Ubisoft Relents on Driver: San Francisco DRM

August 18, 2011 -

Ubisoft, faced with a groundswell of opposition to the copy protection in the PC version of Driver: San Francisco, has announced that the game will not require a constant connection to a server in order to play. Players will no longer be required to have a constant internet connection in order to play the game, but they will still need to sign in online at the game’s launch.

"We’ve heard your feedback regarding the permanent internet connection requirement for Driver and have made the decision to no longer include it," said a statement from Ubisoft on the matter. "So this means that Driver PC gamers will only need to sign in at game launch but can subsequently choose to play the game offline."

Hopefully this will be a lesson learned by Ubisoft about "always on" DRM schemes. Consumers do not like them and don't want them in their PC games. Driver San Francisco for Windows will be released September 30. The game will hit Xbox 360, PS3 and Wii on September 2.

Source: Develop

Posted in

Comments

Re: Ubisoft Relents on Driver: San Francisco DRM

As much as it might hurt to miss the next Assassin's Creed, well, I dunno if console sales count or not.

Re: Ubisoft Relents on Driver: San Francisco DRM

Pretty much agree with the rest of you. I will continue to ignore Ubi until they realize that they can have all the soapbox arguments they want regarding the securing of their product but in the end you just can't force your customers to buy it if they dont like the restrictive DRM wrapper around it.

Its really that simple Ubi... The customer is KING.

Re: Ubisoft Relents on Driver: San Francisco DRM

This isn't relenting. You still need a constant internet connection to play. This is Ubisoft listening to gamers but totally not hearing them. Having to sign in everytime you launch the game is the same thing as requiring constant internet connection. The only difference is you don't get booted if your wireless goes down in the middle of gaming.

Ubisoft is pushing this hard and I think gamers are pushing back. I have not purchased and will not purchase an Ubisoft title as long as they have anything strong than a one time activation. They recently got caught out lying about their From Dust DRM on Steam as well, they said it only required a one time activation but you have to be logged into UPlay to play, meaning always on internet DRM.

I just can't wait for this company to go under. They are just the worst.

 

EDIT: I checked and their games are still getting cracked anyway. So what are you accomplishing Ubisoft? Tell me what you are accomplishing.

Re: Ubisoft Relents on Driver: San Francisco DRM

This is not Ubi not listening to gamers. This is Ubi listening to gamers and doing the opposite. This (with the From Dust fiasco) is Ubi flat out lying to gamers.

This is my reason never to buy an Ubi Soft game ever again. They went too far this time.

Re: Ubisoft Relents on Driver: San Francisco DRM

Not good enough. They're giving only the most token of concessions while not grasping that if you're somewhere that you can't connect to the internet, you can't play this game. If you can't contact their servers because they're down, and this will happen at some point, you can't play your game.

Pirates, in the meantime, will be able to play the game with no problems at all. And I know this game is going to get pirated despite this bullshit DRM because I have actually paid attention for the past five years.

Re: Ubisoft Relents on Driver: San Francisco DRM

On top of that, they said originally that From Dust would require a one-time internet activation, but as it turns out you have to be online to launch the game at all. Even if you're using the Steam copy, running Steam in offline mode, Ubisoft's DRM requires an internet connection.

Edit: Oh yeah, and they deleted their own forum post where they made that promise and replaced it with a new one, without any trace of apology.

http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2011/08/18/ubisoft-edits-forum-keeps-fro...


---
I'm not under the affluence of incohol as some thinkle peep I am. I'm not half as thunk as you might drink. I fool so feelish I don't know who is me, and the drunker I stand here, the longer I get.

Re: Ubisoft Relents on Driver: San Francisco DRM

Yup.

----
Papa Midnight

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Did Microsoft pay too much ($2.5 billion) for Minecraft developer Mojang?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenOoo, this one came down to the wire! https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/749082525/nefarious09/19/2014 - 1:03am
Andrew EisenI don't doubt that many are truly interested in journalistic integrity. The problem I'm often seeing is they seem to have no idea how or where to talk about it.09/18/2014 - 11:46pm
Andrew EisenDidn't word that well. Busy at work. I've seen people claim that GamerGate is solely about ethics and transparency in games journalism and then go on to show that what they're really after is silencing those who talk about gender issues in games.09/18/2014 - 11:45pm
Kronodebate. Becaus apparently people who only post on Reddit are supposed to police twitter before they're allowed to question anything about the people involved.09/18/2014 - 10:40pm
KronoI highly doubt many, if any are using journalistic integrity as a cover for harassment. The people harassing are essentially trolls. They aren't interested in subtle. More often it's othe other way around. People use "but X is being harassed" to shut down09/18/2014 - 10:38pm
Andrew EisenAnd exacerbating everything is the fact that all the cries of ethics violations have been obnoxious and easily proven false.09/18/2014 - 8:59pm
Andrew EisenProblem is, I would imagine, the sheer number of people who are using journalistic integrity as a cover for their harassing actions or only bringing it up on the false pretense of journalistic integrity.09/18/2014 - 8:47pm
Andrew EisenHaving said that, I can certainly see how one would be frustrated if they truly just wanted to talk about journalistic integrity and someone said they were one of the people harassing Sarkeesian, Quinn and others (though I've seen no examples of that).09/18/2014 - 8:44pm
KronoThat's been the common refrain, that talk of journalism ethics is just an excuse to harass people.09/18/2014 - 8:44pm
KronoLines like "like a partial compromise with the howling trolls who’ve latched onto ‘ethics’ as the latest flag in their onslaught against evolution and inclusion." are taring everyone questioning the ethics as a harasser.09/18/2014 - 8:43pm
Andrew EisenKrono - Except, none of the articles were talking about gamers complaining about journalist ethics, let alone called them white male misogynists. They were talking about the gamers who were harassing others.09/18/2014 - 8:36pm
Kronomakes plenty of sense. It's rather hard to dismiss someone as a white guy running a sock puppet when they've posted proof they're a woman, or black, or another minority.09/18/2014 - 8:32pm
Kronothat any critics of journalists were white guys that hated women, and could be dismissed as such. It seems to have helped some. It's kind of difficult to maintain the white guy narrative in the face of a bunch of women and non-white guys. So the tag09/18/2014 - 8:32pm
Kronothat, someone vented on a #gamergate 4chan thread about being dismissed like that. The suggestion they got in return was to organize their own hashtag in response, with #NotYourShield being suggested. Thus the tag came into use to combat the undercurrent09/18/2014 - 8:32pm
Kronomuch more general problem. And while several of the articles were fairly tame, they spured a bunch of people to dismiss any critics of the journalism involved as misogynistic men. Usually with insults aimed at the geek stereotype. After about a week of09/18/2014 - 8:32pm
Andrew EisenSleaker - Not sure what that has to do with anything but yeah, the gender percentages differ depending on how the study defines what a gamer is.09/18/2014 - 8:32pm
KronoThe rhetoric pushed by the spearheading articles that the "gamers" complaining about journalist ethics were just angry white male misogynists, insulted a lot of people that were previously fairly neutral. It made it go from a Kotaku problem, to a09/18/2014 - 8:31pm
Krono@Andrew I'm not surprised overlap exists. I expect much of it is a rush to jump on the bandwagon, either by reporting on the original articles, or rushing out their own. The point is that was a major flashpoint, much bigger than the reddit mass deletion.09/18/2014 - 8:31pm
Sleaker@AE - well the gamer trend was described with stats on Factual Femenist. Only 1 in 7 males plays games 20+ hrs going into college vs 1 in 40 females. So gaming is definitely still male dominated despite fake stats trying to say otherwise.09/18/2014 - 8:30pm
Craig R.Do conspiracies ever make sense? The fact that people are now having to defend themselves against nutjob websites like Breitbart.com shows how far down into the rabbit hole we've all been forcibly dragged.09/18/2014 - 7:05pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician