PSN Pass Code Required for Uncharted 3 Multiplayer

October 3, 2011 -

Sony will be rolling out its PSN Pass for the multiplayer aspects of its upcoming game Uncharted 3. As it did earlier this year with Resistance 3, Sony will implement a "PSN Pass" code on Uncharted 3. This means that when you buy a copy of the game brand new at retail it will come with a special code specifically for multiplayer that you will have to activate the first time you play online. Should you sell the game the next person that buys it will have to turn around and pay $10 to get access to multiplayer.

Online pass schemes are proving to be popular among publishers such as Electronic Arts, THQ and others, as a way to squeeze money from used games sales. Sadly these Online Pass systems only squeeze the money out of consumers- many of whom bought the game used because they either wanted to save some money or couldn't afford a brand new copy of the game...

The confirmation on the Uncharted 3 Online Pass comes from Juan Jimenez, Software Manager of Sony Spain. He confirmed the new in this interview.

Source: Kotaku


Comments

Re: PSN Pass Code Required for Uncharted 3 Multiplayer

Et tu, Sony?

This has gotten out of hand. Developers need to stop punishing the consumers simply because they want to make money on the same game twice.

Re: PSN Pass Code Required for Uncharted 3 Multiplayer

correction, publishers.

the publishers are the ones that get to make these decisions not the developers. More oft that not the developers are on a tight leash that forbids them from saying what they truly feel about this sort of thing, and end up given bad credit because they were told to say only good things.

Re: PSN Pass Code Required for Uncharted 3 Multiplayer

Right, my bad. Wrong term. I need to stop posting on sleep deprivation. -.-

Re: PSN Pass Code Required for Uncharted 3 Multiplayer

I chose not to buy Homefront because of this stuff, so they lost me. I have to agree with Jim Sterling on this subject.

-----------------------------------------

Managing Editor at TheBestGameSiteEver.com

Re: PSN Pass Code Required for Uncharted 3 Multiplayer

"Sadly these Online Pass systems only squeeze the money out of consumers- many of whom bought the game used because they either wanted to save some money or couldn't afford a brand new copy of the game..."

Wow, this is quite the agenda laden statement from GP. I wholeheartedly disagree, and you can still play the game single player used, so you pay less, and get less game. This seems like a pretty fair way for the company to generate revenue from used game sales, and doesn't infringe on consumer rights. It's too bad you cant sell your passcode to the new owner once it's been used, but seriously, the game does not become worthless without multiplayer.

Any way we can keep the snarky asides to JT articles?

-Austin from Oregon

Feel free to check out my blog.

Re: PSN Pass Code Required for Uncharted 3 Multiplayer

"so you pay less, and get less game"

Man, wouldn't the RIAA have loved this?

You sell a CD used, the next buyer randomly can't play one of the tracks simply because a record company decided it should be that way.

Whether you buy new or used, you rightfully have the expectation of buying a *complete* game. Not one where some functionality may be disabled because you bought it used.

And, yes, this is 2011: multiplayer is expected, not an exception.

Re: PSN Pass Code Required for Uncharted 3 Multiplayer

It's too bad you cant sell your passcode to the new owner once it's been used,

It used to be that way. But rather than having to transfer some activation code, it was just built into the games.

There are other ways to make money off of buyers of used games that do not require stripping out content that used to come with it. Traditional DLC is one way.

I still think these online codes are a bad idea and I don't believe for a second that they are making any serious money off of them.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Matthew Wilsonits called windows 10, and I am happy to get the start menu back.09/30/2014 - 7:18pm
Jessy HartIs this stuff about Windows 10 legit? Is it actually called Windows 10 or is it just some stupid joke?09/30/2014 - 6:57pm
ZippyDSMleeSo I been trying to play Bioshock Infinite I got all the DLC,ect but do not want the extras to make your charatcer over powered from the start.....they force you to take them which is quite annoying......09/30/2014 - 6:45pm
Craig R.I need to upgrade to an SSD, still seriously debating moving to Win8.1 from 7 at the same time09/30/2014 - 6:07pm
Craig R.Win10 is probably Win8.1 with more cleanup and the Start button back.09/30/2014 - 6:06pm
Sora-ChanAhh, it's just weird seeing someone's post all of a sudden have replies from days prior before it was posted due to that.09/30/2014 - 5:49pm
MechaTama31sora: I broke the ordering intentionally, as AE's and my conversation had squeezed the text boxes down to be quite slim. I replied to an earlier post of his instead of the one I was actually replying to.09/30/2014 - 5:46pm
MechaTama31So, 9 would have been the good one, but they are skipping it to do two crap ones in a row?09/30/2014 - 5:41pm
Sora-ChanSo, judging from the poll post for #gamergate, it looks like too many thread replies breaks the ordering of posts, as seen with the recent post from Infophile.09/30/2014 - 5:31pm
Andrew EisenOr no! It wasn't Y3K compliant. Microsoft thought it best to super future proof its OS and skipped straight to 10 which is Y3K compliant!09/30/2014 - 5:01pm
Andrew EisenJust tell them it wasn't Y2K compliant.09/30/2014 - 5:00pm
Craig R.Looking forward to having to explain to coworkers down the road what ever happened to 9 *sigh*09/30/2014 - 4:57pm
Craig R.2k was crap. XP was solid, 7 is good, 8.1 is actually really good once you make it look like 7 :)09/30/2014 - 4:52pm
Sora-Chan@MP As someone who has used each version of windows since 3.1... I prefer Vista over 7 for various reasons. The only thing I give 7 over Vista is preformance. They really screwed up a bunch of things when making 7. Also, XP was a pain. 2k was better.09/30/2014 - 4:13pm
Jessy Hart@E. Zachary Knight Is that show called Pac-Man and the Ghostly Adventures?09/30/2014 - 3:34pm
IanCWin 8 isn't bad, it just can't decide whether to be a desktop OS or a tablet OS.09/30/2014 - 2:40pm
IanCI think its a way of getting round giving it free to Win 8 users...09/30/2014 - 2:39pm
MaskedPixelanteWindows alternates between bad and good versions. XP was good, Vista sucked, 7 was good, 8 sucked, therefore 10 will suck, QED.09/30/2014 - 2:18pm
E. Zachary KnightPerhaps they are calling it "10" because on a scale of 1-10 of how awesome it is, it is a clear 10.09/30/2014 - 2:06pm
E. Zachary KnightTo be fair. Microsoft has had a bit of a numbering issue lately. What with going from XBox 360 to XBox One.09/30/2014 - 2:06pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician