Survey: Average Gamer Will Spend Nearly Two Years Playing Games

July 14, 2011 -

According to a survey conducted by video game price comparison site Playr2.com, gamers age 18 - 40 may end up dedicating almost two years of their lives playing video games. The company conducted a survey of 1,452 of its members, asking a variety of questions about their gaming habits. The survey found that the average gamer will spend about 1.8 years of their life playing games on various platforms. 

The average starting age of gamers was around 9.1 years. Most said they spend an average of 9.2 hours a week playing games. Most surveyed said they planned on giving up gaming when they turned 45 years old.

Playr2.com founder Simon Kilby said that the company conducted the survey because they were curious about how much time customers were actually spending playing games. Kilby added that he expects those times to vary depending on the type of gamer being examined. For example, a Madden player probably spends less time playing games than someone that plays a full-blown RPG or an MMO.

Clearly the survey is unscientific and the evidence is anecdotal, but it's interesting to see numbers laid out in years instead of hours.

Source: Joystick Division


Comments

Re: Survey: Average Gamer Will Spend Nearly Two Years ...

2 years is referring to total time in their lives, I assume. Sleeping should be somewhere around 30 years of your life. This just shows gaming is a large part of peoples lives.

As for planning to stop at 45, I doubt it. Its just like kids thinking they will have to consciously stop playing with toys one day, or the notion that turning 18 somehow flips a switch that makes you an adult. These are things that change gradually over time. Youll grow out of games, or not. Planning a date to stop playing is self-delusion.

Re: Survey: Average Gamer Will Spend Nearly Two Years ...

"Most surveyed said they planned on giving up gaming when they turned 45 years old."

People have specific ages at which they 'plan' on giving up gaming? Really? I assume that they insisted on an answer as to when the participants planned to give up, and the average was 45. Because, seriously?

Re: Survey: Average Gamer Will Spend Nearly Two Years ...

I've spent about 20 years playing video games. 

Re: Survey: Average Gamer Will Spend Nearly Two Years ...

Two years out of... how long?

Does it list how long each gamer has been gaming? If the age margin is 22 f***ing years, a mere 10th of it isn't exactly rageworthy. You'd probably find people spending more "years" watching television.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Did Microsoft pay too much ($2.5 billion) for Minecraft developer Mojang?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Technogeek"It also doesn't mean you're obligated to stop harassment from all gamers that are doing so." I'd say you're certainly obligated to call them out when you see it happening.09/20/2014 - 5:17pm
SleakerNow if you disagree with anything in my last 2 posts then we obviously have a difference in world view, and wont come to any sort of agreement. I'm fine with that, maybe some people aren't?09/20/2014 - 5:09pm
SleakerIt also doesn't mean that just because a news outlet says that Gamers are the problem and you self-identify as a Gamer, you're immediately the problem. It also doesn't mean you're obligated to stop harassment from all gamers that are doing so.09/20/2014 - 4:59pm
SleakerJust to re-iterate: People getting harassed is wrong. Just because someone is harassed by so called 'gamers' doesn't mean that all gamers are bad. nor does it mean that you need to pass laws or judgement on all gamers.09/20/2014 - 4:56pm
SleakerAnd furthermore just because someone doesn't 'crusade against the evil' that doesn't make them the problem. You can have discussion with those around you. There's a thing called sphere of influence.09/20/2014 - 4:54pm
Sleaker@Conster - one person getting harassed is a 'problem' only so far as the harassee's are doing it. Just because a select few people choose to act like this doesn't make it widespread. Nor does it immediately make everyone responsible to put an end to it.09/20/2014 - 4:54pm
james_fudgeno worries09/20/2014 - 4:15pm
TechnogeekI misread james' comment as "we can't have a debate without threatening" there at first. Actually wound up posting a shout about death threats and "kill yourself" not technically being the same thing before I realized.09/20/2014 - 3:59pm
james_fudgeDon't hit me *cowers behind Andrew*09/20/2014 - 3:20pm
ConsterYou take that back right now, james, or else. *shakes fist menacingly*09/20/2014 - 3:00pm
james_fudgeOur community is awesome. We can have a debate without threatening to kill each other.09/20/2014 - 2:50pm
Andrew EisenNo one's crossed a line but I just want to remind you all to keep discussions civil.09/20/2014 - 1:54pm
Craig R.tldr: I'm a gamer, and imo those who support GamerGate should feel free to take a flying leap off a cliff.09/20/2014 - 1:27pm
Craig R.Not only that, I'm pretty sure that if actual studies were done, you'd still deny them, Sleaker. After all, it's not what you'd want to hear to support your rose-colored view of GamerGate.09/20/2014 - 1:18pm
Craig R.There IS an issue. Nor do we need a study to show that if you deny it then you're part of the problem.09/20/2014 - 1:17pm
Sleakersimply oust people that do harass others.09/20/2014 - 11:34am
Sleaker@Conster - I can say the same thing if you think there's been more than a handful. Until there's an actual study on rates no one can claim to know how widespread the incidence of harassment is. Thus the best we can do is 'there might be an issue' and...09/20/2014 - 11:33am
ConsterSleaker: if you think there's only been "a handful of" incidents, you have your head stuck *somewhere* - I'm assuming it's sand.09/20/2014 - 5:38am
prh99Most of it's agitprop clickbait anyway.09/20/2014 - 5:27am
prh99A good reason to stop reading reguardless of view pointhttp://www.theguardian.com/media/2013/apr/12/news-is-bad-rolf-dobelli.09/20/2014 - 5:22am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician