Senators Successfully Bully Apple on DUI Apps

June 10, 2011 -

In late March four United States Senators voiced outrage over iPhone and Android apps that alerted users to local DUI stops being conducted by the police. It bothered them so much that the four got together and penned strongly worded letters to the CEO's of both Apple and Google asking them to ban these apps from their respective marketplaces.

Three months later and one company has complied with the wishes of Senators Harry Reid (D-Nev.), Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.), Frank Lautenberg (D-N.J.), and Tom Udall (D-N.M.). According to revised app developer guidelines uncovered by Mac Rumors, section 22.8 offers an addendum:

"Apps which contain DUI checkpoints that are not published by law enforcement agencies, or encourage and enable drunk driving, will be rejected."

Now the first point that anyone with even two working brain cells should take issue with is the line about app developers "encouraging drunk driving."  To suggest such a thing is pretty insane. The second issue is what data these apps provide. Sure, some of it comes from crowd sourcing (users sharing info with other users), but the checkpoint notifications mostly come from the very law enforcement agencies conducting these DUI stops - because by law they have to publish that information to the public (in most states). Law enforcement -- as a rule -- believes that publishing such information is a deterrent against drunk driving. They do it for the same reason they tell local TV and radio stations about DUI checkpoints and stops on holiday weekends. It stops people from driving drunk.

But none of that matters because the Senate has successfully bullied Apple into banning these apps altogether. It's one of the many reasons why people (right or wrong) want to jailbreak their iOS devices..

Source: Edible Apple by way on Uncharted NES.


Comments

Re: Senators Successfully Bully Apple on DUI Apps

I guess this means that Grand Theft Auto-like video games will be banned?  This site fails, again, to stay on-topic.  If you have to put a spin on the content to make it relevant, please do so.

This sort of lame-brained stuff is exactly why iOS will lose to Android.  All the developers I know are getting seriously turned off by Apple's approach to application deployment.  They sink a lot of time and money into an iOS app and it all hinges on Apple approving the app.  Meanwhile, Apple keeps adding new line items to their encumbered EULA, which is worse than most DRM schemes.  Android apps, on the other hand, are instantly available in the Market as soon as the developer uploads it.  Granted, Google can come along later and remove it, but it is better than Apple's draconian approach that can sink an entire business on a whim before it even gets out of the starting gate.  Also, there is no one to ask at Apple BEFORE developing the app to see if it has a chance of being approved in the first place.

But that's only one reason that developers are flocking to Android in droves.

- Left4Dead

Why are zombies always eating brains? I want to see zombies that eat toes for a living. Undead-related pun intended.

- Left4Dead Why are zombies always eating brains? I want to see zombies that eat toes for a living. Undead-related pun intended.

Re: Senators Successfully Bully Apple on DUI Apps

I´m not surprised. Recently I heard that in Illinois you can get a 15 years sentence for videotaping police officers without their permission, despite the government can tape your phone line and that´s perfectly OK with them.

Suddenly Mexico is a better place to live.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Will Target Australia sell the next GTA game upon its release?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Goth_Skunkfeed. Additionally, I'm baffled by the irony of someone named 'Infophile' taking a Mary Sue article seriously. Ignoring that I won't give that site a second of my time, that article headline is blatant clickbait and should be ignored on principle.07/31/2015 - 2:58pm
Goth_SkunkI agree with Benohawk: The title of the article meant that the article was worth ignoring. Alas, when 9 additional sites pop up with similarly titled articles of their own, it reeks of collusion and an attempt by the press at large to bite the hands that07/31/2015 - 2:56pm
Andrew EisenAh, okay.07/31/2015 - 2:46pm
benohawkI'm saying that the refrence in the article to the old title would need to be changed well the primary point of the article would be kept the same. Not something that should be an issue if the objective wasn't to be provocative.07/31/2015 - 2:41pm
Andrew EisenYou're saying the article should be altered to fit a different title. I want to know what title you find more appropriate for the copy as is.07/31/2015 - 2:34pm
benohawkIt would take a minor rewrite to the article, but I'd call it 'What is a Gamer' but go for the same point. you don't have to sell to jerks07/31/2015 - 2:33pm
Andrew EisenI still say "clickbait" is thrown around way too casually, to the point where it's completely meaningless. That aside, what alternate title would you suggest?07/31/2015 - 2:22pm
benohawkt was still delibrate clickait, something I would expect from a Gawker outlet, the article would of likely been much better recieved with a nicer title07/31/2015 - 2:18pm
Andrew EisenProvocative title to be sure but I didn't find it inaccurate or not reflective of its text.07/31/2015 - 2:12pm
benohawkGamasutra shouldn't of gotten clicks for the article until they had published under an accurate name instead of some pathetic clickbaiting07/31/2015 - 2:09pm
benohawkThe title of the article meant that the article was worth ignoring, not launching a massive campaign to try and end the site it was on.07/31/2015 - 2:08pm
Andrew EisenI will Ouija him my unceasing indignation!07/31/2015 - 1:59pm
Infophile@AE: The fact that he's dead does a good job of ensuring he won't hear it.07/31/2015 - 1:59pm
InfophileGood to hear. Just wish everyone offended felt that way07/31/2015 - 1:58pm
Andrew EisenRoger Ebert will never hear the end of my disdain for his I Spit On Your Grave review! http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/i-spit-on-your-grave-198007/31/2015 - 1:57pm
Big PermI don't support the email campaigns. I wouldn't support a comics venue getting them because of being offended, so it'd be hipocritical for me to do it to those who offend me07/31/2015 - 1:53pm
Infophile(cont'd) if it could be proven, it wouldn't merit anywhere near what Alexander has gone through.)07/31/2015 - 1:49pm
InfophileYeah, we can't prove or disprove it. My beef is with those who use the assumed intent to justify the actions taken against Gamasutra and Alexander. If it can't be proven, it shouldn't be retaliated against like that. (Hell, with how mild this was, even...07/31/2015 - 1:49pm
Andrew EisenNo problem. We just prefer to keep the front page clean.07/31/2015 - 1:43pm
Big PermAndrew- Alright, didn't know before.07/31/2015 - 1:42pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician