Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

November 15, 2011 -

Yesterday, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) launched its Mario Kills Tanooki campaign, a stunt meant to draw attention to the plight of the real-life tanooki that is apparently killed for its fur in some parts of the world.

Perhaps not so coincidentally, Super Mario 3D Land released the day before and one of Mario’s power-ups is the Tanooki suit (pictured).  Yeah, I’m sure you can see where this is going.

According to PETA, “[by] wearing Tanooki, Mario is sending the message that it's OK to wear fur.”  The organization even released a Flash game in which you play as a skinless tanooki chasing after Mario in an attempt to reclaim its hide.

Speaking to Eurogamer, Nintendo commented on PETA’s claim that Mario is pro-fur.

"Mario often takes the appearance of certain animals and objects in his games.  These have included a frog, a penguin, a balloon and even a metallic version of himself. These lighthearted and whimsical transformations give Mario different abilities and make his games fun to play.

The different forms that Mario takes make no statement beyond the games themselves."


Aww, that wasn’t as fun as Majesco’s response a few years ago when PETA parodied Cooking Mama to promote meat-free diets.  Come on, Nintendo.  Get Charles Martinet to record a message to PETA as Mario!

Source:           Eurogamer

-Reporting from San Diego, GamePolitics Contributing Editor Andrew Eisen

Posted in

Comments

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

I liked Kotaku's write-up on this, where they explain that in Japanese culture a tanooki is basically the equivalent of a lawn gnome.

And up until recently, I didn't even know it was based on a real animal lol

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

"Tanooki" is japanese for "raccoon." According to Shigeru Miyamoto, there's a japanese legend where a raccoon can put a leaf on it's head and turn into a statue. How it makes it fly, he didn't say. 

At any rate, I'm pretty sure PETA knows everyone's laughing at them now. So why we giving them the attention they're begging for? I'm talking to you, Nintendo.

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

I thought the BF3 rat was bad... I'm fully convinced now that PETA has NOTHING better to do with their time.

----
Papa Midnight

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

when have they ever shown interest in actually furthering their agenda over just fear mongering people and killing things so they can make more money by lieing about how it was done?

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

Um... The tanooki and even the frog powerups first came out in SMB3. It came out in 1989. Their complaint is a little late. About twenty-two YEARS too late. Nice try PETA. You are still a bunch of media whores, with no real voice. - W

Consumer responsibility is just as important as Corporate responsibility. So, be responsible consumers.

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

Nintendo: "Mario's tanooki suit is made of 100% fake fur. No tanooki's were harmed in the making of this game."

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

Hell, look at this article's pic.  That's official Nintendo art.  Mario's outfit isn't fur period, faux or otherwise.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

Nintendo: "PETA is mistaken. We can assure you that Mario does not use any real fur in his costumes. His costumes are made out of 100% Polygotton. Its a finer material than the old Pixwool he used to use before the 64-bit era."

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

Um PETA, I hate to tell you this, but THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH PEOPLE WEARING FUR!!!!

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

Not to defend PETA, but this is actually a debatable topic.  Fur farming is pretty gruesome, and if one accepts the idea that non-human animals can feel pain etc then it can be argued that supporting such an industry is unethical.

But that gets into the whole issue of the soul and other theological issues.

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

I wasn't aware anyone ever debated whether animals could feel pain.  Or course they can, it's how they know they've been injured.

Anyway, from an ethics standpoint, I'd say killing critters just for their fur is a no-no.  We're not cavemen anymore, we don't need animal pelts to survive.  Now, killing critters for something like food and then using their fur for material goods I think is fine.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

Fun history fact:  It used to be common belief that animals could not feel pain because they did not have souls.  Scientists found it interesting that animals would make sounds remarkably similar to human pain sounds during vivisections.

===============

Chris Kimberley

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

People wore fur centuries ago, long before PETA existed, and they'll continue now. What would you do if your precious "leaders" were attacked and killed by the very animals you're trying to "protect"?

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

they'd protest the killing of the "innocent animals" as soon as the cops shot them.

they've done it before when animals had mauled people to death and were in the process of attacking others (fine example is the incident in Connecticut with the chimp. the police shot it because it was attempting to break into their vehicle and get them)

these people actually value these animals lives over their own species, regardless of the situation.

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

I don't know, if the animals were mauling the Leaders of PeTA, I'd think it'd be kind of tough to find a cop that would want to shoot the animal.cheeky

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

It's a tanooki actually a creature of legend, actually spelled tanuki?

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

Haven't even bothered to Google this so just correct me if I'm wrong, but...

Assuming it is a creature of legend, and assuming (reasonably so I think) that it's a Japanese legend in question, then it's actually spelled in a completely different alphabet.  The only real reason to favour Tanooki or Tanuki is the exact pronunciation of the word.  As I recall the double vowel indicates that the vowel is actually held longer when spoken.

===============

Chris Kimberley

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

It is properly spelled Tanuki, not tanooki. Us stupid gaijin. :P

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

Nintendo spells it "tanooki."  That's good enough for me.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

Silly shit like this is why no one takes PETA seriously.

Well that and the fact they kill more animals than any animal shelter.

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

they kill more than they shelter, they use leather, and they PAY people to MURDER animals so they can make videos of it being done.

yep, they so want to help the critters they themselves kill for profit..

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
E. Zachary KnightGot that same recommendation on Twitter. So I guess that is a good sign.09/15/2014 - 8:39pm
prh99Portlandia, though I don't watch a lot of sitcoms. Heard it was good though.09/15/2014 - 8:02pm
E. Zachary KnightSitcom recommendations for someone who like Parks and Rec but hates The Office: Go.09/15/2014 - 6:08pm
NeenekoEven if they do change their policy, they can only do it moving forward and I could see the mod/pack community simply branching.09/15/2014 - 12:50pm
Michael ChandraAs for take the money and run, the guy must have a networth of 8~9 digits already.09/15/2014 - 10:33am
Michael ChandraMe, I'm more betting on some form of mod API where servers must run donations/payments through them and they take a cut.09/15/2014 - 10:32am
Michael ChandraEspecially since they want it for promoting their phones. Killing user interest is the dumbest move to make.09/15/2014 - 10:32am
Michael ChandraGiven how the EULA actively allows for LPs, I'm not sure Microsoft is ready for the backlash of disallowing that.09/15/2014 - 10:31am
Matthew Wilsonthey wont do that, the backlash would be too big.09/15/2014 - 10:25am
ConsterSleaker: how is that a flipside? Sounds to me like that's basically what Notch himself said, except rudely.09/15/2014 - 10:18am
MaskedPixelanteOn the plus side, no more lazy Minecraft LPs, since iirc Microsoft has a strict "no monetization period" policy when it comes to their stuff.09/15/2014 - 10:13am
james_fudgeBut it continues to sell on every platform it is on, so there's that09/15/2014 - 10:09am
james_fudgeOh, well that's another matter :)09/15/2014 - 10:08am
E. Zachary KnightNothing against Notch here. I think it is great that he made something so cool. I just can't understand how it is worth $2.5 bil09/15/2014 - 9:59am
InfophileWhat a world we live in: Becoming a billionaire was the easy way out for Notch.09/15/2014 - 9:42am
james_fudgelots of hate for Notch here. I don't get it. Sorry he made a game everyone loved. What a monster he is!09/15/2014 - 9:37am
SleakerOn the flipside, Notch has been a horrible CEO for Mojang, and the company has grown on sheer inertia, DESPITE being mishandled over and over.09/15/2014 - 9:33am
SleakerI can understand Notch's statements he made to Kotaku about growing bigger than he intended, and getting hate for EULA changes he didn't enact.09/15/2014 - 9:32am
MaskedPixelantehttp://pastebin.com/n1qTeikM Notch's statement about the MS acquisition. He wanted out for a long time and this was the easiest way.09/15/2014 - 9:08am
ConsterEh, I can't blame him.09/15/2014 - 9:01am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician