Illegal Streaming Bill Clears Senate Judiciary Committee

June 16, 2011 -

A bill that proposes a felony charge to anyone that "illegally streams copyrighted content online" has been approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee today and will head to the full Senate for a vote. The bill, S. 978 (or "Commercial Felony Streaming Act"), brings the penalties for illegal streaming in line with the penalties for illegal downloading. What used to be a misdemeanor will now become a serious crime if the law gets passed. In other words, illegal streaming could get you a five year sentence in jail. Websites that offer illegally streams of copyrighted content 10 or more times during an 180-day period can be prosecuted if the bill becomes law, although it is unclear how the bill deals with individual streamers.

“From the perspective of video retailers, a sale or rental lost because a potential customer already viewed the motion picture or television program from an infringing copy is just as damaging as a sale or rental lost because the customer viewed the motion picture or television program from an infringing public performance,” said Bo Andersen, president and CEO of the Entertainment Merchants Association.

John Fithian, president and CEO of the National Association of Theater Owners also thinks the bill is a good idea. When the bill was first introduced he said: “It is high time that the punishment fit the crime. Illegal streaming of stolen content is growing and poses a threat to the profitability of movie theaters and to the jobs of our 160,000 employees in the U.S.”

There doesn't seem to be a provision to punish consumers for sharing services such as Netflix with other users, at least. That may change in time for a number of reasons, not the least of which is the popularity of Netflix and many consumers using it as a replacement for traditional cable.

Source: Home Media Magazine


Comments

Re: Illegal Streaming Bill Clears Senate Judiciary Committee

Yes thats exactly what the states need is another non-violent criminal costing the state $50k a year to eat and poop in solitude in a jail cell.

Dumbest idea EVER!

Re: Illegal Streaming Bill Clears Senate Judiciary Committee

Welcome to Dealing with the Government with our hosts: Winn, Dewy, Fookem and Howe.

 

Hunting the shadows of the troubled dreams.

Hunting the shadows of the troubled dreams.

Re: Illegal Streaming Bill Clears Senate Judiciary Committee

hard jail time for watching a stream but Tony Hayward (ex-BP exec) gets to live in lavish luxury for the rest of his days for poisoning the Gulf.

the influence of the MAFIAA on Congress (mostly Dems) is totally out of control.

Re: Illegal Streaming Bill Clears Senate Judiciary Committee

There's no need to drabg this into a democrat vs republican issue. This is a political issue, simple as that.

Re: Illegal Streaming Bill Clears Senate Judiciary Committee

yA BUT THE DEMS HAVE CLOSER TIES TO THE MEDIA MAFFIA

 

damn caps lock ><


I have a dream, break the chains of copy right oppression! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/2010/05/21/cigital-disobedience/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: Illegal Streaming Bill Clears Senate Judiciary Committee

They want to throw 5 year olds into jail for lip sync videos too. Ever hear of a term, "regulatory capture"? Yeah, US government fail.

Re: Illegal Streaming Bill Clears Senate Judiciary Committee

Why not define and limit it to ad/donation/direct sell tpes of streaming. At least that way they can not fine everyone with a thought......


I have a dream, break the chains of copy right oppression! http://zippydsmlee.wordpress.com/2010/05/21/cigital-disobedience/


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

Re: Illegal Streaming Bill Clears Senate Judiciary Committee

And in conclusion those who would try to watch a sports team other than the one shown in their area, thus causing the companies that have ridiculous monopolies with the pro leagues to lose money will go to jail for 5 years like the filthy criminals that they are. 

You know the US government is corrupt but it is really sad whenever something super transparent like this happens. 

Re: Illegal Streaming Bill Clears Senate Judiciary Committee

Illegal streaming of stolen content

If I bought the box collection of Battlestar Galactica, converted the video and then streamed it to my friends on a private channel, would that fit? Personally, I don't see the difference between setting up a private stream of something I own and inviting my friends into the channel, and inviting them to the apartment to watch it on my TV- in both cases, I'm offering access to viewing a medium to people close to me who don't own it.

Re: Illegal Streaming Bill Clears Senate Judiciary Committee

Is anyone here from Oregon? If so, contact Senator Ron Wyden with your concerns about this bill. He is the one who is blocking the PROTECT IP Act, so if you let him know about the problems with this bill, and maybe he can hold this one up too.

Re: Illegal Streaming Bill Clears Senate Judiciary Committee

I'll guess that their definition of streaming a well as what is and isn't legal is pretty loosely defined.

Re: Illegal Streaming Bill Clears Senate Judiciary Committee

"It is high time that the punishment fit the crime."

If only that were true in the least.

Re: Illegal Streaming Bill Clears Senate Judiciary Committee

Seriously, watching a stream for jail time? A more appropriate punishment would be to pay a fine thats just large enough to encourage people to buy the media.

-Austin from Oregon

Feel free to check out my blog.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Is King right? Should all games adopt the free-to-play model?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MaskedPixelanteNumber 3: Night Dive was brought to the attention of the public by a massive game recovery, and yet most of their released catalogue consists of games that other people did the hard work of getting re-released.04/17/2014 - 8:46pm
MaskedPixelanteNumber 2: If Humongous Entertainment wanted their stuff on Steam, why didn't they talk to their parent company, which does have a number of games published on Steam?04/17/2014 - 8:45pm
MaskedPixelanteNumber 1: When Night Dive spent the better part of a year teasing the return of true classics, having their big content dump be edutainment is kind of a kick in the stomach.04/17/2014 - 8:44pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://www.giantbomb.com/articles/jeff-gerstmann-heads-to-new-york-takes-questions/1100-4900/ He talks about the future games press and the games industry. It is worth your time even though it is a bit long, and stay for the QA. There are some good QA04/17/2014 - 5:28pm
IanCErm so they shouldn't sell edutainment at all? Why?04/17/2014 - 4:42pm
MaskedPixelanteNot that linkable, go onto Steam and there's stuff like Pajama Sam on the front-page, courtesy of Night Dive.04/17/2014 - 4:13pm
Andrew EisenOkay, again, please, please, PLEASE get in a habit of linking to whatever you're talking about.04/17/2014 - 4:05pm
MaskedPixelanteAnother round of Night Dive teasing and promising turns out to be stupid edutainment games. Thanks for wasting all our time, guys. See you never.04/17/2014 - 3:44pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the consequences were not only foreseeable, but very likely. anyone who understood supply demand curvs knew that was going to happen. SF has been a econ/trade hub for the last hundred years.04/17/2014 - 2:45pm
Andrew EisenMixedPixelante - Would you like to expand on that?04/17/2014 - 2:43pm
MaskedPixelanteWell, I am officially done with Night Dive Studios. Unless they can bring something worthwhile back, I'm never buying another game from them.04/17/2014 - 2:29pm
PHX Corphttp://www.msnbc.com/ronan-farrow/watch/video-games-continue-to-break-the-mold-229561923638 Ronan Farrow Daily on Video games breaking the mold04/17/2014 - 2:13pm
NeenekoAh yes, because by building something nice they were just asking for people to come push them out. Consequences are protested all the time when other people are implementing them.04/17/2014 - 2:06pm
Matthew Wilsonok than they should not protest when the consequences of that choice occur.04/17/2014 - 1:06pm
NeenekoIf people want tall buildings, plenty of other cities with them. Part of freedom and markets is communities deciding what they do and do not want built in their collective space.04/17/2014 - 12:55pm
Sora-ChanI realize that they have ways getting around it, but one reason might be due to earthquakes.04/17/2014 - 4:42am
Matthew WilsonSF is a tech/ economic/ trade center it should be mostly tail building. this whole problem is because of the lack of tail buildings. How would having tail apartment buildings destroy SF? having tail buildings has not runed other cities around the US/world04/16/2014 - 10:51pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the issue is you can not build upwards anywhere in SF at the moment, and no you would not. You would bring prices to where they should have been before the market distortion. those prices are not economic or socially healthy.04/16/2014 - 10:46pm
ZippyDSMleeYou still wind up pushing people out of the non high rise aeras but tis least damage you can do all things considered.04/16/2014 - 10:26pm
ZippyDSMleeANd by mindlessly building upward you make it like every place else hurting property prices,ect,ect. You'll have to slowly segment the region into aeras where you will never build upward then alow some aeras to build upward.04/16/2014 - 10:25pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician