UK Neuroscientist Claims Games Can Cause Dementia in Children

October 14, 2011 -

Two UK tabloids - The Sun and The Daily Mail - are highlighting comments from a neuroscientist who claims that video games can cause dementia in children. Neuroscientist Baroness Susan Greenfield told a gathering at the science centre (part of the Sherbourne Girls' School) in Dorset this week that online gaming and activities such as Facebook can "disable connections in the brain" - and in extreme circumstances - cause dementia in children. She also said that, on average, children spend around 2,000 hours a year either playing games or doing other things online.

"Screen technologies cause high arousal which in turn activates the brain system's underlying addiction," she said. "This results in the attraction of yet more screen-based activity."

She went on to say that such activity could cause connections in the brain to be "temporarily disabled",  or even  "inactivated permanently by degeneration — ie. dementia." Other symptoms she mentioned included shortened attention spans and a tendency for reckless behavior.

She also emphasized that children need to spend more time outside and less time on the Internet or playing games.

Baroness Greenfield is Professor of Synaptic Pharmacology (the study of drugs that act on the synapses) at Lincoln College in Oxford, as well as a member of the House of Lords.

While her comments make great fodder for the UK tabloids, both reports do not mention any specific research cited by Greenfield during her speech. We doubt any such research exists, because her comments are simply over the top.

You can read The Sun's report here and the Daily Mail's report here.

Source: MCV


Comments

Re: UK Neuroscientist Claims Games Can Cause Dementia in ...

Actually Susan Greenfield is well known within the scientific community and quite derided, essentially because she constantly makes wild claims (as a scientist) without an basis of evidence. She's well known for being outspoken and playing fast and loose with facts. She abuses her position too much.

She's been controversial and lost her credibility a long time ago.

Re: UK Neuroscientist Claims Games Can Cause Dementia in ...

Did some further reading and found this gem: "'Of course, we do not know whether the current increase in autism is due more to increased awareness and diagnosis of autism, or whether it can - if there is a true increase - be in any way linked to an increased prevalence among people of spending time in screen relationships. Surely it is a point worth considering,' she added."

She thinks using the computer causes Autism. Case closed, this Baroness is a an embarrassment.

Re: UK Neuroscientist Claims Games Can Cause Dementia in ...

From the article "She also said that, on average, children spend around 2,000 hours a year either playing games or doing other things online."

Do a little math and that comes out to 5.5 hours a day, every day. BS. Some kids are on that long and longer but I really doubt the average is that high.

More importantly she presents ZERO data to back up her claims. That makes her claims totally and completely worthless. You can't say stuff like this:

"She went on to say that such activity could cause connections in the brain to be "temporarily disabled",  or even  "inactivated permanently by degeneration — ie. dementia." Other symptoms she mentioned included shortened attention spans and a tendency for reckless behavior."

without sound data to back it up. It just makes you look like a lunatic. Another old stogy dinosaur afraid of technology that she doesn't understand.

Re: UK Neuroscientist Claims Games Can Cause Dementia in ...

I'm smarter than a scientist! :D

Re: UK Neuroscientist Claims Games Can Cause Dementia in ...

For a given value of "scientist" of course.

Re: UK Neuroscientist Claims Games Can Cause Dementia in ...

To quote Christopher Titus

 

"Why am I not psychotic!?!?!?"

Re: UK Neuroscientist Claims Games Can Cause Dementia in ...

What she proabaly forgot to mention was the new drug they were researching that would counteract the effects that these children were going through.  That averages out to just a touch over 5 and a half hours a day every day all year long.  So according to her the average kid gets online at 4pm and doesn't stop till 930pm or so.

Re: UK Neuroscientist Claims Games Can Cause Dementia in ...

By my calculations, it came out to just under 5 & a half hours actually (5.47 to be precise). And I'm pretty sure most of those take place at school, for academic purposes, under teacher supervision. So she's basically bashing today's education.

Re: UK Neuroscientist Claims Games Can Cause Dementia in ...

Based solely off the fact that it was reported by the Daily Mail, I am going to assume that the actual comments were far more tempered and reasonable than the article claims.

Re: UK Neuroscientist Claims Games Can Cause Dementia in ...

No, I wouldn't doubt that she'd actually say something like this.

What Ben Goldacre had to say about her a couple of years ago is worth reading.

(With the caveat that I think his second point, while it's something I personally agree with, is kind of neither here nor there.)

Re: UK Neuroscientist Claims Games Can Cause Dementia in ...

Yeah, being sourced in the Sun and the Daily Mail doesn't exactly make for overwhelming credibility!

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Matthew Wilsonthe issue is when is doesn't work it can screw over millions in new york city's case. more often than not it is better to let the free market run its course without market distortion.04/16/2014 - 9:36am
NeenekoTrue, and overdone stagnation is a problem. It is a tricky balance. It does not help that when it does work, no one notices. Most people here have benifited from rent controls and not even realized it.04/16/2014 - 9:23am
ZippyDSMleehttp://www.afterdawn.com/news/article.cfm/2014/04/15/riaa_files_civil_suit_against_megaupload04/16/2014 - 8:48am
ZippyDSMleeEither way you get stagnation as people can not afford the prices they set.04/16/2014 - 8:47am
Neenekowell, specifically it helps people already living there and hurts people who want to live there instead. As for 'way more hurt', majorities generally need less legal protection. yes it hurt more people then it helped, it was written for a minority04/16/2014 - 8:30am
MaskedPixelantehttp://torrentfreak.com/square-enix-drm-boosts-profits-and-its-here-to-stay-140415/ Square proves how incredibly out of touch they are by saying that DRM is the way of the future, and is here to stay.04/16/2014 - 8:29am
james_fudgeUnwinnable Weekly Telethon playing Metal Gear http://www.twitch.tv/rainydayletsplay04/16/2014 - 8:06am
ConsterTo be fair, there's so little left of the middle class that those numbers are skewing.04/16/2014 - 7:42am
Matthew Wilsonyes it help a sub section of the poor, but hurt both the middle and upper class. in the end way more people were hurt than helped. also, it hurt most poor people as well.04/16/2014 - 12:13am
SeanBJust goes to show what I have said for years. Your ability to have sex does not qualify you for parenthood.04/15/2014 - 9:21pm
NeenekoSo "worked" vs "failed" really comes down to who you think is more important and deserving04/15/2014 - 7:04pm
NeenekoThough I am also not sure we can say NYC failed. Rent control helped the people it was intended for and is considered a failure by the people it was designed to protect them from.04/15/2014 - 7:04pm
NeenekoIf they change the rules, demand will plummet. Though yeah, rent control probably would not help much in the SF case. I doubt anything will.04/15/2014 - 1:35pm
TheSmokeyOnline gamer accused of murdering son to keep playing - http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Crime/2014/04/15/21604921.html04/15/2014 - 11:50am
Matthew Wilsonyup, but curent city rules do not allow for that.04/15/2014 - 11:00am
ZippyDSMleeIf SF dose not start building upwards then they will price people out of the aera.04/15/2014 - 10:59am
Matthew Wilsonthe issue rent control has it reduces supply, and in SF case they already has a supply problem. rent control ofen puts rent below cost, or below profit of selling it. rent control would not fix this issue.04/15/2014 - 10:56am
NeenekoRent control is useful in moderation, NYC took it way to far and tends to be held up as an example of them not working, but in most cases they are more subtle and positive.04/15/2014 - 10:24am
PHX CorpBeating Cancer with Video Games http://mashable.com/2014/04/14/steven-gonzalez-survivor-games/04/15/2014 - 9:21am
Matthew Wilsonwhat are you saying SF should do rent control, that has never worked every time it has been tried. the issue here is a self inflicted supply problem imposed by stupid laws.04/15/2014 - 8:52am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician