Catwoman in Arkham City Requires VIP Pass Code Redemption

October 13, 2011 -

Warner Bros. has confirmed to Eurogamer that the Batman: Arkham City VIP pass (a code that comes in the retail box) unlocks the playable Catwoman content. While Warner Bros. says that "playing as Catwoman is not required to complete the game," to access her in the campaign missions you'll need to use the code. When Warner Bros. first started talking about Catwoman as a playable character, they noted that her part in the game's story was around 10 percent. Apparently you can play the game without her and her omission will not affect getting the Platinum Trophy on the PS3.

Without the VIP pass code, Catwoman still appears in the game as part of the storyline, but her playable missions remain locked, as do any achievements or trophies associated with her.

On Xbox 360 the Batman VIP pass costs 800 Microsoft Points and on the PlayStation 3 it costs £7.99, or around $10 USD.

Eurogamer uncovered this news from a video title screen. It read: "Catwoman is a unique character with her own story, moves, and weapons. Unlock Catwoman by redeeming the 1st purchaser included in the game case or by visiting Xbox Live Marketplace."

Source: Eurogamer


Comments

Re: Catwoman in Arkham City Requires VIP Pass Code Redemption

This is not the way to encourage people to buy new copies. These companies think entirely about themselves and completely ignore their customers. Why else would they do such an anti-consumer thing? This doesn't benefit the customers in anyway, it only serves their desires.

Here's what they should do:

The biggest sales come in the first 6 weeks (I read that somewhere, I forget where) after release. So, after the early adopter sales, drop the price by half and keep it there for 6 more weeks and do the same thing again for another 6 weeks. This way, it's harder for used games to be profitable for the likes of Gamestop (their profits shrink when you drop the price on used games they just bought, making the used game market less valuable) and people who buy used, will be willing to buy new, snagging sales that you would never had gotten at the original release price. It's the perfect solution. You drop the prices aggressively so the used market can't keep up and people don't need to buy used to save money. They can do this because their marginal costs are tiny after the fixed costs are recouped. It will actually make them more in profits because they'd increase the volume of sales.

So, a $60 game becomes $30 after 6 weeks and it becomes $15 after 12 weeks. Imagine how many people would snap up the game at $15. So what about people who will just wait for the game to drop in price that would have bought at $60? Well, I'd offer them something they must have when it's out for $60, something they just have to get with the game and will pay $60 to get it. I don't know what that thing is, market studies and focus groups would have to figure that out, maybe some experiments with different incentives (that's incentives, not take away what should have been included in the first place) that make the game more valuable (maybe giving away limited free copies of older games that are no longer selling?).

-Greevar

"Paste superficially profound, but utterly meaningless quotation here."

Re: Catwoman in Arkham City Requires VIP Pass Code Redemption

This really makes me mad.  OK, fine, I've got the game preordered and this won't be an issue for me anyway, but it doesn't change the fact that this Day 1 DLC stuff is completely out of hand.

Re: Catwoman in Arkham City Requires VIP Pass Code Redemption

Purchasers of a new copy are rewarded for supporting the developers?

Sounds fair to me

Re: Catwoman in Arkham City Requires VIP Pass Code Redemption

Rewarded how?

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Catwoman in Arkham City Requires VIP Pass Code Redemption

Free access to bonus content

Re: Catwoman in Arkham City Requires VIP Pass Code Redemption

I'm sorry to say that that is a poor analysis of the situation. It is not free. It is covered in the cost of the product. The used product is in no way inferior to the new product save for the fact that it is not in the packaging and the product key may or may not have been used - in the situation of games featuring such passes. It is nothing more than an attempt to recoup losses made to used game sales which first parties don't see a penny from. The sad part is that it is an attempt which will work because persons en masse do not decry it and will patronize blindly.

----
Papa Midnight

Re: Catwoman in Arkham City Requires VIP Pass Code Redemption

It depends on how you look at it I suppose. What I see is DLC content with a $10 value that you don't have to purchase separately if you buy the game new. And DLC is exactly what it is - the content is not on the disc.

Re: Catwoman in Arkham City Requires VIP Pass Code Redemption

Like Andrew said earlier, what about the people with no internet access? They bought the game new, but they still can't access their "free" content. How is that fair, even to the people who buy the game new?

Re: Catwoman in Arkham City Requires VIP Pass Code Redemption

My issue is that this is not simply a "DLC" pack that will be added later to keep people playing...it was a major part of the game that they have talked about and stated over and over that it will be part of it for MONTHS now.  The interview I did with Michael Elkind of Warner Brothers Interactive back during the San Diego Comic Con earlier this year covered the addition of Catwoman as a playable character in the game...but it was never mentioned once that it would be a separate DLC.  They announced it as part of the game, as a feature for all to expect and the reason some people may have pre-ordered, but now we see that even that purchase new for some people will not be available because they may not have the ability to download this previously promised and long in development part of the game be it for lack of proper broadband internet, lack of storage, etc.  

Now I generally do appreciate DLC as a way to add to a game as long as it is handled in a respectful way in regards to the consumer. On the last show I recorded, we talked about my issue with it not always being available on a disc somehow, but I am ok with the add ons coming as long as they are not promised and removed just for the sake of trying to force a brand new purchase.  DLC can be a slippery slope and sadly some developers are just choosing to slide right down without a care of how they treat their consumers.

Zen aka Jeremy Powers
Editor and Host of the Zenspath Podcast (now on iTunes)
www.ZensPath.com
XBL: "PsychoticZen" PSN: "Zenspath"
Nintendo Network: "Psychoticzen", 3DS: "3024-7965-4819

Re: Catwoman in Arkham City Requires VIP Pass Code Redemption

And the PC/360 versions?


Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Let's renegotiate them.

---

Patreon

Deviantart

Re: Catwoman in Arkham City Requires VIP Pass Code Redemption

GameStop accepts PC game trade-ins now?

----
Papa Midnight

Re: Catwoman in Arkham City Requires VIP Pass Code Redemption

They did actually say the 360 version the Batman VIP pass costs 800 Microsoft Points.

PC I don't know, but over here in the UK some retailers don't accept PC games for trade in anyway. A couple do like CEX, but second-hand PC games are a bit hard to come by due to the likely-hood of installation codes not working due to them already being used.

“How can one not be fond of something that the Daily Mail despises?” ― Stephen Fry

Re: Catwoman in Arkham City Requires VIP Pass Code Redemption

This is getting ridiculous. I can see this becoming standard operating procedure to punish people who buy a game used. We keep hearing more about online passes for multiplayer and other content that needs a pass to unlock, but this is lame.

-----------------------------------------

Managing Editor at TheBestGameSiteEver.com

Re: Catwoman in Arkham City Requires VIP Pass Code Redemption

We really need a decision made on what media is to us. Is it a product, or a service? 'Cause I think people are starting to get pretty sick of companies, like game publishers, keeping the issue in a state of quantum flux -- defining it differently when it's convenient to them.

If the content is on the disc, and I purchased the disc, do I not have ownership of that copy of the content? Why can the publisher prevent me from accessing it?

Re: Catwoman in Arkham City Requires VIP Pass Code Redemption

Shame about those gamers (like my mom out in Kentucky) who don't have internet access and can't play as Catwoman whether the game is bought new or used.

An online pass to access offline content is exceedingly uncool, Warner Bros.

What's next, an online pass to unlock all of a game's content?

 

Andrew Eisen

*Far as I know, all the Catwoman content is on the disc.

EDIT: Okay, according to IGN's review, the Catwoman content not included on the disc and is indeed downloaded.

Re: Catwoman in Arkham City Requires VIP Pass Code Redemption

That doesn't necessarily mean it's not on the disc. There's plenty of DLC on the market that unlocks items that are already on the disc.

 

Re: Catwoman in Arkham City Requires VIP Pass Code Redemption

I'm more than sure it is...

Absolutely pathetic.

----
Papa Midnight

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Infophileas being "family friendly." A kid could easily flip an option and be hit with a torrent of abuse they weren't expecting.05/26/2015 - 5:30am
InfophileI think Nintendo was between a rock and a hard place with voice chat in Splatoon. Leave it in, and jerks will drive off younger players. Leave it out, and competitive players won't play. Even if it were in but disabled by default, they couldn't sell it...05/26/2015 - 5:29am
Matthew Wilsonthis is a nice video on P.T https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K-85jO6nRNQ05/25/2015 - 11:57pm
Matthew Wilsonmaybe, but its still kinda sad even as a joke.05/25/2015 - 11:51pm
Goth_SkunkThe best commentary is delivered through humour.05/25/2015 - 11:36pm
Andrew EisenIt's not needed. It's a joke. Albeit one with quite a bit of commentary packed into it.05/25/2015 - 10:59pm
Matthew Wilsonmot game related, but still interesting. http://www.polygon.com/2015/5/25/8654983/jurassic-world-chris-pratt-apology the fact that this is even needed in modern culture is a embarrassment.05/25/2015 - 10:26pm
Matthew Wilsonyeah, but with no voice chat its doa.05/25/2015 - 9:48pm
TechnogeekYet, you're going to be hard-pressed to find anyone other than insecure 2EDGY4U teenagers seeing it as anything other than an extremely fun game.05/25/2015 - 8:36pm
TechnogeekSplatoon's probably the best example at this point. Gameplay-wise, it's a team-based third-person shooter with a significant online component. It's rated E10.05/25/2015 - 8:36pm
TechnogeekThe silliest thing about most of the Nintendo hatred is that they may be the last company that interprets "family-friendly" as meaning "fun for more than just the really young kids".05/25/2015 - 8:33pm
ZippyDSMleeWell it could be worse, like skyrim out of the box, a shame DAI dose not have that level of editing...05/25/2015 - 5:58pm
Zenpretty well without getting "nasty". Many people are disappointed in the decision and the about face on the status of the games development.05/25/2015 - 4:22pm
ZenEvery market has horrible people...but being like this towards all of them in a group is not a way to garner support and can make people more hostile towards you. Ironically his response was to someone that wanted to state a disagreement, but worded it05/25/2015 - 4:22pm
Goth_SkunkAs demonstrated by Ian's remarks, that 'market of possible fans' is apparently negligible.05/25/2015 - 4:18pm
Zeninformation while other versions had everything talked about openly.05/25/2015 - 4:15pm
ZenYeah, I've read through it and wanted to make sure I had it quoted correctly. I get there are issues, but this is horribly unprofessional and just burning a market of possible fans..many of which supported them and were waiting while getting little to no05/25/2015 - 4:15pm
Goth_SkunkOh wow. That's not even misquoted, he actually said that. Though for additional context in previous pages, he truly does not think highly of Nintendo console owners, and claims that in the industry, he's not alone.05/25/2015 - 4:12pm
ZenI also took a screenshot of the statement in case it is taken down (via my Twitter): https://twitter.com/zenspath/status/60293960536562483205/25/2015 - 4:05pm
ZenLink for my previous post - http://forum.projectcarsgame.com/showthread.php?27584-Project-Cars-Sales-figures&p=942776&viewfull=1#post94277605/25/2015 - 4:03pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician