Italy Proposes One Strike Infringement Law

September 26, 2011 -

A new law being introduced by Italian politicians wants to crack down on citizens who are even accused of copyright infringement. The draft of the law would require ISPs to "blacklist" any citizens suspected of copyright, patent or trademark infringement. If ISPs are not compliant with the law, they could be held liable under civil law. Everybody gets a spanking equally under the law apparently.

While the U.S. has proposed a six strikes plan for copyright enforcement by internet service providers (ISPs), Italy has taken its plan even further by drafting an anti-piracy law that would require ISPs to use filters against infringements that fall under the terms of the law. Users wouldn't get a chance to blink if they were accused of infringement because all it takes is one incident to lose Internet.

Earlier this year, the UN's Human Rights Council released a report that said internet access is a human right. It went on to say that the disconnection of internet users is something that should be repealed. The law would add revisions Italy's e-commerce directive. It was drafted by members of the parliament belonging to the ll Popolo della Libertà (PdL) party of Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi in July.

Naturally both ISPs and citizens are very concerned about the law and it is unclear if there is any kind of appeals process written into the law.

Paolo Brini, a spokesperson for ScambioEtico, a movement committed to copyright reform, confirmed this one strike internet law, and said that Italian citizens could be disconnected from the internet entirely if the ISP filter picks up an alleged copyright, patent or trademark infringement.

"Some parts of the draft law are clearly not applicable in real life, while others have the power to crumble ISPs and hosting e-commerce," said Brini. "It is very interesting to note that this draft law is compliant to one of the older versions of ACTA, the Anti Counterfeiting Trade Agreement.

"I firmly think that this is a 'green light' toward one-strike disconnections for any kind of infringement, not only disconnections for industrial property rights infringements."

The law would also require no judicial steps in order to punish an infringer.

Marietje Schaake, member of the European Parliament, has asked the EU Commission if Italy can legally enact such a bill.

"Via the press, it has come to my attention that the Italian Parliament is currently considering a draft law by which internet users can be disconnected and blacklisted if they have been accused on an intellectual property infringement. The accusation does not necessarily need to originate from the rights holder of the work in question."

Schaake also noted that the new draft law violates many EU laws. Hopefully it goes nowhere and dies quietly in a filing cabinet in the bowels of an Italian government building.

Source: DailyTech


Comments

Re: Italy Proposes One Strike Infringement Law

I can't believe Italian politicians are going to punish someone accused of copyright infringement. They had the Mafia, they can't punish anybody anymore. I'm no New Orleans injury lawyer, but someone should tell them it's illegal for them to take such decisions.

Re: Italy Proposes One Strike Infringement Law

No problem. Get yourself a couple of poor man copyrights, make them on broad subjects touching most of the copyright owners in Italy and challenge their ISP with a copyright infringement. Then, if it goes to court, drop the case. Repeat (or have someone else do so to avoid becoming "hot"). This law should be overturned in weeks (if passed.)

-edit-

Wow, did not even read that bit: "The accusation does not necessarily need to originate from the rights holder of the work in question."

Aka, dig a bit and anything that seem similar, challenge them. You don't even have to defend it.

Re: Italy Proposes One Strike Infringement Law

if what i read here is correct, you dont even need to go that far, all you have to do is accuse them and they get blacklisted.  no checking of facts, no appeals (supposedly), no judicial process, just an accusation.  I'll bet the mafIAAs are toasting to this one.

Re: Italy Proposes One Strike Infringement Law

I really, really want this to pass.

I want to see the fallout when Anonymous or somebody else DoSes the Italian government. Then maybe people in government positions will get the idea of how bad these laws are.

 

 

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MattsworknameAndrew and EZK help me pull back a bit , still working on it05/22/2015 - 7:06am
ConsterI think IP is the only person here who doesn't think IP needs to dial it back several levels.05/22/2015 - 6:14am
Mattsworknamehttp://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/05/22/fec-backs-off-flirtation-with-regulating-internet/05/22/2015 - 1:34am
MattsworknameWell, on another subject, Saw this, and while I know it's fox news, thuoght I should share it05/22/2015 - 1:34am
MechaCrashYeah, even I think IP needs to dial it back.05/22/2015 - 12:35am
Mattsworknamesays05/21/2015 - 11:17pm
MattsworknameRE doc, everyone has a tendancy to let emotion get ahead of them, especially in an annoymous forum like the web. We have have those moments. Ip however has nothing but those moments. it's why I stopped responding to him, regardless of what he thinks or05/21/2015 - 11:17pm
DocMelonheadNo offense, but I see your behaviors in the comment sections uncalled for.05/21/2015 - 8:51pm
DocMelonheadHell, I could use both Goth_Skunk and IronPatriot as an example of such behavior between the two.05/21/2015 - 8:43pm
Andrew EisenMock? Ridicule? No, we're talking about serious threats and abuse, not people being cheeky or mean. Big difference.05/21/2015 - 8:42pm
DocMelonheadIn fact I see both mocks and ridicule between both the GamerGate Supporters and GamerGate Critics.05/21/2015 - 8:41pm
DocMelonheadAs for the Harassment, well, this is the internet; people will mock and ridicule whoever they want, whenever they want, at all times.05/21/2015 - 8:40pm
Mattsworknamegoth I think all media news outlets have that disclaimer05/21/2015 - 8:39pm
Andrew EisenThat's an... interesting way to interpret that.05/21/2015 - 8:36pm
Goth_SkunkAnd re BBC vs Rockstar: Ahh. I missed that. Woops!05/21/2015 - 8:33pm
Goth_SkunkAE: The entire disclaimer is a valid reason why I don't take it seriously. Particularly the part where they say "the information contained herein may not be necessarily accurate or current." Because fact-checking, like math, is haaaaaaaaard!05/21/2015 - 8:32pm
MattsworknameI take all media reporting with huge skepticism. the Mary sue Included. that said, there not as bad Jezebel.05/21/2015 - 8:27pm
DocMelonheadYou could say that the Mary Sue only interested in Gender issues in pop culture, and they only see GamerGate as a Hate group that fight for the oppressive status quo.05/21/2015 - 8:22pm
MechaCrashWell, can't blame him for not expanding on it and missing stories here. Sealioning people demanding proof of claims and then calling them liars when they provide it is busy work!05/21/2015 - 8:20pm
Andrew EisenRe: Mary Sue - Uh, why exactly? Re: Rockstar - Yep, we reported that earlier today.05/21/2015 - 8:12pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician