Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

November 15, 2011 -

Yesterday, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) launched its Mario Kills Tanooki campaign, a stunt meant to draw attention to the plight of the real-life tanooki that is apparently killed for its fur in some parts of the world.

Perhaps not so coincidentally, Super Mario 3D Land released the day before and one of Mario’s power-ups is the Tanooki suit (pictured).  Yeah, I’m sure you can see where this is going.

According to PETA, “[by] wearing Tanooki, Mario is sending the message that it's OK to wear fur.”  The organization even released a Flash game in which you play as a skinless tanooki chasing after Mario in an attempt to reclaim its hide.

Speaking to Eurogamer, Nintendo commented on PETA’s claim that Mario is pro-fur.

"Mario often takes the appearance of certain animals and objects in his games.  These have included a frog, a penguin, a balloon and even a metallic version of himself. These lighthearted and whimsical transformations give Mario different abilities and make his games fun to play.

The different forms that Mario takes make no statement beyond the games themselves."


Aww, that wasn’t as fun as Majesco’s response a few years ago when PETA parodied Cooking Mama to promote meat-free diets.  Come on, Nintendo.  Get Charles Martinet to record a message to PETA as Mario!

Source:           Eurogamer

-Reporting from San Diego, GamePolitics Contributing Editor Andrew Eisen

Posted in

Comments

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

I liked Kotaku's write-up on this, where they explain that in Japanese culture a tanooki is basically the equivalent of a lawn gnome.

And up until recently, I didn't even know it was based on a real animal lol

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

"Tanooki" is japanese for "raccoon." According to Shigeru Miyamoto, there's a japanese legend where a raccoon can put a leaf on it's head and turn into a statue. How it makes it fly, he didn't say. 

At any rate, I'm pretty sure PETA knows everyone's laughing at them now. So why we giving them the attention they're begging for? I'm talking to you, Nintendo.

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

I thought the BF3 rat was bad... I'm fully convinced now that PETA has NOTHING better to do with their time.

----
Papa Midnight

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

when have they ever shown interest in actually furthering their agenda over just fear mongering people and killing things so they can make more money by lieing about how it was done?

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

Um... The tanooki and even the frog powerups first came out in SMB3. It came out in 1989. Their complaint is a little late. About twenty-two YEARS too late. Nice try PETA. You are still a bunch of media whores, with no real voice. - W

Consumer responsibility is just as important as Corporate responsibility.

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

Nintendo: "Mario's tanooki suit is made of 100% fake fur. No tanooki's were harmed in the making of this game."

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

Hell, look at this article's pic.  That's official Nintendo art.  Mario's outfit isn't fur period, faux or otherwise.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

Nintendo: "PETA is mistaken. We can assure you that Mario does not use any real fur in his costumes. His costumes are made out of 100% Polygotton. Its a finer material than the old Pixwool he used to use before the 64-bit era."

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

Um PETA, I hate to tell you this, but THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH PEOPLE WEARING FUR!!!!

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

Not to defend PETA, but this is actually a debatable topic.  Fur farming is pretty gruesome, and if one accepts the idea that non-human animals can feel pain etc then it can be argued that supporting such an industry is unethical.

But that gets into the whole issue of the soul and other theological issues.

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

I wasn't aware anyone ever debated whether animals could feel pain.  Or course they can, it's how they know they've been injured.

Anyway, from an ethics standpoint, I'd say killing critters just for their fur is a no-no.  We're not cavemen anymore, we don't need animal pelts to survive.  Now, killing critters for something like food and then using their fur for material goods I think is fine.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

Fun history fact:  It used to be common belief that animals could not feel pain because they did not have souls.  Scientists found it interesting that animals would make sounds remarkably similar to human pain sounds during vivisections.

===============

Chris Kimberley

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

People wore fur centuries ago, long before PETA existed, and they'll continue now. What would you do if your precious "leaders" were attacked and killed by the very animals you're trying to "protect"?

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

they'd protest the killing of the "innocent animals" as soon as the cops shot them.

they've done it before when animals had mauled people to death and were in the process of attacking others (fine example is the incident in Connecticut with the chimp. the police shot it because it was attempting to break into their vehicle and get them)

these people actually value these animals lives over their own species, regardless of the situation.

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

I don't know, if the animals were mauling the Leaders of PeTA, I'd think it'd be kind of tough to find a cop that would want to shoot the animal.cheeky

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

It's a tanooki actually a creature of legend, actually spelled tanuki?

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

Haven't even bothered to Google this so just correct me if I'm wrong, but...

Assuming it is a creature of legend, and assuming (reasonably so I think) that it's a Japanese legend in question, then it's actually spelled in a completely different alphabet.  The only real reason to favour Tanooki or Tanuki is the exact pronunciation of the word.  As I recall the double vowel indicates that the vowel is actually held longer when spoken.

===============

Chris Kimberley

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

It is properly spelled Tanuki, not tanooki. Us stupid gaijin. :P

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

Nintendo spells it "tanooki."  That's good enough for me.

 

Andrew Eisen

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

Silly shit like this is why no one takes PETA seriously.

Well that and the fact they kill more animals than any animal shelter.

Re: Nintendo Responds to PETA's Pro-Fur Mario Claim

they kill more than they shelter, they use leather, and they PAY people to MURDER animals so they can make videos of it being done.

yep, they so want to help the critters they themselves kill for profit..

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Matthew Wilsonthe issue is when is doesn't work it can screw over millions in new york city's case. more often than not it is better to let the free market run its course without market distortion.04/16/2014 - 9:36am
NeenekoTrue, and overdone stagnation is a problem. It is a tricky balance. It does not help that when it does work, no one notices. Most people here have benifited from rent controls and not even realized it.04/16/2014 - 9:23am
ZippyDSMleehttp://www.afterdawn.com/news/article.cfm/2014/04/15/riaa_files_civil_suit_against_megaupload04/16/2014 - 8:48am
ZippyDSMleeEither way you get stagnation as people can not afford the prices they set.04/16/2014 - 8:47am
Neenekowell, specifically it helps people already living there and hurts people who want to live there instead. As for 'way more hurt', majorities generally need less legal protection. yes it hurt more people then it helped, it was written for a minority04/16/2014 - 8:30am
MaskedPixelantehttp://torrentfreak.com/square-enix-drm-boosts-profits-and-its-here-to-stay-140415/ Square proves how incredibly out of touch they are by saying that DRM is the way of the future, and is here to stay.04/16/2014 - 8:29am
james_fudgeUnwinnable Weekly Telethon playing Metal Gear http://www.twitch.tv/rainydayletsplay04/16/2014 - 8:06am
ConsterTo be fair, there's so little left of the middle class that those numbers are skewing.04/16/2014 - 7:42am
Matthew Wilsonyes it help a sub section of the poor, but hurt both the middle and upper class. in the end way more people were hurt than helped. also, it hurt most poor people as well.04/16/2014 - 12:13am
SeanBJust goes to show what I have said for years. Your ability to have sex does not qualify you for parenthood.04/15/2014 - 9:21pm
NeenekoSo "worked" vs "failed" really comes down to who you think is more important and deserving04/15/2014 - 7:04pm
NeenekoThough I am also not sure we can say NYC failed. Rent control helped the people it was intended for and is considered a failure by the people it was designed to protect them from.04/15/2014 - 7:04pm
NeenekoIf they change the rules, demand will plummet. Though yeah, rent control probably would not help much in the SF case. I doubt anything will.04/15/2014 - 1:35pm
TheSmokeyOnline gamer accused of murdering son to keep playing - http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Crime/2014/04/15/21604921.html04/15/2014 - 11:50am
Matthew Wilsonyup, but curent city rules do not allow for that.04/15/2014 - 11:00am
ZippyDSMleeIf SF dose not start building upwards then they will price people out of the aera.04/15/2014 - 10:59am
Matthew Wilsonthe issue rent control has it reduces supply, and in SF case they already has a supply problem. rent control ofen puts rent below cost, or below profit of selling it. rent control would not fix this issue.04/15/2014 - 10:56am
NeenekoRent control is useful in moderation, NYC took it way to far and tends to be held up as an example of them not working, but in most cases they are more subtle and positive.04/15/2014 - 10:24am
PHX CorpBeating Cancer with Video Games http://mashable.com/2014/04/14/steven-gonzalez-survivor-games/04/15/2014 - 9:21am
Matthew Wilsonwhat are you saying SF should do rent control, that has never worked every time it has been tried. the issue here is a self inflicted supply problem imposed by stupid laws.04/15/2014 - 8:52am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician