Newzoo: 56 Percent of U.S. Gamers Regularly Buy Used

November 3, 2011 -

A new market study conducted by research firm Newzoo indicates that trading games is the most popular game of all. More than half of the 82 million gamers in the U.S. don't spend money on games, and of the 44 percent who make game purchases around 85 percent regularly purchase pre-owned titles. Around 23 percent of the game-buying public spends 23 percent of their gaming budget on pre-owned games says Newzoo.

The report also predicts that the DLC market will be worth $960 million in US sales by year's end. Around 12 percent of money spent on games in the US goes towards DLC, according to Newzoo. The research firm also predicts that U.S. and European consumers will spend $1.7 billion on DLC in 2011.

Publishers and developers often lament about the used games market because they don't make money off anything but the first sale. Obviously they have turned to code-based systems as means of charging a gateway fee to those who buy used and want to play online.

Source: The Escapist

 


Comments

Re: Newzoo: 56 Percent of U.S. Gamers Regularly Buy Used

dumb thought but if they lowred the prices back down to $40-$50 USD range this wouldn't be as big an issue.

most people buy used because the asking price of a new release used game (at most stores anyways) is anywhere from $50 to $55, a whopping 5 to 10 bux off!

not much you say? seems to be enough to get people to go for them.

simple inital exam would say, sell at that price new, and new sales would clearly go back up. people had already voiced their opinion of this $10 hike years ago. i don't disagree and think there shouldn't have been some raise. but given the quality and rehashed content lately, even i'm skeptical of pricing half the time. i Mean when most games are barely an expansion of the previous game (such as each CoD lately having been nothing but minor engine updates and new stories/perks/weapons, most of it sold as DLC AFTER release but on disc) it gets questionable.

especially with SP campagins getting short handed for add on content that clearly was intended to be part of the game, MP getting minimal maps (maybe 5 or so at first) and then companies charging up to $15 USD for THREE maps... half the contents there for twice the price...

Re: Newzoo: 56 Percent of U.S. Gamers Regularly Buy Used

What publishers (and to a lesser extent developers) often seem to forget here is that if you have a lot of used games for sale, you evidently had a lot of new sales.  Used games don't just appear on the shelves by themselves.

Re: Newzoo: 56 Percent of U.S. Gamers Regularly Buy Used

The thing that drives me nuts about this is that it could be fixed by setting it up so used games gave a percent to the publisher like new games do, and it wouldn't be much harder to set up than the new game system is either.

Re: Newzoo: 56 Percent of U.S. Gamers Regularly Buy Used

That's bullshit. Should the people that made your clothes or furniture get a cut if you sell them? How about auto makers? Should they get something when you sell your car? Game publishers aren't entitled to anything in a secondary market. If they want to make money from those people buying used, they should just adjust the price where those people would buy it new instead.

-Greevar

"Paste superficially profound, but utterly meaningless quotation here."

Re: Newzoo: 56 Percent of U.S. Gamers Regularly Buy Used

With the number of closures and mergers and name changes and buy outs etc that happen in the industry, it is far harder than it sounds. Especially when you go back to previous generations of consoles.

Re: Newzoo: 56 Percent of U.S. Gamers Regularly Buy Used

I guess that puts me in the 6.6% trying to send the money where it belongs: to the people who will make more games.

Re: Newzoo: 56 Percent of U.S. Gamers Regularly Buy Used

News Flash: Whether you buy it new or used, your money goes to the same place: The retailer, person, or entity you bought the game from.

In fact, the developers and publishers already got their money the moment the game hits the shelves. So don't fool yourself into thinking you're supporting the developer by buying new.

So unless you buy your game directly from the publisher, you're not doing them any favors one way or the other.

Re: Newzoo: 56 Percent of U.S. Gamers Regularly Buy Used

Cool story, bro.  Whatever helps you sleep at night.

Re: Newzoo: 56 Percent of U.S. Gamers Regularly Buy Used

So basically you have absolutely zero idea on how retail works.

Re: Newzoo: 56 Percent of U.S. Gamers Regularly Buy Used

because every game is always being sold in every store /sarcasm

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Will Code Avarice's Paranautical Activity make its way back onto Steam?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
prh99Honestly I've never liked Gawker, and considering their own behavior the self righteous indignation in the wake of GG rings a bit hollow. If my email causes them to lose money I will not feel even a twinge of guilt.10/23/2014 - 1:00pm
Papa MidnightNeo_DrKefka: Till outlets such as IGN and GameSpot so much as even acknowledge the mere existence of "GamerGate", I highly doubt it will affect their modus operandi anytime in the future - near or otherwise.10/23/2014 - 12:26pm
Neo_DrKefkaWhat GamerGate is essentially doing whether people like it or not its going to change the gamingmedia but inturn its also going to replace some outlets & practice the same wrongs they claim they fought against. Its happening already look at TheRalphRetort10/23/2014 - 12:18pm
Neo_DrKefkaIf a company claims it supports the Klan or another offensive organization than the advertiser needs to make sure they're brand is not tainted so they pull they're ads. One side does not determine the right to determine what is universally offensive.10/23/2014 - 12:14pm
Neo_DrKefkaActions have consequences however. If you do a Bioware and insult EA's customers would you be suprised if they lost advertisers and customers? Advertisers are not giving money to charity to they putting ads to make money.10/23/2014 - 12:13pm
Matthew Wilsonwhile I disagree with people pushing pressure on advertisers, consumers do not have many other options to show there disagreements with a article or writer. if people are going to do it, it should be for somthing much worse then that guy did.10/23/2014 - 12:10pm
Neo_DrKefkaNow they are about KingofPol & InternetAristocrat making streams that are bait and switch Streams that claims they are about GG but are about them getting drunk and them making fun of Autistic people10/23/2014 - 12:09pm
Neo_DrKefkahttp://tinyurl.com/nhlbgq8 These people some of them are using GamerGate to prop there careers up. GamerGate streams used to be about ideas of change and solutions to problems.10/23/2014 - 12:09pm
Neo_DrKefkaI believe the message of #GamerGate but I do not believe in the Cult of Personality that has formed. Where sites like TechRaptor gained exposure and they are a great site. Sites like TheRalphReport are using this movement for there own personal gain.10/23/2014 - 12:05pm
ZippyDSMleeSo has the whole GG thing become toxic to the point its time to move on yet?10/23/2014 - 11:54am
prh99As for GG, I am surprised they haven't pulled out every 4chan spawned mob and script kiddie's favorite tool, LOIC to DDoS their foes. Or maybe they did and I missed it.10/23/2014 - 11:38am
BillIn his article Max says "I've been told that we've lost thousands of dollars already, and could potentially lose thousands more, if not millions."10/23/2014 - 11:25am
BillJames, do you think new advertisers won't bring this up when negotiating Ad rates? From a business standpoint, if I were to advertise on Gawker I would point to this and be pretty firm on lower rates.10/23/2014 - 11:21am
prh99Had my say, what they do after that is their business. Though calling your current advertisers "craven idiots" and "pusillanimous morons" probably isn't all that smart if you are going to complain about lost revenue from pulled ads.10/23/2014 - 11:18am
james_fudgeand when they do they will innoculate themselves from this stuff before the deal is even signed10/23/2014 - 11:02am
james_fudgewhen you do that much traffic you can always replace advertisers, guys10/23/2014 - 11:02am
prh99I helped him out and emailed Gawkers advertisers with the message "This is how Gawker covers you when they disagree with you". Not necessarily as support for GG but he is just down right insulting. 10/23/2014 - 10:48am
BillI think he got rolled twice. They made him mad enough to insult a possible advertiser. Other advertisers are going to notice this. It may be cathartic for him, but it's not good business.10/23/2014 - 9:17am
Billhttp://gawker.com/how-we-got-rolled-by-the-dishonest-fascists-of-gamergat-164949657910/23/2014 - 9:14am
Andrew EisenMarvel also shows it understands that once it leaks, it's out there and went ahead and officially released the trailer. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmeOjFno6Do10/22/2014 - 9:36pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician