Porn Stars Want to Pwn You

September 17, 2011 -

Even with the distraction of a foulmouthed twelve-year-old cursing in your ear, you’ve still got game.  But how well would you hold up against streaming video of a topless porn star?

Adult performers Alana Evans and Misti Dawn have launched PwnedByGirls, a new website that will allow eager gamers to play video games with them or just kick back and watch them mop the floor with competitors who just can’t seem to focus.

Celebrating the launch of Gears of War 3, the first streamed gaming session (which will be recorded and archived for subsequent, uh, review) will kick off on September 20th.

"I am a huge Gears of War fan,” said Evans.  “It's my favorite game to play on Xbox Live, so when I came up with this idea and presented it to Misti, I knew the release date of Gears would be the perfect start date.  Misti is probably the most dedicated gamer girl I know, so she was the obvious choice as my partner for PwnedByGirls.com.”

Dawn added, "I'm very excited to share with our fans the new project we have started. Are you a gamer? Are you sick of pretend gamer girls? Yeah us too. Time to pwn some n00000bs with our b00bs."

Thank goodness the Kinect offers hands-free gaming!  Am I right?

Source: XBIZ via IGN

[Disclosure: I freelance for IGN]

-Reporting from San Diego, GamePolitics Contributing Editor Andrew Eisen


Comments

Re: Porn Stars Want to Pwn You

I certainly would like more girls playing video games in what has been mostly a boys only club. I  don't mean to be preachy but i can't help but feel that this will alienate women even further. This just further sexualizes the female form in an industry that is already saturated with women in skimpy outfits with huge jugs.

 I can't  help but feel that this is an attempt to manipulate, and further cement, the stereotypical gamer, you know the one that is obese, lives in his mothers basement, never touched a breast with their hands.

Now of course these girls might be legit gamers and just happen to enjoy showing off what god has graced them with and decided to combine the two. Sure perhaps there might be a market for this kind of thing. Almost certain there is sadly.

Re: Porn Stars Want to Pwn You

I'm just wondering, do these girls do co-op 4play?

“How can one not be fond of something that the Daily Mail despises?” ― Stephen Fry

Re: Porn Stars Want to Pwn You

I wonder if it becomes a legal gray area when they're playing nude and recording, and a 10-year-old's voice comes through the speakers.

yeah...that sounds bad.

Re: Porn Stars Want to Pwn You

I'm pretty sure there's a screening process, just like any other adult website. If a kid lies about his age to see topless women playing video games, the women can't be held legally responsible for that.

Re: Porn Stars Want to Pwn You

*blink*

Well, I guess if years ago people would pay to watch Jenny brush her teeth... people today might pay to watch girls play video games.  I don't get it, but then again I don't get strip clubs either.

Re: Porn Stars Want to Pwn You

Haha, Gears of War?

Get on TF2 and I'll show you a real good time. Good time as in it's good for me and bad for you since I will be coming from the back, if you catch my drift.

*Ehem*

Gentlemen.

Re: Porn Stars Want to Pwn You

It's amusing how people can be so nonchalant about it, when on the inside we all know they're interested.

Re: Porn Stars Want to Pwn You

Is this site payed for by sponsors? I just can't believe that anyone would pay to watch women play topless when there is so much free porn on the internet. Free! It also makes me want to stick to my beloved single player games. On-line gaming is not very girl friendly and I get enough flack for that in real life, thank you very much.

Re: Porn Stars Want to Pwn You

"Are you sick of pretend gamer girls?"

What do they mean by this? Actual, clothed, girls playing online? :s

 

Re: Porn Stars Want to Pwn You

I suppose that it really does show that the pornography industry is aiming towards the teenage market, and that it is far from an adult-aimed industry as it once was.

I suppose the typical demographic of GOW3 is that of verbally abusive immature teenage boys who would follow a session of GOW with a session of pornography.

Re: Porn Stars Want to Pwn You

The age of the average gamer is now 37. Games being "just for kids" is a myth.

Re: Porn Stars Want to Pwn You

Because the only people who play games are teenage boys..?

 

 

 

Re: Porn Stars Want to Pwn You

No, but I imagine that only people who want to see naked women fiddling about with some joysticks playing games that feature people being penetrated by vibrating weapons would be teenage boys.

Re: Porn Stars Want to Pwn You

Thats not fair.

 

What (straight) male is going to be able to concentrate.

The universe is hostile, so impersonal Devour to survive... so it is, so it's always been

Re: Porn Stars Want to Pwn You

The ones already graced by the sight of fantastic artillery and/or the feel of soft valleys.

Takes more than a pretty lady to distract me.

Re: Porn Stars Want to Pwn You

Posing with the Nintendo zapper from Duck Hunt? That's hardcore gameography.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Sora-ChanI realize that they have ways getting around it, but one reason might be due to earthquakes.04/17/2014 - 4:42am
Matthew WilsonSF is a tech/ economic/ trade center it should be mostly tail building. this whole problem is because of the lack of tail buildings. How would having tail apartment buildings destroy SF? having tail buildings has not runed other cities around the US/world04/16/2014 - 10:51pm
Matthew WilsonAgain the issue is you can not build upwards anywhere in SF at the moment, and no you would not. You would bring prices to where they should have been before the market distortion. those prices are not economic or socially healthy.04/16/2014 - 10:46pm
ZippyDSMleeYou still wind up pushing people out of the non high rise aeras but tis least damage you can do all things considered.04/16/2014 - 10:26pm
ZippyDSMleeANd by mindlessly building upward you make it like every place else hurting property prices,ect,ect. You'll have to slowly segment the region into aeras where you will never build upward then alow some aeras to build upward.04/16/2014 - 10:25pm
Matthew WilsonSF have to build upwards they have natural growth limits. they can not grow outwards. ps growing outwards is terable just look at Orlando or Austin for that.04/16/2014 - 4:15pm
ZippyDSMleeIf they built upward then it would becoem like every other place making it worthless, if they don't build upward they will price people out making it worthless, what they need to do is a mix of things not just one exstreme or another.04/16/2014 - 4:00pm
Matthew Wilsonyou know the problem in SF was not the free market going wrong right? it was government distortion. by not allowing tall buildings to be build they limited supply. that is not free market.04/16/2014 - 3:48pm
ZippyDSMleeOh gaaa the free market is a lie as its currently leading them to no one living there becuse they can not afford it makign it worthless.04/16/2014 - 3:24pm
Matthew WilsonIf you have not read http://arstechnica.com/gaming/2014/04/introducing-steam-gauge-ars-reveals-steams-most-popular-games/ you should. It is a bit stats heavy, but worth the read.04/16/2014 - 2:04pm
Matthew Wilsonthe issue is when is doesn't work it can screw over millions in new york city's case. more often than not it is better to let the free market run its course without market distortion.04/16/2014 - 9:36am
NeenekoTrue, and overdone stagnation is a problem. It is a tricky balance. It does not help that when it does work, no one notices. Most people here have benifited from rent controls and not even realized it.04/16/2014 - 9:23am
ZippyDSMleehttp://www.afterdawn.com/news/article.cfm/2014/04/15/riaa_files_civil_suit_against_megaupload04/16/2014 - 8:48am
ZippyDSMleeEither way you get stagnation as people can not afford the prices they set.04/16/2014 - 8:47am
Neenekowell, specifically it helps people already living there and hurts people who want to live there instead. As for 'way more hurt', majorities generally need less legal protection. yes it hurt more people then it helped, it was written for a minority04/16/2014 - 8:30am
MaskedPixelantehttp://torrentfreak.com/square-enix-drm-boosts-profits-and-its-here-to-stay-140415/ Square proves how incredibly out of touch they are by saying that DRM is the way of the future, and is here to stay.04/16/2014 - 8:29am
james_fudgeUnwinnable Weekly Telethon playing Metal Gear http://www.twitch.tv/rainydayletsplay04/16/2014 - 8:06am
ConsterTo be fair, there's so little left of the middle class that those numbers are skewing.04/16/2014 - 7:42am
Matthew Wilsonyes it help a sub section of the poor, but hurt both the middle and upper class. in the end way more people were hurt than helped. also, it hurt most poor people as well.04/16/2014 - 12:13am
SeanBJust goes to show what I have said for years. Your ability to have sex does not qualify you for parenthood.04/15/2014 - 9:21pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician