PSN Pass Code Required for Uncharted 3 Multiplayer

October 3, 2011 -

Sony will be rolling out its PSN Pass for the multiplayer aspects of its upcoming game Uncharted 3. As it did earlier this year with Resistance 3, Sony will implement a "PSN Pass" code on Uncharted 3. This means that when you buy a copy of the game brand new at retail it will come with a special code specifically for multiplayer that you will have to activate the first time you play online. Should you sell the game the next person that buys it will have to turn around and pay $10 to get access to multiplayer.

Online pass schemes are proving to be popular among publishers such as Electronic Arts, THQ and others, as a way to squeeze money from used games sales. Sadly these Online Pass systems only squeeze the money out of consumers- many of whom bought the game used because they either wanted to save some money or couldn't afford a brand new copy of the game...

The confirmation on the Uncharted 3 Online Pass comes from Juan Jimenez, Software Manager of Sony Spain. He confirmed the new in this interview.

Source: Kotaku


Comments

Re: PSN Pass Code Required for Uncharted 3 Multiplayer

Et tu, Sony?

This has gotten out of hand. Developers need to stop punishing the consumers simply because they want to make money on the same game twice.

Re: PSN Pass Code Required for Uncharted 3 Multiplayer

correction, publishers.

the publishers are the ones that get to make these decisions not the developers. More oft that not the developers are on a tight leash that forbids them from saying what they truly feel about this sort of thing, and end up given bad credit because they were told to say only good things.

Re: PSN Pass Code Required for Uncharted 3 Multiplayer

Right, my bad. Wrong term. I need to stop posting on sleep deprivation. -.-

Re: PSN Pass Code Required for Uncharted 3 Multiplayer

I chose not to buy Homefront because of this stuff, so they lost me. I have to agree with Jim Sterling on this subject.

-----------------------------------------

Managing Editor at TheBestGameSiteEver.com

Re: PSN Pass Code Required for Uncharted 3 Multiplayer

"Sadly these Online Pass systems only squeeze the money out of consumers- many of whom bought the game used because they either wanted to save some money or couldn't afford a brand new copy of the game..."

Wow, this is quite the agenda laden statement from GP. I wholeheartedly disagree, and you can still play the game single player used, so you pay less, and get less game. This seems like a pretty fair way for the company to generate revenue from used game sales, and doesn't infringe on consumer rights. It's too bad you cant sell your passcode to the new owner once it's been used, but seriously, the game does not become worthless without multiplayer.

Any way we can keep the snarky asides to JT articles?

-Austin from Oregon

Feel free to check out my blog.

Re: PSN Pass Code Required for Uncharted 3 Multiplayer

"so you pay less, and get less game"

Man, wouldn't the RIAA have loved this?

You sell a CD used, the next buyer randomly can't play one of the tracks simply because a record company decided it should be that way.

Whether you buy new or used, you rightfully have the expectation of buying a *complete* game. Not one where some functionality may be disabled because you bought it used.

And, yes, this is 2011: multiplayer is expected, not an exception.

Re: PSN Pass Code Required for Uncharted 3 Multiplayer

It's too bad you cant sell your passcode to the new owner once it's been used,

It used to be that way. But rather than having to transfer some activation code, it was just built into the games.

There are other ways to make money off of buyers of used games that do not require stripping out content that used to come with it. Traditional DLC is one way.

I still think these online codes are a bad idea and I don't believe for a second that they are making any serious money off of them.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenHere's the thing: it's absolutely, totally okay to not have interest in gender issues as they relate to games. Totally, totally fine. So, don't read those articles. If the very presence of those articles just butters the wrong side of your bread...05/06/2015 - 6:37pm
Wonderkarpok works for me.05/06/2015 - 6:34pm
Andrew EisenThe same as the one in the dictionary.05/06/2015 - 6:28pm
WonderkarpAndrew, I'm curious as to what your definition of being a Feminist is05/06/2015 - 6:28pm
Andrew EisenWhich would seem to be an incredibly small number of inconsequential numb nuts on Twitter.05/06/2015 - 6:20pm
MattsworknameNot really singling it out, its just whats on my mind at the moment. Also, its one thing to want to improve womens rights and stuff, its another to be a manhating rabid extremist, which is what alot of "So called" femisnists seem to be.05/06/2015 - 6:15pm
Andrew Eisenegregious.05/06/2015 - 6:12pm
Andrew EisenNow, that said, it ain't just the group you're talking about that goes "bonkers" about stuff. Gamers in general do that about everything. Such behavior is not unique to social critique so I've no idea why it's being singled out as being particularly...05/06/2015 - 6:12pm
Andrew EisenIf you're not a feminist, you're a pretty awful person. If you don't identify as a feminist, you likely don't understand what it means.05/06/2015 - 6:10pm
Mattsworknamewhich naturally brings out the other sides worst elements, and then the shit fest starts all over again. I mean ,can't we go a single day without this kinda crap. is it so hard for people to just enjoy stuff anymore?05/06/2015 - 6:09pm
MattsworknameAndrew, its more a general sense of frustration then a specific issue, the comments didn't help, but it's like can't have anything come out now adays that doesn't have some group of feminists going bonkers over it,05/06/2015 - 6:09pm
Andrew EisenYou would classify that editorial as excellent, eh? Yikes.05/06/2015 - 5:57pm
Andrew EisenAnd what's gone?05/06/2015 - 5:52pm
Goth_SkunkThe editorial also touches on how the "half of gamers are women" statistic can be misleading.05/06/2015 - 5:47pm
Goth_Skunk"Playable Female Characters Are Not Important" -- http://ow.ly/MCz1P05/06/2015 - 5:46pm
Goth_SkunkPowerGamer has written an excellent editorial explaining how unimportant the gender of a protagonist is in AAA games. The title of the editorial is blatant clickbait, though.05/06/2015 - 5:45pm
Goth_SkunkAaaand it's gone.05/06/2015 - 5:42pm
Andrew EisenI'm biased but I'm awarding my mother Best Damn Comment On the Internet This Week. https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=1650523975177205&id=10000658855862305/06/2015 - 5:23pm
Andrew EisenAh, that's right. Based Gamer's crowd funding campaign snuck in right under the wire. Still, nothing going on at the site but these things take time. We'll see what happens.05/06/2015 - 5:07pm
Wonderkarpgoodgamer.us is the one that died05/06/2015 - 4:58pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician