Report: French Gamers Spend Less, Play for Free

September 6, 2011 -

Two new research reports from Newzoo - the 2011 French National Gamers Survey (L’Etude Nationale des Jeux Video) and the international Games Market Revenue Report - reveal that 24 million French citizens spend a total of 27 million hours per day playing games. Interestingly, less than half (42 percent) of those gamers ever spend money on games. According to Newzoo, total consumer spending is expected to reach €3.2bn in 2011, down 10 percent from 2010. Almost three quarters (73 percent) buy PC, Mac or console games, including second-hand trade, digital downloads and import.

Spending on new boxed games has dropped to 41 percent of all money spent, totaling to €1.3bn, comparable to what IDEF en SELL recently projected for France in 2011. Spending on downloadable PC or Mac games is expected to grow 22 percent compared to last year. Spending on console DLC is expected to surpass €120 million or 8 percent of all console spending. Online and mobile gaming takes 51 percent of all time spent playing games, and 26 percent of spending on social network games (+11 percent) and mobile devices including iOS devices (+9 percent).

"France is a relatively conservative market as console and PC/Mac gaming still take the majority of money," notes Newzoo CEO and co-founder Peter Warman. "At the same time, second-hand trade and import form a larger share in France compared to Germany or the UK. Also, playing games online for free is immensely popular in France. In 2011 we foresee the micropayment business models of mobile, online and MMO games converting more and more players to payers, a trend that has been underway longer in the US and other main EU territories."

An infograph showing the numbers in perspective can be found at Newzoo, while more information on those surveyed as part of the study can be found here.


 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenI don't know who you think the two groups are but I've never seen anyone claim that one group has a monopoly on people who misbehave (unless you're grouping the people who misbehave, of course).05/04/2015 - 8:14pm
MattsworknameI dont disagree on the jerks sentiment Andrew, so long as all agree that both side had there fair share of jerks got inolved with this whole clusterfark.05/04/2015 - 8:10pm
Andrew EisenI speak from experience. I'm not a jerk face and I've never had a problem discussing things with a huge variety of people.05/04/2015 - 7:59pm
Andrew EisenGreat, so long as they're not jerk faces, they should have no problem.05/04/2015 - 7:58pm
Goth_SkunkOr if they have the unfortunate distinction of following certain undesirables on Twitter. i.e. Milo Yiannopolous, Roguestar, Mundane Matt, C.H. Sommers, Mark Kern, Adam Baldwin et al.05/04/2015 - 7:53pm
Andrew EisenThere's no need for anyone who's not a jerk face to admit to vile actions they didn't commit.05/04/2015 - 7:52pm
Goth_SkunkI disagree. I believe all the parties wanting discussion are on the GG side. The parties against GamerGate aren't interested in discussion, as evidenced by the propensity to simply block people on social media the moment they identify as pro-GG.05/04/2015 - 7:51pm
Andrew EisenShe used to allow comments on her videos. Blame the jerk faces that that's no longer the case.05/04/2015 - 7:49pm
Andrew EisenSarkeesian has given plenty of talks in venues where anyone is welcome to attend. It's not her fault that most of her audience supports her. That said, she HAS fielded questions from detractors.05/04/2015 - 7:49pm
Mattsworknameboth sides to start taking things off the table that are not relevant to the actuall issues they hold, so we can find out where these 2 groups really stand, not what a biased media labeled them ass05/04/2015 - 7:48pm
Mattsworknamechallenge her or disagree. Second ,I want both sides to admit to the vile actions there more fringe and extreme supports commited and admit it was wrong on both sides. I want both sides to argue what there core issues are and why they hold them, and i wan05/04/2015 - 7:47pm
MattsworknameTo clarify andrew, in all that ive seen, anita only talks or gives qas to audiance that share her views, never any opposing viewpoints. She does not allow any commensts on her videos and only ever did interviews with those who support her, not those who05/04/2015 - 7:42pm
Andrew EisenIf so, I'd have to agree with most that those are viewpoints that are simply not worth entertaining.05/04/2015 - 7:23pm
Andrew EisenAre you really looking for a discussion where one side is advocating hate, bullied self censorship and no discussions of women in video games?05/04/2015 - 7:22pm
Andrew EisenAnd for your three things you'd like to see discussed, Sarkeesain wants the hate to stop, doesn't want to bully the industry into self censorship and already talks about women in video games.05/04/2015 - 7:22pm
Andrew EisenDon't know about Yiannopoulos. I don't follow his work because I find it roundly terrible.05/04/2015 - 7:19pm
Andrew EisenGG and anti-GG aren't groups. You can't organize people like that. It doesn't work that way. Sarkeesian participates in discussions complete with Q/A all the damn time. It's why her videos take so damn long.05/04/2015 - 7:18pm
MattsworknameMaybe among themselves andrew, but I cant find any indicatoin that the gg or anti gg groups ever tried to honestly debate each other, name one time anita debated someone or milo debaated someone from the other side, I cant find any05/04/2015 - 7:15pm
Andrew EisenNot at all true. It's just the jerk faces that aren't willing to be decent, civil human beings. Everyone else is fine and more than willing to talk about stuff.05/04/2015 - 7:04pm
MattsworknameTrue andrew, but to my best effort research, i can find no indication of either side being willing to do that. As far as i can tell, neither side is willing to discusss or debate the other. They just keep attacking each other.05/04/2015 - 6:59pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician