UK Neuroscientist Claims Games Can Cause Dementia in Children

October 14, 2011 -

Two UK tabloids - The Sun and The Daily Mail - are highlighting comments from a neuroscientist who claims that video games can cause dementia in children. Neuroscientist Baroness Susan Greenfield told a gathering at the science centre (part of the Sherbourne Girls' School) in Dorset this week that online gaming and activities such as Facebook can "disable connections in the brain" - and in extreme circumstances - cause dementia in children. She also said that, on average, children spend around 2,000 hours a year either playing games or doing other things online.

"Screen technologies cause high arousal which in turn activates the brain system's underlying addiction," she said. "This results in the attraction of yet more screen-based activity."

She went on to say that such activity could cause connections in the brain to be "temporarily disabled",  or even  "inactivated permanently by degeneration — ie. dementia." Other symptoms she mentioned included shortened attention spans and a tendency for reckless behavior.

She also emphasized that children need to spend more time outside and less time on the Internet or playing games.

Baroness Greenfield is Professor of Synaptic Pharmacology (the study of drugs that act on the synapses) at Lincoln College in Oxford, as well as a member of the House of Lords.

While her comments make great fodder for the UK tabloids, both reports do not mention any specific research cited by Greenfield during her speech. We doubt any such research exists, because her comments are simply over the top.

You can read The Sun's report here and the Daily Mail's report here.

Source: MCV


Comments

Re: UK Neuroscientist Claims Games Can Cause Dementia in ...

Actually Susan Greenfield is well known within the scientific community and quite derided, essentially because she constantly makes wild claims (as a scientist) without an basis of evidence. She's well known for being outspoken and playing fast and loose with facts. She abuses her position too much.

She's been controversial and lost her credibility a long time ago.

Re: UK Neuroscientist Claims Games Can Cause Dementia in ...

Did some further reading and found this gem: "'Of course, we do not know whether the current increase in autism is due more to increased awareness and diagnosis of autism, or whether it can - if there is a true increase - be in any way linked to an increased prevalence among people of spending time in screen relationships. Surely it is a point worth considering,' she added."

She thinks using the computer causes Autism. Case closed, this Baroness is a an embarrassment.

Re: UK Neuroscientist Claims Games Can Cause Dementia in ...

From the article "She also said that, on average, children spend around 2,000 hours a year either playing games or doing other things online."

Do a little math and that comes out to 5.5 hours a day, every day. BS. Some kids are on that long and longer but I really doubt the average is that high.

More importantly she presents ZERO data to back up her claims. That makes her claims totally and completely worthless. You can't say stuff like this:

"She went on to say that such activity could cause connections in the brain to be "temporarily disabled",  or even  "inactivated permanently by degeneration — ie. dementia." Other symptoms she mentioned included shortened attention spans and a tendency for reckless behavior."

without sound data to back it up. It just makes you look like a lunatic. Another old stogy dinosaur afraid of technology that she doesn't understand.

Re: UK Neuroscientist Claims Games Can Cause Dementia in ...

I'm smarter than a scientist! :D

Re: UK Neuroscientist Claims Games Can Cause Dementia in ...

For a given value of "scientist" of course.

Re: UK Neuroscientist Claims Games Can Cause Dementia in ...

To quote Christopher Titus

 

"Why am I not psychotic!?!?!?"

Re: UK Neuroscientist Claims Games Can Cause Dementia in ...

What she proabaly forgot to mention was the new drug they were researching that would counteract the effects that these children were going through.  That averages out to just a touch over 5 and a half hours a day every day all year long.  So according to her the average kid gets online at 4pm and doesn't stop till 930pm or so.

Re: UK Neuroscientist Claims Games Can Cause Dementia in ...

By my calculations, it came out to just under 5 & a half hours actually (5.47 to be precise). And I'm pretty sure most of those take place at school, for academic purposes, under teacher supervision. So she's basically bashing today's education.

Re: UK Neuroscientist Claims Games Can Cause Dementia in ...

Based solely off the fact that it was reported by the Daily Mail, I am going to assume that the actual comments were far more tempered and reasonable than the article claims.

Re: UK Neuroscientist Claims Games Can Cause Dementia in ...

No, I wouldn't doubt that she'd actually say something like this.

What Ben Goldacre had to say about her a couple of years ago is worth reading.

(With the caveat that I think his second point, while it's something I personally agree with, is kind of neither here nor there.)

Re: UK Neuroscientist Claims Games Can Cause Dementia in ...

Yeah, being sourced in the Sun and the Daily Mail doesn't exactly make for overwhelming credibility!

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

How do you usually divide up your Humble Bundle payments?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
MaskedPixelantehttp://i5.minus.com/iN5o9iu1ON2NG.jpg "It cursed my gear? WHY WOULD IT DO THAT?! THIS GAME IS BUGGED!"04/24/2014 - 9:51pm
Matthew Wilsonthe lose of nn would not be good for us, but it will not be good for verizion/comcast/att in the long run ether.04/24/2014 - 2:16pm
Matthew Wilsonsadly yes. it would take another sopa day to achieve it.04/24/2014 - 2:13pm
NeenekoI am also confused. Are you saying NN would only become law if Google/Netflix pushed the issue (against their own interests)?04/24/2014 - 2:10pm
E. Zachary KnightMatthew, you are saying a lot of things but I am still unclear on your point. Are you saying that the loss of Net Neutrality will be good in the long run?04/24/2014 - 2:06pm
Matthew WilsonOfcourse it does I never said it did not.though over time the death of NN will make backbone providers like Google, level3 and others stronger becouse most isps including the big ones can not provid internet without them. they can peer with smaller isps04/24/2014 - 1:54pm
E. Zachary KnightMatthew, and that still plays in Google's favor over their smaller rivals who don't have the muscle to stand up to ISPs.04/24/2014 - 1:45pm
Matthew Wilsongoogle wont pay becouse they control a large part of the backbone that all isps depend on. if verizon blocks their data, google does the same. the effect is Verizon loses access to 40% of the internet, and can not serve some areas at all.04/24/2014 - 1:14pm
Neenekolack of NN is in google and netflix interest. It is another tool for squeezing out smaller companies since they can afford to 'play'04/24/2014 - 12:57pm
Matthew WilsonI have said it before net nutrality will not be made in to law until Google or Netflix is blocked, or they do what they did for sopa and pull their sites down in protest.04/23/2014 - 8:02pm
Andrew EisenGee, I guess putting a former cable industry lobbyist as the Chairman of the FCC wasn't that great of an idea. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/04/24/technology/fcc-new-net-neutrality-rules.html?_r=204/23/2014 - 7:26pm
Andrew EisenIanC - I assume what he's getting at is the fact that once PS3/360 development ceases, there will be no more "For Everything But Wii U" games.04/23/2014 - 5:49pm
Andrew EisenMatthew - Yes, obviously developers will eventually move on from the PS3 and 360 but the phrase will continue to mean exactly what it means.04/23/2014 - 5:45pm
IanCAnd how does that equal his annoying phrase being meaningless?04/23/2014 - 5:09pm
Matthew Wilson@Andrew Eisen the phrase everything but wiiu will be meaningless afer this year becouse devs will drop 360/ps3 support.04/23/2014 - 4:43pm
Andrew EisenFor Everything But... 360? Huh, not many games can claim that title. Only three others that I know of.04/23/2014 - 3:45pm
MaskedPixelantehttp://www.joystiq.com/2014/04/23/another-world-rated-for-current-consoles-handhelds-in-germany/ Another World fulfills legal obligations of being on every gaming system under the sun.04/23/2014 - 12:34pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://arstechnica.com/gaming/2014/04/steam-gauge-do-strong-reviews-lead-to-stronger-sales-on-steam/?comments=1 Here is another data driven article using sales data from steam to figure out if reviews effect sales. It is stats heavy like the last one.04/23/2014 - 11:33am
Andrew EisenI love RPGs but I didn't much care for Tales of Symphonia. I didn't bother with its sequel.04/23/2014 - 11:21am
InfophileIt had great RPGs because MS wanted to use them to break into Japan. (Which had the side-effect of screwing NA PS3 owners out of Tales of Vesperia. No, I'm not bitter, why do you ask?)04/23/2014 - 10:52am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician