A Mother's 'Long-Overdue Reaction' to Brown v. EMA

September 15, 2011 -

I'm all for letters to the editor, but one written by one Tina L. Bechtel, is particularly over the top and needs to be read to be believed. The Marysville, California mother of at least one son (at least the one she mentions in her letter) delivers what she calls her "long-overdue reaction to the 'supreme sellout' of our children," referring to the Supreme Court's decision earlier this year in the Brown v. EMA case. We'll let you read her short letter and judge for yourselves, but clearly Tina and others like her get information from questionable media outlets... Read on:

"I would like to submit my long-overdue reaction to the "supreme sellout" of our children with the Supreme Court's June 27 decision on the sales of violent video games to minors. The excuses and reasons given to justify this decision are completely ridiculous and make no sense at all.

Restricting access to these violent, sexually explicit games is violating minors' rights to free speech? Does this now mean my son or daughter can go to school and tell the teacher "Good f---ing -orning, you bleep bleep."

According to the Supreme Court, freedom of expression must be preserved at all cost. Then we have the "it's art" excuse. I honestly think the only time you will hear that carjacking, murder, rape, and many other deviant actions rewarded with more points and higher levels categorized as art is when the "art" is bringing in $18 billion a year. Personally, I think they had better take another vote to mandate that at least $15 billion of their profits go toward our future prison system.

With the mixed-up messages our government is sending our children, our future leaders and decision makers, we as parents, educators and mentors are their only hope. Shame on all of involved in the sellout of our children's future and the absolute blatant disregard of how the decision will affect our future society, and the people who will have to live in it, long after they are gone, for today's industrial greed.

Tina L. Bechtel

Marysville, California
"

To paraphrase Tina, I hope everyone has a "Good f---ing -day, you bleep bleeps."

Source: Appeal Democrat


Comments

Re: A Mother's 'Long-Overdue Reaction' to Brown v. EMA

Sigh! I know it's no use, but here's some things this mother should know.

Point 1: Minors do have First Amendment rights against the government. The government can't restrict Free Speech material to them solely because people find it unsuitable or offensive for them.

This leads to the second point that the laws claim they're trying to do: Prevent some kind of harm.

Point 2: Violent Media Research is extremely weak, inconsistent, as well as incredibly flawed and biased. When you find the same effect from playing Grand Theft Auto as that from watching Bugs Bunny, or reading a violent passage of the Bible, you are restricting speech on the basis that it's offensive or unsuitable, not because it supposedly harmful.

Point 3: This is the most important one. Nothing in this ruling stops a parent from preventing their children from playing a video game they don't want them to. It's your house, it's your rules, the state is not a surrogate nanny for you, and it shouldn't be. If we were to ban speech on the basis that parents don't want their children to have it, then we would also have to ban the Bible and Harry Potter novels.

"No law means no law" - Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black on the First Amendment

Re: A Mother's 'Long-Overdue Reaction' to Brown v. EMA

I totally agree and would help to strengthen your argument, but she's not going to read it here.

That poor poor woman. I don't blame her. I blame whoever lied to her. She needs help. She needs to turn her head from those "questionable media outlets," and listen to the truth. I wish I could help her.

Re: A Mother's 'Long-Overdue Reaction' to Brown v. EMA

Tina Bechtel, what you have just said, is one of the most insanely idiotic things I’ve ever read. At no point during your rambling, incoherent response, were you even close to anything that could have been considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber having read it. I and every other intelligent person in the world award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul, you blistering idiot.

Geaux Saints, Geaux Tigers, Geaux Pelicans. Solidarity for the Saints = No retreat, no surrender. 2013 = Saints' revenge on the NFL. Even through the darkest days, this fire burns always.

Re: A Mother's 'Long-Overdue Reaction' to Brown v. EMA

Hmm, I think I can translate.

"I do not think I should ever have to make hard decisions and expect the government to do it for me and everyone else."

 

Seriously, she is just demanding the government do for her what she can already do.

Re: A Mother's 'Long-Overdue Reaction' to Brown v. EMA

Actually, I think her big push was that other parents should not be allowed to make decisions either and that the games are destroying society as a whole.

Re: A Mother's 'Long-Overdue Reaction' to Brown v. EMA

So, the rock and roll argument.

Re: A Mother's 'Long-Overdue Reaction' to Brown v. EMA

And people wonder why I hate this state.

Re: A Mother's 'Long-Overdue Reaction' to Brown v. EMA

Were do they keep finding these idiots? Games deplicting rape? What games? Rapelay? That's the only one I can think of and we all know that was released to every retailer in this country. What's that you say? That game was only released in Japan and the only way to get it in this country is to import it at ridiculously high prices or download it illegally. We won't let those facts stand in the way of a good lie. Not when we can dig up that dead horse and beat it some more. Ah the good old points arguement yet none of the games featuring such deviant behavior that I can find have points. Sure you have to do certain tasks to advance but you still have to watch violent parts of movies to advance their plot as well. I can't believe people still use the sales to minors not being regulated excuse. They are to extremes in some cases. Not to mention the fact that every console has parental controls, games have ratings. All these tools are given to them and then they bitch and moan because they're not using what's been given to them. It's like driving a nail with your forehead when the hammer is inches from your hand. What else can be done short of slapping stupid parents who don't control what their kids play in the head for being dumbasses.

Re: A Mother's 'Long-Overdue Reaction' to Brown v. EMA

Won't someone PLEASE think of the children?!

Since when does free speech mean one has a license to say anything they want in any situation?  Of course it's not socially acceptable to tell someone "Good f---ing -orning."  That doesn't mean it's illegal.

Of course, that's not the issue in the first place.  The real issue is that California had no business legislating good parenting.  It's the responsibility of the adult in the household to prevent the kids from playing games that are inappropriate for their age (preaching to the choir in this forum).

Just my two f---ing cents you bleep bleeps.

Have a good -orning.

Re: A Mother's 'Long-Overdue Reaction' to Brown v. EMA

Actually yes her son can go to class and say that without fear of being arrested or persecuted for it. I think that is a pretty damned good thing too. Since the constitution doesn't remove Tina's ability (or the school's) to instill proper discipline in her children this argument is very weak.

Re: A Mother's 'Long-Overdue Reaction' to Brown v. EMA

Not quite.   Many constitutional protections are suspended for minors when it comes to school (including the school's ability to extend that power outside its boarders).  While I doubt a child could be arrested for those particular words, children have been arrested for things like violent poetry.

Re: A Mother's 'Long-Overdue Reaction' to Brown v. EMA

VIDEOGAMES EXIST AND I AS A PARENT HAVE NO CONTROL OVER WHAT THEY PLAY!!!

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

How do you feel about Amazon buying Twitch?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
ConsterWait, what's this about Leland Yee eliminating witnesses?08/30/2014 - 5:50pm
IanCBroke my EA boycott to pick up Plants vs Zombies Garden Warfare. Loving it. Still hate EA though. But i like Popcap. Gah.08/30/2014 - 6:01am
MaskedPixelantehttp://m.tickld.com/x/something-you-never-realized-about-guardians-of-the-galaxy Right in the feels.08/29/2014 - 6:56pm
AvalongodAgain I think we're conflating the issue of whether Sarkeesian's claims are beyond critique (no they're not) and whether its ever appropriate to use sexist language, let alone physical threats on a woman to intimidate her (no it isn't)08/29/2014 - 5:04pm
prh99Trolling her or trying to assail her integrity just draws more attention (Streisand effect?). Which is really not what the trolls want, so the only way to win (if there is a win to be had) is not to play/troll.08/29/2014 - 5:02pm
prh99Who cares, just don't watch the damn videos if you don't like her. Personally, I don't care as far as she is concerned as long there are interesting games to be played.08/29/2014 - 4:34pm
Andrew EisenZip - And yet, you can't cite a single, solitary example. (And no one said you hated anyone. Along those lines, no one claimed Sarkeesian was perfect either.)08/29/2014 - 3:51pm
Andrew EisenSaint's Row: Gat Out of Hell was just announced for PC, PS3, PS4, Xbox 360 and Xbox One making it the 150th game For Everything But Wii U! Congratulations Deep Silver!08/29/2014 - 3:49pm
ZippyDSMleeI do not hate them jsut think its mostly hyperlobe.08/29/2014 - 3:40pm
Andrew EisenSleaker - I'd say that's likely. From my experience, most who have a problem with Sarkeesian's videos either want to hate them in the first place (for whatever reason) or honestly misunderstand what they're about and what they're saying.08/29/2014 - 3:16pm
james_fudgeWe appreciate your support :)08/29/2014 - 2:55pm
TechnogeekIt gives me hope that maybe, just maybe, the gaming community is not statistically indistinguishable from consisting entirely of people that your average Xbox Live caricature would look at and go "maybe you should tone it down a little bit".08/29/2014 - 2:49pm
TechnogeekI just want to say that while I've disagreed with the staff of this site on several occasions, it's still good to see that they're not automatically dismissing Anita's videos as a "misandrist scam" or whatever the preferred dismissive term is these days.08/29/2014 - 2:49pm
E. Zachary KnightZippy, So you can't find even one?08/29/2014 - 1:04pm
ZippyDSMleeAndrew Eisen:Right because shes prefect and never exaggerates... *rolls eyes*08/29/2014 - 12:53pm
SleakerAnd honestly, nearly all of the games she references, or images she depicts I've always cringed at and wondered why they were included in games to begin with, from pinups through explicit sexual depictions or direct abuse. I think it's cheap storytelling.08/29/2014 - 12:35pm
Sleaker@AE - aren't most people fundamentally misunderstanding her at this point? haha.. On a related note I think a lot of the backlash is coming from males that think she is telling them their 'Generic Male Fantasy' is bad and wrong.08/29/2014 - 12:33pm
Andrew EisenAnd no, I don't think the female community would be upset over the performance of a case study in and of itself. Possibly the mostivations behind such a study, the methodology or conclusions but not the mere idea of a case study.08/29/2014 - 12:29pm
Andrew EisenAmusingly, these videos aren't saying you can't/shouldn't use tropes or that sexual representations are inherently problematic so those are very silly things to have a problem with and indicate a fundamental misunderstanding of the series.08/29/2014 - 12:29pm
SleakerDo you think the female community would get extremely angry over a male doing a case study on the negative impact of sex-novels and their unrealistic depiction of males and how widespread they are in american culture?08/29/2014 - 12:25pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician