, Vista sucked, 7 was good, 8 sucked, therefore 10 will suck, QED.09/30/2014 - 2:18pm
E. Zachary KnightPerhaps they are calling it "10" because on a scale of 1-10 of how awesome it is, it is a clear 10.09/30/2014 - 2:06pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician