Konami to UK Retailers: Stop the Price War

September 1, 2011 -

Konami Europe's top executive says that publishers are taking a shellacking from retailers in the United Kingdom because of their competitive pricing and constant sales battles and he's had enough. Speaking to MCV, the publisher’s European chief Kunio Neo said that the UK market is suffering, while other territories such as Germany are thriving. He blames the constant sales battles among retailers in the UK and he has a message for them: Stop the price wars.

“UK games pricing is very poor,” said Neo. “Retailers are always reducing prices and the profits for publishers are getting smaller. The UK is really suffering. And he said that Konami is far from the worst-off publisher in this situation.

“We’re based in Germany and despite the economic conditions in many other countries, Germany is doing alright. So we’re not as affected as a US publisher that has a UK office. They’re suffering because they focus their sales on the UK.”

Konami’s European GM of sales, marketing and products, Martin Schneider offered a more succinct message:

"Tell the UK shops to stop the price war."

We wonder if they are actually listening, and we have a pretty good idea of what consumers in the UK think about all the sales..

Source: Konami


Comments

Re: Konami to UK Retailers: Stop the Price War

Hmm, lets investigate a few games that pop up on web pages of the console section of the leading UK high street games retailer... in fact, the ONLY major high street retailer specialising in video games as far as I'm aware.

 

GAME - FIFA12 or MW3, £45.  Dead Island or BF3, £40.

RRP - FIFA12 or MW3, £55.  Dead Island or BF3, £50.

US prices - $59.99, equivalent to £36.99 at current exchange rates.

Maybe the UK retailers are undercutting recommended retail prices, but we're still getting gouged in comparison, so what I'm thinking is, "you dont know what the hell you're drooling about, Konami, you insane morons."

Re: Konami to UK Retailers: Stop the Price War

So he wants to UK to stop selling games at cheaper prices. I take it that he believes that £55 for COD is acceptable then?

Games at £30 are still too expensive, and considering that the UK has to pay more for hardware and software, well he just needs to take a long hard look at those comments.

Re: Konami to UK Retailers: Stop the Price War

£30 can be a substantial amount of money compared to ones budget but £30 for a product that, in some cases, gives you hundreds of hours of entertainment is practically a steal.

Re: Konami to UK Retailers: Stop the Price War

Lol. You know you are full of yourself when you make this statement publicly.

On the other hand, UK, could you teach other countries how to be more competitive?

Re: Konami to UK Retailers: Stop the Price War

Would Mr. Neo prefer price fixing, instead?

Re: Konami to UK Retailers: Stop the Price War

wait a second...wouldn't retail sales come out of the store's cut of the sale? unless Konami's lowering what they sell it to the stores for, how could that have an effect on them?

Re: Konami to UK Retailers: Stop the Price War

So Konami is basically saying "Screw the free market! Sell stuff at the price we want them sold for, not what their market says they should be sold for."

Re: Konami to UK Retailers: Stop the Price War

I wouldn't go that far, but if something doesn't happen soon, there won't be much of a market left.  If something's not profitable, there's no investment. What most people fail to realize is that games are not a labor of love. It's a business. If there's no money to be made, investors take their money elsewhere. If there's no investment, there's no product.

It's the same thing with reserving games at Gamestop or Target. If there's no pre-orders, that tells the publishers there's no interest, so they cut their losses and move on to the next project. One of the big reasons that games are canceled is lack of consumer interest.

Re: Konami to UK Retailers: Stop the Price War

The question is what exactly is supposed to "happen soon"?

Now we don't know what kind of supplier contracts are in place here, but Konami should theoretically be able to refuse to sell their product to retailers below a certain point, setting a price floor for any retailers that want to carry the merchandise and be able to sell it at a profit. However, the effectiveness of that depends on how much the retailers value Konami products versus how much they value the increased business from all of their sales. If the Konami products aren't "must have" big sellers, then they may have their answer why they're having a hard time holding a higher price point.

My question is, where is the problem here that is inhibiting normal correction if prices are truly too low from a market standpoint, rather than just "too low" from what the publishers would like? If the UK market really is doing so bad, the retailers ultimately are going to hit the bottom on slashing prices and still being able to sustain themselves, and the weaker competitors are going to start dropping. One would assume the reduced competition at that point would see prices start to rise again.

It is entirely possible I'm missing something, but I'm not sure where any of this is deviating from normal market dynamics to the point that the whole UK games market could implode.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Which group is more ethically challenged?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Matthew Wilson@info depends on the sector. for example, have you looked at how powerful unions are in the public sector? I will make the argument they have too much power in that sector.07/07/2015 - 12:39pm
InfophileIt's easy to worry about unions having too much power and causing harm. The odd thing is, why do people seem to worry about that more than the fact that business-owners can have too much power and do harm, particularly at a time when unions have no power?07/07/2015 - 12:31pm
Matthew Wilsonthe thing is unions earned their bad reputation in the US. the way unions oparate the better at your job you are, the likely you want to be in a union.07/07/2015 - 11:33am
InfophilePut that way, "right to work" seems to have BLEEP-all to do with gay rights. Thing is, union-negotiated contracts used to be one of the key ways to prevent employers from firing at will. Without union protection, nothing stops at-will firing.07/07/2015 - 11:06am
Infophilehas an incentive to pay dues if they're represented either way, so the union is starved for funds and dies, unless things are bad enough that people will pay dues anyway.07/07/2015 - 11:02am
InfophileFor those who don't know, "right to work" laws mean that it can't be a condition of an employment contract that you pay union dues. That is, the right to work without having to pay dues. Catch is, unions have to represent non-members as well, so no one...07/07/2015 - 11:01am
MechaCrashUnexpected? Seriously?07/07/2015 - 10:55am
Mattsworknamejob they wanted without the unions getting involved. The problem is, it has some unexpected side effects, like the ones Info mentioned07/07/2015 - 8:49am
MattsworknameThe problem being, right to work states exsist specificly as a counter to Unions, as the last 20 or so years have shown, the unions have been doing this countries economoy NO favors. The right to work states came into being to allow people to work any07/07/2015 - 8:49am
Infophile(cont'd) discriminatory. This can only be done for protected classes which are outlined in law (race, sex, religion, ethnicity everywhere, sexual orientation in some states). So, a gay person could be fired because they're gay and have no recourse there.07/07/2015 - 7:27am
Infophile@Goth: See here: http://www.snopes.com/politics/sexuality/firedforbeinggay.asp for a good discussion on it. Basically, the problem is that in the US, most states allow at will firing, and it's the burden of the fired person to prove the firing was ...07/07/2015 - 7:25am
Goth_SkunkAssuming that's true, then that is a fight worth fighting for.07/07/2015 - 6:58am
Yuuri@ Goth_Skunk, in many states being gay is not a protected status akin to say race or religion. It's also in the "Right to work" states. Those are the states where one can be fired for any reason (provided it isn't a "protected" one.)07/07/2015 - 6:07am
Goth_Skunkregarded as a beacon of liberty and freedom that is the envy of the world, would not have across-the-board Human Rights laws that don't at the very least equal those of my own country.07/07/2015 - 5:47am
Goth_SkunkI find that hard to believe, Infophile. I have difficulty believing employers can *still* fire people for being gay. I would need to see some evidence that this is fact, because as a Canadian, I can't believe that the United States,07/07/2015 - 5:46am
InfophileFor that matter, even women don't yet have full legal equality with men. The US government still places limits on the positions women can serve in the military. And that's just the legal side of things - the "culture wars" are more than just laws.07/07/2015 - 5:43am
InfophileAnd that's just LGB issues. Get ready for an incoming battle on rights for trans* people. And then after that, a battle for poly people.07/07/2015 - 5:41am
InfophileA battle's been won. In many states employers can still fire people for being gay. And in many states, parents can force their children into reparative therapy to try to "fix" being gay. Those battles still need to be fought.07/07/2015 - 5:40am
Goth_Skunkand now they've switched to battles that don't need to be fought.07/07/2015 - 5:37am
Goth_SkunkIn my opinion, it was the final legal hurdle denying homosexual couples final and recognized statuses as eligible spouses. But even though this war's been won, some people are still too keen to keep fighting battles,07/07/2015 - 5:28am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician