Republican Senate Resolution to Kill FCC Net Neutrality Rules Fails

November 11, 2011 -

Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison's (R-Texas) effort in the Senate to kill the FCC's net neutrality rules has failed. The Senate voted, 46-52, against moving forward with a resolution that would have overturned federal regulations enacted in 2010 that govern anti-competitive behavior online.

"It's time to push back" against federal agencies that are overreaching their authority and enacting burdensome regulations, she argued before the Senate voted on a motion to proceed.

In the end, Hutchison was unable to gather enough support for the measure, which the White House would have vetoed if it had passed. The GOP-controlled House approved a resolution in April, but Democrats in the Senate promised to stop Hutchison's effort. As ranking member of the Senate Commerce Committee, Hutchison did an end-run around the committee by gathering 40 signatures to force the full Senate to consider the resolution. The measure failed along party-lines.

Democrats argued that the FCC's new rules were necessary to prevent large corporations from throttling Internet access.

"The FCC's Open Internet rules mean that small entrepreneurs will not have to seek permission from broadband providers to reach new markets and consumers with innovative products and services," Commerce Chairman Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., said during debate on the Senate floor on Wednesday. "Far from preventing investment, the FCC's Open Internet rules will foster small businesses and support their demonstrated ability to create jobs."

Source: The Atlantic


Comments

Re: Republican Senate Resolution to Kill FCC Net Neutrality ...

I support anything that makes Kay Bailey Hutchison look like an idiot. Speaking as a Houstonian she represents almost everything bad about Texas. Conversely Rick Perry represents the rest of the bad things about Texas that Kay Bailey Hutchison somehow missed.

Re: Republican Senate Resolution to Kill FCC Net Neutrality ...

The great burden of not doing something most of them hadn't started doing yet anyway. Mmm mmm that's some political baggage right there. Those poor corporations.

Re: Republican Senate Resolution to Kill FCC Net Neutrality ...

No, Ms. Hutchison, we didn't vote you in to make consumer-unfriendly legislation.  We voted you in to make JOBS happen.  This doesn't make JOBS.  This just makes things anticompetitive.

Re: Republican Senate Resolution to Kill FCC Net Neutrality ...

Burdensome? Oh boy.

Re: Republican Senate Resolution to Kill FCC Net Neutrality ...

"It's time to push back" against federal agencies that are overreaching their authority and enacting burdensome regulations,"

 

You mean like telling someone who they can and cannot legally marry?

Re: Republican Senate Resolution to Kill FCC Net Neutrality ...

Oh, snap!

Re: Republican Senate Resolution to Kill FCC Net Neutrality ...

Ssssshhhhh, you have to present that reality to some of them slooowly.

 

Re: Republican Senate Resolution to Kill FCC Net Neutrality ...

Screw slowly, There's times I want to tattoo the truth onto their foreheads. It seems like that would be the closest alot of politicians would come to it.

Hunting the shadows of the troubled dreams.
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Mattsworknamefor gamers to hold the media sites they had issues with accountable? If we look at those questions, I think we find the answer to the first one07/28/2015 - 8:20pm
MattsworknameEZK: I can't answer that, Im split on it cause I feel both are wrong ,but at the same time, I don't know if theres other ways to go about those seperate con.cerns. Was there a better way for feminists to make there point about GTA? was there a better way07/28/2015 - 8:20pm
MechaTama31Ok, a very different topic.07/28/2015 - 8:13pm
MechaTama31On a slightly different topic, in about a month my fiance will be a Mrs., but I'll still be a Mr., as I've always been. Hardly seems fair. I want a nifty new title!07/28/2015 - 8:13pm
E. Zachary KnightMatt, So, what is it? Is petitioning Intel to pull ads from Gamasutra "bullying and threatening" or is it justified? You can't have it both ways, especially if petition Target is "bullying and threatening".07/28/2015 - 8:10pm
Andrew EisenWhat this comes across as is "we need to find a way to silence anyone who says something we don't like."07/28/2015 - 8:08pm
Andrew EisenAnd how was Gamasutra not accountable for the opinion piece it published and refused to pull or edit even after advertising had been pulled?07/28/2015 - 8:08pm
Andrew EisenThere are tons of options when it comes to an opinion piece you don't agree with. Stating otherwise is dishonest or shows an extraordinary lack of imagination.07/28/2015 - 8:07pm
Mattsworknamethem acounatble. We just didn't have many opttions at the time07/28/2015 - 8:05pm
MattsworknameEZK:I never said it was justified, I just said that some people felt they didn't have any other means to hold them accountable. Weather it's justifited or not is somethign to debate, but I was never a big fan of it cause I wanted some other way to hold07/28/2015 - 8:04pm
Mattsworknameprice07/28/2015 - 8:03pm
MattsworknameAndrew: Your not wrong andrew, but gamasutra , and others like it , were called to task by the audiance that felt they had turned there backs on them. True or not, in media, you have to know how to reach an audiance, and chosing not to, well, you pay a07/28/2015 - 8:03pm
Andrew EisenAt the end of the day, even when Intel pulled its advertising (albeit, temporarily), Gamasutra showed its journalistic integrity by not removing or editing the opinion piece.07/28/2015 - 8:00pm
Andrew EisenNot liking Gamasutra is fine. The audience is primarily industry folk and it's not a game-focused site so it's probably not targeting you anyway.07/28/2015 - 7:57pm
E. Zachary KnightMAtt, So, an online petition asking Target to stop selling GTAV is "bullying and threatening" but a petition and boycott of Intel to force them to stop advertising on Gamasutra is justified?07/28/2015 - 7:56pm
Andrew EisenTrue or not, what it came across as a bunch of people lashing out at a publication over an opinion piece.07/28/2015 - 7:56pm
MattsworknameTo be honest, I've never liked them, but mostly cause rather then being a game focused site, they felt to political for my taste07/28/2015 - 7:56pm
Andrew EisenAnd in the case of Gamasutra?07/28/2015 - 7:54pm
Mattsworknameour concerns about them were well founded.07/28/2015 - 7:50pm
MattsworknameDepends on who you ask, accountable fto it's audiance, accountablie for lies and half truths, accountible for disengenous statements, everyone had there own reasons for going after them. Although in the case of gawker, recent events seem to indicate that07/28/2015 - 7:50pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician