Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

November 15, 2011 -

Yesterday, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) launched its Mario Kills Tanooki campaign, a stunt meant to draw attention to the plight of the real-life tanooki that is apparently killed for its fur in some parts of the world.

Perhaps not so coincidentally, Super Mario 3D Land released the day before and one of Mario’s power-ups is the Tanooki suit (pictured).  Yeah, I’m sure you can see where this is going.

According to PETA, “[by] wearing Tanooki, Mario is sending the message that it's OK to wear fur.”  The organization even released a Flash game in which you play as a skinless tanooki chasing after Mario in an attempt to reclaim its hide.

Speaking to Eurogamer, Nintendo commented on PETA’s claim that Mario is pro-fur.

"Mario often takes the appearance of certain animals and objects in his games.  These have included a frog, a penguin, a balloon and even a metallic version of himself. These lighthearted and whimsical transformations give Mario different abilities and make his games fun to play.

The different forms that Mario takes make no statement beyond the games themselves."


Aww, that wasn’t as fun as Majesco’s response a few years ago when PETA parodied Cooking Mama to promote meat-free diets.  Come on, Nintendo.  Get Charles Martinet to record a message to PETA as Mario!

Source:           Eurogamer

-Reporting from San Diego, GamePolitics Contributing Editor Andrew Eisen

Posted in

Comments

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

I liked Kotaku's write-up on this, where they explain that in Japanese culture a tanooki is basically the equivalent of a lawn gnome.

And up until recently, I didn't even know it was based on a real animal lol

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

"Tanooki" is japanese for "raccoon." According to Shigeru Miyamoto, there's a japanese legend where a raccoon can put a leaf on it's head and turn into a statue. How it makes it fly, he didn't say. 

At any rate, I'm pretty sure PETA knows everyone's laughing at them now. So why we giving them the attention they're begging for? I'm talking to you, Nintendo.

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

I thought the BF3 rat was bad... I'm fully convinced now that PETA has NOTHING better to do with their time.

----
Papa Midnight

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

when have they ever shown interest in actually furthering their agenda over just fear mongering people and killing things so they can make more money by lieing about how it was done?

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

Um... The tanooki and even the frog powerups first came out in SMB3. It came out in 1989. Their complaint is a little late. About twenty-two YEARS too late. Nice try PETA. You are still a bunch of media whores, with no real voice. - W

Consumer responsibility is just as important as Corporate responsibility. So, be responsible consumers.

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

Nintendo: "Mario's tanooki suit is made of 100% fake fur. No tanooki's were harmed in the making of this game."

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

Hell, look at this article's pic.  That's official Nintendo art.  Mario's outfit isn't fur period, faux or otherwise.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

Nintendo: "PETA is mistaken. We can assure you that Mario does not use any real fur in his costumes. His costumes are made out of 100% Polygotton. Its a finer material than the old Pixwool he used to use before the 64-bit era."

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

Um PETA, I hate to tell you this, but THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH PEOPLE WEARING FUR!!!!

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

Not to defend PETA, but this is actually a debatable topic.  Fur farming is pretty gruesome, and if one accepts the idea that non-human animals can feel pain etc then it can be argued that supporting such an industry is unethical.

But that gets into the whole issue of the soul and other theological issues.

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

I wasn't aware anyone ever debated whether animals could feel pain.  Or course they can, it's how they know they've been injured.

Anyway, from an ethics standpoint, I'd say killing critters just for their fur is a no-no.  We're not cavemen anymore, we don't need animal pelts to survive.  Now, killing critters for something like food and then using their fur for material goods I think is fine.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

Fun history fact:  It used to be common belief that animals could not feel pain because they did not have souls.  Scientists found it interesting that animals would make sounds remarkably similar to human pain sounds during vivisections.

===============

Chris Kimberley

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

People wore fur centuries ago, long before PETA existed, and they'll continue now. What would you do if your precious "leaders" were attacked and killed by the very animals you're trying to "protect"?

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

they'd protest the killing of the "innocent animals" as soon as the cops shot them.

they've done it before when animals had mauled people to death and were in the process of attacking others (fine example is the incident in Connecticut with the chimp. the police shot it because it was attempting to break into their vehicle and get them)

these people actually value these animals lives over their own species, regardless of the situation.

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

I don't know, if the animals were mauling the Leaders of PeTA, I'd think it'd be kind of tough to find a cop that would want to shoot the animal.cheeky

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

It's a tanooki actually a creature of legend, actually spelled tanuki?

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

Haven't even bothered to Google this so just correct me if I'm wrong, but...

Assuming it is a creature of legend, and assuming (reasonably so I think) that it's a Japanese legend in question, then it's actually spelled in a completely different alphabet.  The only real reason to favour Tanooki or Tanuki is the exact pronunciation of the word.  As I recall the double vowel indicates that the vowel is actually held longer when spoken.

===============

Chris Kimberley

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

It is properly spelled Tanuki, not tanooki. Us stupid gaijin. :P

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

Nintendo spells it "tanooki."  That's good enough for me.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

Silly shit like this is why no one takes PETA seriously.

Well that and the fact they kill more animals than any animal shelter.

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

they kill more than they shelter, they use leather, and they PAY people to MURDER animals so they can make videos of it being done.

yep, they so want to help the critters they themselves kill for profit..

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Should 'Hatred' have been removed from Steam Greenlight?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
PHX Corp@Adam802 We'll break out the popcorn in June12/19/2014 - 9:23pm
ZippyDSMleeMaskedPixelante: I'm itching to start it too but I will wait till the patch goes live. >>12/19/2014 - 7:52pm
Adam802Leland Yee and Jackson get trial date: http://sfbay.ca/2014/12/18/leland-yee-keith-jackson-get-trial-date/12/19/2014 - 5:24pm
MaskedPixelanteNevermind. Turns out when they said "the patch is now live", they meant "it's still in beta".12/19/2014 - 5:07pm
MaskedPixelanteSo I bought Dark Souls PC, and it's forcing me to log into GFWL. Did I miss something?12/19/2014 - 5:00pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2014/12/republicans-may-have-plan-to-save-internet-providers-from-utility-rules/ this is intreasting. congress may put net nutrality in to law to avoid title 2 classification12/19/2014 - 2:45pm
Matthew Wilsonhttp://www.polygon.com/2014/12/19/7421953/bullshit-cards-against-humanity-donated-250k-sunlight-foundation I have to admit I like the choice o organization. congrats to CAH.12/19/2014 - 1:51pm
E. Zachary KnightIf you are downloading a copy in order to bypass the DRM, then you are legally in the wrong. Ethically, if you bought the game, it doesn't matter where you download it in the future.12/19/2014 - 12:06pm
InfophileEZK: Certainly better that way, though not foolproof. Makes me think though: does it count as piracy if you download a game you already paid for, just not from the place you paid for it at? Ethically, I'd say no, but legally, probably yes.12/19/2014 - 11:20am
ZippyDSMleeAnd I still spent 200$ in the last month on steam/GOG stuff sales get me nearly every time ><12/19/2014 - 10:55am
ZippyDSMleeMaskedPixelante:And this is why I'm a one legged bandit.12/19/2014 - 10:51am
ZippyDSMleeE. Zachary Knight: I buy what I can as long as I can get cracks for it...then again it I could have gotton Lords of the Fallen for 30 with DLC I would have ><12/19/2014 - 10:50am
MaskedPixelantehttp://www.joystiq.com/2014/12/19/marvel-vs-capcom-origins-leaving-online-storefronts-soon/ Speaking of "last chance to buy", Marvel vs. Capcom Origins is getting delisted from all major storefronts. Behold the wonders of the all digital future.12/19/2014 - 9:59am
MaskedPixelanteSeriously, the so-called "Last Chance" sale was up to 80% off, while this one time only return sale goes for a flat 85% off with a 90% off upgrade if you buy the whole catalogue.12/19/2014 - 9:37am
E. Zachary KnightInfophile, Tha is why I buy only DRM-free games.12/19/2014 - 9:37am
MaskedPixelanteNordic is back on GOG for one weekend only. And at 85% off no less, which is kind of a slap in the face to people who paid more during the "NORDIC IS LEAVING FOREVER BUY NOW OR FOREVER HOLD YOUR PEACE" sale, but whatever...12/19/2014 - 9:28am
InfophileRe PHX's link: This is one of the reasons the digital revolution isn't all it's cracked up to be. There's also the flip side where Sony can block access to games you've bought if they ban your account for unrelated reasons. All power is theirs.12/19/2014 - 8:52am
MaskedPixelantehttp://uplay.ubi.com/#!/en-US/events/uplay-15-days You can win FREE GAMES FOR A YEAR! Unfortunately, they're Ubisoft games.12/18/2014 - 6:29pm
Papa MidnightAh, so it was downtime. I've been seeing post appear in my RSS feed, but I was unable to access GamePolitics today across several ISPs.12/18/2014 - 6:06pm
james_fudgeSorry for the downtime today, folks.12/18/2014 - 5:54pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician