Illegal Streaming Bill Clears Senate Judiciary Committee

June 16, 2011 -

A bill that proposes a felony charge to anyone that "illegally streams copyrighted content online" has been approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee today and will head to the full Senate for a vote. The bill, S. 978 (or "Commercial Felony Streaming Act"), brings the penalties for illegal streaming in line with the penalties for illegal downloading. What used to be a misdemeanor will now become a serious crime if the law gets passed. In other words, illegal streaming could get you a five year sentence in jail. Websites that offer illegally streams of copyrighted content 10 or more times during an 180-day period can be prosecuted if the bill becomes law, although it is unclear how the bill deals with individual streamers.

“From the perspective of video retailers, a sale or rental lost because a potential customer already viewed the motion picture or television program from an infringing copy is just as damaging as a sale or rental lost because the customer viewed the motion picture or television program from an infringing public performance,” said Bo Andersen, president and CEO of the Entertainment Merchants Association.

John Fithian, president and CEO of the National Association of Theater Owners also thinks the bill is a good idea. When the bill was first introduced he said: “It is high time that the punishment fit the crime. Illegal streaming of stolen content is growing and poses a threat to the profitability of movie theaters and to the jobs of our 160,000 employees in the U.S.”

There doesn't seem to be a provision to punish consumers for sharing services such as Netflix with other users, at least. That may change in time for a number of reasons, not the least of which is the popularity of Netflix and many consumers using it as a replacement for traditional cable.

Source: Home Media Magazine


Comments

Re: Illegal Streaming Bill Clears Senate Judiciary Committee

Yes thats exactly what the states need is another non-violent criminal costing the state $50k a year to eat and poop in solitude in a jail cell.

Dumbest idea EVER!

Re: Illegal Streaming Bill Clears Senate Judiciary Committee

Welcome to Dealing with the Government with our hosts: Winn, Dewy, Fookem and Howe.

 

Hunting the shadows of the troubled dreams.

Hunting the shadows of the troubled dreams.

Re: Illegal Streaming Bill Clears Senate Judiciary Committee

hard jail time for watching a stream but Tony Hayward (ex-BP exec) gets to live in lavish luxury for the rest of his days for poisoning the Gulf.

the influence of the MAFIAA on Congress (mostly Dems) is totally out of control.

Re: Illegal Streaming Bill Clears Senate Judiciary Committee

There's no need to drabg this into a democrat vs republican issue. This is a political issue, simple as that.

Re: Illegal Streaming Bill Clears Senate Judiciary Committee

yA BUT THE DEMS HAVE CLOSER TIES TO THE MEDIA MAFFIA

 

damn caps lock ><


I have a dream, break the chains of copy right oppression! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/2010/05/21/cigital-disobedience/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: Illegal Streaming Bill Clears Senate Judiciary Committee

They want to throw 5 year olds into jail for lip sync videos too. Ever hear of a term, "regulatory capture"? Yeah, US government fail.

Re: Illegal Streaming Bill Clears Senate Judiciary Committee

Why not define and limit it to ad/donation/direct sell tpes of streaming. At least that way they can not fine everyone with a thought......


I have a dream, break the chains of copy right oppression! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/2010/05/21/cigital-disobedience/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: Illegal Streaming Bill Clears Senate Judiciary Committee

And in conclusion those who would try to watch a sports team other than the one shown in their area, thus causing the companies that have ridiculous monopolies with the pro leagues to lose money will go to jail for 5 years like the filthy criminals that they are. 

You know the US government is corrupt but it is really sad whenever something super transparent like this happens. 

Re: Illegal Streaming Bill Clears Senate Judiciary Committee

Illegal streaming of stolen content

If I bought the box collection of Battlestar Galactica, converted the video and then streamed it to my friends on a private channel, would that fit? Personally, I don't see the difference between setting up a private stream of something I own and inviting my friends into the channel, and inviting them to the apartment to watch it on my TV- in both cases, I'm offering access to viewing a medium to people close to me who don't own it.

Re: Illegal Streaming Bill Clears Senate Judiciary Committee

Is anyone here from Oregon? If so, contact Senator Ron Wyden with your concerns about this bill. He is the one who is blocking the PROTECT IP Act, so if you let him know about the problems with this bill, and maybe he can hold this one up too.

Re: Illegal Streaming Bill Clears Senate Judiciary Committee

I'll guess that their definition of streaming a well as what is and isn't legal is pretty loosely defined.

Re: Illegal Streaming Bill Clears Senate Judiciary Committee

"It is high time that the punishment fit the crime."

If only that were true in the least.

Re: Illegal Streaming Bill Clears Senate Judiciary Committee

Seriously, watching a stream for jail time? A more appropriate punishment would be to pay a fine thats just large enough to encourage people to buy the media.

-Austin from Oregon

Feel free to check out my blog.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Will Code Avarice's Paranautical Activity make its way back onto Steam?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
NeenekoJust look at how interviews are handled. Media tends to pit someone who is at best a journalist, but usually entertainer, against an expert, and it is presented and percieved as if they are equals.10/25/2014 - 7:38am
Neeneko@MC - Focusing on perpetrator does nothing for prevention, the media and public lack the domain knowledge and event details to draw any useful conclusions. All we get are armchair risk experts.10/25/2014 - 7:36am
Neeneko@AE - no name or picture, I like it.10/25/2014 - 7:34am
PHX Corp@MW and AE The news media needs to stop promoting the Shooters. period10/25/2014 - 7:16am
Andrew EisenWhen I write about these massacres, I don't use the shooter's name or picture. I'm not saying everyone has to play it that way but that's how I prefer to do it.10/25/2014 - 12:44am
Andrew EisenYep, it's why the news media stopped spotlighting numbnuts who run out on the field during sporting events.10/25/2014 - 12:01am
Matthew Wilsonin media research its called the copycat effect. it simply says that if the news covers one mass shooting shooter, it increases the likelihood of another person going on a mass shooting.10/25/2014 - 12:00am
Andrew EisenAgreed. It bugs me that I know the names, faces and personal histories of a bunch of mass shooters but I couldn't tell you the name of or recognize a photo of a single one of their victims.10/24/2014 - 11:51pm
AvalongodAgree with Quiknkold. @Mecha...if that worked we would have figured out how to prevent these long ago.10/24/2014 - 11:32pm
MechaCrashUnfortunately, you have to focus on the perpetrator to figure out the whys so you can try to prevent it from happening again.10/24/2014 - 10:55pm
quiknkoldpoor girl. poor victims. rather focus on them then the shooter. giving too much thought to the monster takes away from the victims.10/24/2014 - 10:15pm
Andrew EisenFor what it's worth, early reports are painting the motive as "he was pissed that a particular girl wouldn't date him."10/24/2014 - 10:12pm
quiknkoldwell then I suck as a man cause I ask for help when necessary :P10/24/2014 - 10:07pm
Technogeek(That said, mostly I was making the smartass evopsych comment because your post seemed like the kind of just-so story that has come to dominate 99% of its usage.)10/24/2014 - 10:04pm
TechnogeekHell, Liam Neeson built his modern career around it. Cultural factors likely play a far greater role than you appear willing to admit.10/24/2014 - 10:03pm
TechnogeekSeriously, though, the idea of "because women are protectors and that's why they never commit school shootings" is, at best, grossly overreductive. There's nothing inherently feminine about being willing to kill in order to protect one's offspring.10/24/2014 - 10:03pm
MechaCrashThe "toxic masculinity" thing refers to how you have to SUCK IT UP AND BE A MAN because seeking help is seen as weakness, which means you suck at manliness, so it builds and builds and builds until something finally snaps.10/24/2014 - 10:01pm
quiknkoldthere, I'm done. And thats what Christmas is all about, Charlie Brown10/24/2014 - 9:54pm
quiknkoldand I am not spouting Evopsych, technogeek. tbh I never heard the phrase till you said it. I'm going off my observations.10/24/2014 - 9:54pm
quiknkoldmoreover, the guy who did this isnt even white. He was native american according to the news report I read. Also that he went for a specific target. That's a much different picture than a certain Sandy Hook guy who will not be named10/24/2014 - 9:53pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician