Square Enix: Final Fantasy XIV Damaged the Final Fantasy Brand

September 27, 2011 -

At a press conference in Tokyo, Japan yesterday, Square Enix CEO Yoichi Wada said that the entire Final Fantasy brand has been damaged by its latest MMO title. Final Fantasy XIV, which launched in September of 2010 on PC, did not do as well as anticipated due mostly to serious technical issues, connectivity issues, and bugs at launch. This caused the PS3 version of the MMO to be delayed as the development team put its focus on fixing problems and generally improving the game to make customers happy.

"The Final Fantasy brand has been greatly damaged," said Wada. "We'll continue with our reform work, which basically amounts to fully redoing the game, and hope to revive the FFXIV that should have been released."

Last year Producer Naoki Yoshida laid out a list of gameplay changes to be rolled out into the summer. In the early days of the launch Square Enix was forced to let customers play for free while it worked out all of the game's kinks. Obviously this has had an impact on the company financial standing in its most recent quarter. Luckily it has a number of Western franchises to fall back on, like Deus Ex: Human Revolution..

Source: Gamasutra


Comments

Re: Square Enix: Final Fantasy XIV Damaged the Final Fantasy ...

Wait, so the fact that there's over 10 games, most of which add nothing new to the genre or series as a whole and only seek to reinforce repetitive gameplay wasn't the reason the game has been damaged?

Well that's a relief! Good thing they're rebooting the entire series again, amirite‚Äč?

Re: Square Enix: Final Fantasy XIV Damaged the Final Fantasy ...

Square Enix damaged to Final Fantasy brand, it could even be argued that the Crystal Chronicles games (While decent) further diluted the name.

Re: Square Enix: Final Fantasy XIV Damaged the Final Fantasy ...

To be fair, the original was great, if you had other people to play it with. Crystal Bearers wasn't bad, either.

Re: Square Enix: Final Fantasy XIV Damaged the Final Fantasy ...

Exactly, it's a great series that should of been allowed to stand on it's own as Crystal Chronicles or considered the  proper evolution of the Mana franchise which itself is related Final Fantasy.

Re: Square Enix: Final Fantasy XIV Damaged the Final Fantasy ...

So you're saying it shouldn't have had "Final Fantasy" in the title? I fail to see how a mere title can influence the quality of gameplay.

Therein lies another huge problem with our gaming society, we place too much weight on a mere title of a franchise, least of all Final Fantasy, which apparently carries a large expectation of the game to be nearly identical to the "blockbuster" games before it. But instead, we get bitching like "It's not enough like FF7", or "This has nothing to do with any of the other Final Fantasy games!"

I say, play each game, and judge it on its own merit. Take FFXIII for example. I loved the game, I enjoyed the story, and it has one of the greatest combat systems I've ever seen. Can't wait for the sequel.

It's like I'm constantly telling people who want more games like Final Fantasy 7: If you want Final Fantasy 7, then PLAY Final Fantasy 7. Just because a game isn't what you expected doesn't necessarily mean it's a bad game.

Re: Square Enix: Final Fantasy XIV Damaged the Final Fantasy ...

And 13 was the jewel in its crown, right?

Almost forgot my sarcasm disclaimer there. Having played FF13-2 at the Eurogamer Expo on Saturday, I can safely say the only thing damaging the FF brand right now is Square Enix.

Re: Square Enix: Final Fantasy XIV Damaged the Final Fantasy ...

The series ended for me at 9.  10 wasn't great, but it was good.  Though in retrospect comparing it to everything that came after it was pretty great.  But again that is only in comparison.

Re: Square Enix: Final Fantasy XIV Damaged the Final Fantasy ...

I Disagree.  The audience for FFXIV is too small a subset (MMO players who also care about JRPGs and want them together) of the gaming audience for it to be the prime culprit in the damage to the FF name.  Square has been mishandling the franchise for far longer than FFXIV was around.

The disappointment surrounding FFXIII and the sheer overmilking of the Final Fantasy namesake with endless spinoffs and rereleases are what damaged the brand.  There was once a time when a new Final Fantasy game was a big event.  Now, these games come so frequently and with so much more "fluff" that the franchise has been effectively devalued.  

Final Fantasy could be argued to be analogous to Call of Duty: fair or not, it represents what is wrong with Japanese games in the way CoD represents all that is wrong with Western games.

...of course, when (not "if") the FF7 remake comes out, any negativity toward the brand will be irrelevant when it makes tons of money.

Re: Square Enix: Final Fantasy XIV Damaged the Final Fantasy ...

I agree on pretty much everything except the FF7 remake. I know I'm in the minority here, but I seriously hope it doesn't ever see the light of day. There's WAY better Final Fantasy games that could use a remake. 6 comes to mind. Re-releasing FF7 with all the bugs and translation errors fixed is one thing, but I, for one, do NOT want to see a high-definition Drag Cloud.

Again, I may be in the minority here, but I didn't have a problem with FF13. I genuinely enjoyed it.

 

 

Re: Square Enix: Final Fantasy XIV Damaged the Final Fantasy ...

How would you feel about a remake of 10...seriously, that's what they're doing right now: http://www.siliconera.com/2011/09/13/final-fantasy-x-is-being-remade-for...

Re: Square Enix: Final Fantasy XIV Damaged the Final Fantasy ...

Actually, looking at the comments, that is a mistake.

https://member.eu.square-enix.com/en/blogs/introducing-final-fantasy-x-p...

Square is remastering FFX (Giving it the HD treatment), not remaking it.

Re: Square Enix: Final Fantasy XIV Damaged the Final Fantasy ...

The mistake is not realizing that re-mastering FF10 for HD is a complete waste of time.

I'll never play 10 again. I enjoyed 9 a lot more than 10, and I won't play 9 again either. Never got into 8.

I could go for a remake/remaster of 6 or 7 though.

Re: Square Enix: Final Fantasy XIV Damaged the Final Fantasy ...

Best not to remaster 6 and 7. The graphics there are so low that it would not look very good if you beefed up the resolution. But a remake would be welcome; probably a remake for the PSP (though i lack a psp)

Re: Square Enix: Final Fantasy XIV Damaged the Final Fantasy ...

Definitely best to remaster 6. Out of all the Final Fantasy games, I think 6 deserves it. It had the best storyline, the best gameplay, and of course, the best villain ever. Don't tell me you wouldn't want to see Sabin's Blitzes or Cyan's SwordTechs in HD. Also, Esper Terra. :3

Re: Square Enix: Final Fantasy XIV Damaged the Final Fantasy ...

Damned you ninja'd me on FF13.


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

http://zippydsm.deviantart.com/

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Did Microsoft pay too much ($2.5 billion) for Minecraft developer Mojang?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Craig R.Do conspiracies ever make sense? The fact that people are now having to defend themselves against nutjob websites like Breitbart.com shows how far down into the rabbit hole we've all been forcibly dragged.09/18/2014 - 7:05pm
Michael ChandraBut when the mountain obviously exists...09/18/2014 - 5:49pm
Michael ChandraMind you, if someone makes a mountain out of a molehill with a secret agenda as motive, it'd be fine.09/18/2014 - 5:48pm
Andrew EisenOkay, so I guess I'm not making sense of #notyourshield because it doesn't make any sense.09/18/2014 - 5:28pm
Andrew EisenI'd really only count three as being "death of gamer" articles and only one as arguably going a bit far with "gamers are young white dudes" stuff.09/18/2014 - 5:17pm
Andrew EisenMost are really just a look at the crap that happened the previous day when Sarkeesian's new video came out and almost all are exceedingly clear that they're talking about the specific gamers who are being obnoxious.09/18/2014 - 5:17pm
Andrew EisenKrono - Yep, I had only seen two. I looked at the 12 you sent and while I had seen a few of them, I didn't think to count them. Some aren't about gamers at all. One's just highlighting two others. One is a Gamasutra community member blog post.09/18/2014 - 5:15pm
Michael Chandrawould clearly not apply, since they weren't used as shield. It's more "hey, just because I don't agree with you doesn't mean I'm CISWASP."09/18/2014 - 5:08pm
Michael ChandraIn comparison though, the more extreme views would be fairly countered with "you don't speak for me". But the batshit crazy people tend not to even use others as the shield to defend their batshit crazy ideas and insults, so at that point #notyourshield09/18/2014 - 5:06pm
Michael ChandraWhich is of course real silly because when there are so many horrible stories and statistics too, it's utterly irrelevant whether some don't mind.09/18/2014 - 5:00pm
Michael ChandraIn this context it would be women claiming they don't see a problem with the stuff, so stop claiming women don't like it!09/18/2014 - 5:00pm
Michael Chandra"You don't speak for me. I am not your shield. You cannot use me to defend your own opinion."09/18/2014 - 4:59pm
Michael ChandraAE, if we leave aside the falsehoods some use with the term, the idea is regarding minorities and such.09/18/2014 - 4:58pm
Michael ChandraKrono did just a bit earlier in the shoutbox prh99.09/18/2014 - 4:56pm
Andrew EisenI still don't get the what #notyourshield is supposed to mean. Who is unfairly using who as a shield for what?09/18/2014 - 4:43pm
prh99Didn't said anything about #notyourshield or it's origins. Assuming your comment was directed at me.09/18/2014 - 4:28pm
prh99Leigh Alexander is right though, no one has to cater to them (trolls). I think a lot of them would likely continue playing even if scantily clad women were omitted or protagonist was female.09/18/2014 - 4:21pm
Michael ChandraSo no, normal gamers feeling attacked was not what sparked #notyourshield and only a fool would suggest otherwise.09/18/2014 - 4:21pm
Michael Chandra#NotYourShield was kickstarted by 4chan people, so don't go and make nonsense claims about that.09/18/2014 - 4:20pm
prh99those toxic individuals conduct their trolling under. It could have easily been under the Men Rights banner etc, they are just generally unpleasant and angry people who can't stand people disagreeing with them. 09/18/2014 - 4:00pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician