Epic: Console Makers Need to Let Developers Handle Game Pricing

October 26, 2011

In an interview with Develop Epic Games President Michael Capps says that console makers need to loosen the stranglehold they have on developers when it comes to pricing. Capps says they need to do this because game revenues have shifted to service and micro-transaction model. Currently developers can't decide what the price of their games on consoles should be because those prices are already set by the console makers.

"Right now we’re not even allowed to change the prices of virtual content," said Capps. "We’re not even allowed to set the prices. I just don’t think this protectionist approach is going to be successful in a world where the price of virtual items changes on a day-today basis."

Capps adds that mobile platforms allow developers to set their own pricing schemes and purchasing virtual goods within an app is much easier too. Finally, he notes that the only way for AA games to make a comeback is if manufacturers forget about a specific price point like $60. If they don't, he says, more developers will simply turn to the PC market - Steam, for example.

"The console manufacturers need to let this happen,” he said. "The best way of driving developers to PC is telling them they have no freedom in what prices they can set for virtual items. It would be great to have the level of freedom that, say, Steam gives you."

Source: Develop


Comments

Re: Epic: Console Makers Need to Let Developers Handle Game ...

Why wasn't this done sooner. Games tend to either be $15 or less and the $60. Why isn't there somewhere in the middle for games that fit in that category. I would go with Catherine, since I had to rent it because I heard it ws great, but not worth the full sticker price. Which I agreed with.

-----------------------------------------

Managing Editor at TheBestGameSiteEver.com

Re: Epic: Console Makers Need to Let Developers Handle Game ...

I thought game pricing was the publisher's call, not the console manufacturer's (unless they're the publisher).

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Epic: Console Makers Need to Let Developers Handle Game ...

I can certainly get behind this call for better pricing. There are a number of games that I would never buy at over $40. But if they were to drop to $20-30, I would certainly consider them. This especially helps with smaller developers which don't have name recognition already built up.

Re: Epic: Console Makers Need to Let Developers Handle Game ...

If I could figure out how to applaud over the internet I would

Re: Epic: Console Makers Need to Let Developers Handle Game ...

Oh yeah, the last thing we would want is for a developer to make something for PC.  That would be terrible!  Jesus, what happened to you, Epic?  Makers of Jill of the Jungle, Jazz Jackrabbit, and frickin' Unreal (Tournament!!!)!  What happened?

Re: Epic: Console Makers Need to Let Developers Handle Game ...

I've been waiting nearly 5 years for Heavy Weapon on XBLA to drop from $10. This is getting ridiculous.

http://marketplace.xbox.com/en-US/Product/Heavy-Weapon/66acd000-77fe-100...

(Btw, the pc version on Steam is awful.)

Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
ZippyDSMleeComp seems fixed YAY!!!!05/25/2012 - 6:17pm
E. Zachary KnightGamasutra explores the failure of Streetfighter X Tekken and has one of the best arguments against on-disk DLC I have ever read: http://tinyurl.com/d399ylu05/25/2012 - 1:46pm
ddrfr33kabout the xbox live hacks from last year, now we know: http://kotaku.com/5913228/report-how-scammers-are-stealing-xbox-live-accounts-and-what-they-do-with-them05/25/2012 - 12:31pm
tallimarhttp://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-57440902-94/microsoft-legal-win-over-google-may-signal-ceasefire/05/24/2012 - 10:17pm
ZippyDSMleeTIme or an operation!05/24/2012 - 6:43pm
ZippyDSMleePC parts are in wish me luck or hell!!05/24/2012 - 6:43pm
MaskedPixelante38 Studios and Big Huge Games are pretty much dead now. http://www.joystiq.com/2012/05/24/38-studios-and-big-huge-games-lay-off-entire-staffs05/24/2012 - 4:39pm
DorthLousActually, nop, I did miss the emoticon for some reason (getting used to pics?) and I didn't know you changed it since (since I posted previous to my shout and it was still there.) Anyhow, thanks for taking it out!05/23/2012 - 6:01pm
james_fudgeWell we were just testing it. but it is still on the submission to fight $pam.05/23/2012 - 5:48pm
E. Zachary KnightJames, No I don't have it. I was just wondering who does and why. More curiosity than anything.05/23/2012 - 5:38pm
james_fudgeDid you not see the emoticon and did you not see that it has already been changed back?05/23/2012 - 5:10pm
james_fudgeLOL05/23/2012 - 5:07pm
DorthLousWhy? Not shocked that people are barking to an additional hoop to jump through when posting from their already logged in account or just mentionning this to try to paint me as one always complaining?05/23/2012 - 4:45pm
james_fudgebig shock there ;)05/23/2012 - 4:30pm
DorthLousI'll add my voice to those wanting it gone :S I'm already logged in, I don't need a captch'a. That's for those registering.05/23/2012 - 3:54pm
james_fudgeEt tu EZK?!?05/23/2012 - 3:51pm
Craig R.I'm a One Man Quorum! And it's working for me now, thanks. :)05/23/2012 - 3:48pm
E. Zachary KnightHow do we determine who get's the game/captcha thingy? Is there a certain posting threshhold users have to meet before it is turned off?05/23/2012 - 2:25pm
james_fudgeGive it a chance, we're still adjusting it ;)05/23/2012 - 11:20am
james_fudgeOne does not a Quorum make Craig.05/23/2012 - 11:16am

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician