Chinese Parents Sell Children for Internet Games

July 26, 2011 -

According to Southern Chinese news agency Sanxiang City News a couple sold off their three children to fund their obsession with playing online games at Internet Cafes. The couple met in 2007 and quickly bonded because of their hobby. A year later their gaming was already getting in the way of being parents. In that year the couple had their first child - a son. Days later they left the young child home alone while they went to play online games at an Internet cafe 30 km away.

A year later the bad parenting escalated to unimaginable levels. In 2009 the 21-year-old couple had a baby girl. It was at that point they came up the idea to sell her for $500 USD. When that worked for them the couple sold their first child for $4,600 USD. Finally the couple has a third child, which they sold for another $4600 USD. Keep in mind that the couple did all this to fund their Internet cafe activities.

Inevitably it was a family member who finally figured out what was going on and reported the couple - Li Lin and Li Juan - to authorities.

When asked if they missed the children they had sold, the parents said: "We don’t want to raise them, we just want to sell them for some money” and claimed that they did not know what they were doing was wrong.

Source: ABCNewsRadio


Comments

Re: Chinese Parents Sell Children for Internet Games

I don't know why but this cases are always reported in some Asian countries, like be it China, Korea or Taiwan.

Re: Chinese Parents Sell Children for Internet Games

Capitalism at its peak.

Re: Chinese Parents Sell Children for Internet Games

And this country is beating America.

Re: Chinese Parents Sell Children for Internet Games

Are the kids still alive? Who did they sell them too?

Re: Chinese Parents Sell Children for Internet Games

"and claimed that they did not know what they were doing was wrong." Games. A symptom, not a cause.

Re: Chinese Parents Sell Children for Internet Games

Hey, free market at work there. They found a product they could product that people are willing to pay for, good for them.

Re: Chinese Parents Sell Children for Internet Games

Well, this is what happens when you roll back regulations and government intrusion into parent's rights.   This is the past many people want to return the US to.....

Re: Chinese Parents Sell Children for Internet Games

Actually, this is what happens when you have an authoritarian government that regulates everything so badly some are actually better off buying kids. That's certainly not a situation that would just happen on its own without some kind of outside force making it so.

Re: Chinese Parents Sell Children for Internet Games

Actually, this is what happens when you have an authoritarian government that regulates everything so badly some are actually better off buying kids. That's certainly not a situation that would just happen on its own without some kind of outside force making it so.

Re: Chinese Parents Sell Children for Internet Games

Uh, what? Dude, I think we can all agree that outright selling of human beings should be outlawed. You don't need to drag government intrusion into the home into this mess. It's fucked up enough as it is.

Re: Chinese Parents Sell Children for Internet Games

China really does make everything now.

-Austin from Oregon

Feel free to check out my blog.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
james_fudgewelcome to 2014 politics. Increasingly fought online10/20/2014 - 1:54pm
E. Zachary KnightIt is honestly a shame that anyone has to publicly state they are against such vile behavior, but that is the sad life we live.10/20/2014 - 1:46pm
E. Zachary KnightDecided to publicly reiterate my opposition to harassment campaigns. http://randomtower.com/2014/10/just-stop-with-the-harassment-and-bullying-campaigns-already/10/20/2014 - 1:45pm
Andrew EisenMichael Chandra - Unless I overlooked it, we haven't seen how the directive to not talk about whatever he wasn't supposed to talk about was phrased so it’s hard to say if it could have been misconstrued as a suggestion or not.10/20/2014 - 12:35pm
Andrew EisenHey, the second to last link is the relevant one! He actually did say "let them suffer." Although, he didn't say it to the other person he was bickering with.10/20/2014 - 12:29pm
Neo_DrKefkahttps://archive.today/F14zZ https://archive.today/SxFas https://archive.today/1upoI https://archive.today/0hu7i https://archive.today/NsPUC https://archive.today/fLTQv https://archive.today/Wpz8S10/20/2014 - 11:21am
Andrew EisenNeo_DrKefka - "Attacking"? Interesting choice of words. Also interesting that you quoted something that wasn't actually said. Leaving out a relevant link, are you?10/20/2014 - 11:04am
quiknkoldugh. I want to know why the hell Mozerella Sticks are 4 dollars at my works cafeteria...are they cooked in Truffle Oil?10/20/2014 - 10:41am
Neo_DrKefkaAnti-Gamergate supporter Robert Caruso attacks female GamerGate supporter by also attacking another cause she support which is the situation happening in Syia “LET SYRIANS SUFFER” https://archive.today/F14zZ https://archive.today/Wpz8S10/20/2014 - 10:18am
Neo_DrKefkaThat is correct in an At-Will state you or the employer can part ways at any time. However Florida also has laws on the books about "Wrongful combinations against workers" http://www.flsenate.gov/Laws/Statutes/2012/448.04510/20/2014 - 10:07am
james_fudgehe'd die if he couldn't talk about Wii U :)10/20/2014 - 9:16am
Michael ChandraBy the way, I am not saying Andrew should stop talking about Wii-U. I find it quite nice. :)10/20/2014 - 8:53am
Michael Chandra'How dare he ignore my wishes and my advice! I am his boss! I could have ordered him but I should be able to say it's advice rather than ordering him directly!'10/20/2014 - 8:52am
Michael ChandraIf GP goes "EZK, do not talk about X publicly for a week, we're preparing a big article on it" and he still tweets about X, they'd have a legitimate reason to be pissed.10/20/2014 - 8:52am
Michael ChandraIf GP tells Andrew "we'd kinda prefer it if you stopped talking about Wii-U for 1 week" and he'd tweet about it anyway, firing him for it would be idiotic.10/20/2014 - 8:51am
Michael ChandraLegal right, sure. But that doesn't make it any less pathetic of an excuse.10/20/2014 - 8:50am
ZippyDSMleeYou mean right to fire states.10/20/2014 - 8:50am
james_fudgesome states have "at will" employee laws10/20/2014 - 7:50am
quiknkoldIt says in the article that being in florida, you can get fired regardless if its a fireable offence10/20/2014 - 7:19am
Michael ChandraIf your employee respectfully disagrees with your advice, that's not a fireable offense. If they ignore your order, THEN you have the right to be pissed.10/20/2014 - 6:49am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician