GameStop Sells 600K Elite Memberships

November 18, 2011 -

As part of its latest financial results games retailer GameStop revealed that it sold well over a half-a-million Call of Duty Elite subscriptions. The Call of Duty Elite subscriptions were a big hit at GameStop stores, mostly due to the November 8 launch of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3. Elite sales certainly helped GameStop's digital business, which the company expects to exceed internal expectations of $450 million for the current fiscal year. So exactly how many Elite subscriptions were sold? According to GameStop, right around 600,000.

"In the case of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3, we worked closely with Activision, Sony and Microsoft to pre-order and deliver nearly 600,000 instances of the Modern Warfare Elite DLC to date," said GameStop president Tony Bartel. "This places the launch of Elite as one of our top 10 launches of the year so far."

Elite subscribers get free monthly downloadable content, get to participate in competitions with prizes, get early access to new game features and other benefits for an annual fee of $50. Unfortunately, the service has proven to be hit-or-miss for most Elite subscribers. The service has been suffering from technical problems since launch and Activision is actively trying to fix it. They say the problems are being caused by an unexpected amount of subscribers.

As of this writing, Elite stability issues are still affecting the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3 users, with plans for a mobile app and a PC version.

Source: Gamasutra


Comments

Re: GameStop Sells 600K Elite Memberships

Like lambs being lead to the slaughter.

Re: GameStop Sells 600K Elite Memberships

A smart company making money on a worthwhile product their customers love. What a scam!

Re: GameStop Sells 600K Elite Memberships

I find this very depressing.  It's been successful, so now we're going to see copycats.  This is where developers will be focusing their attention.

Re: GameStop Sells 600K Elite Memberships

Wow!  At a rate of one per minute, that's more than 416 days worth of suckers!

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
WonderkarpGaming won 1st Ammendment Rights. Its Already Legit. Nobody can legislate against it. So just enjoy.11/24/2014 - 8:57pm
Wonderkarplike, in early nintendo power, they would write these little blurbs. Not really crapping on the game if its bad. Kinda hinting at it. I want people to play the games for themselves. One Persons Duck Tales is another Persons Festers Quest.11/24/2014 - 8:55pm
black mantaRight. "Leave us alone to let us play our video games devoid of of deeper analysis and influence. They're just playthings." You do realize how damaging that is; potentially undoing everything we in the ECA have fought for to legitimize gaming?11/24/2014 - 8:50pm
Andrew EisenI have no idea what that means but hey, good luck with that and post a link when it's ready for prime time.11/24/2014 - 8:49pm
Wonderkarpno editorials unless absolutly necessary, no scored reviews. Reviews are going to be ambiguous ala classic Nintendo Power11/24/2014 - 8:47pm
WonderkarpI decided I'm going to pull the trigger on my website I've been working on. Getting some people together. I want to make a Gaming News Site that only cares about the Games.11/24/2014 - 8:46pm
Matthew Wilsonin the end, I dont think its a big deal.11/24/2014 - 8:44pm
WonderkarpRight, I'm not going to argue with Black Manta. I've already argued once today on the Internet. Thats one time too many. Anybody hear about the Star Wars Spinoff news?11/24/2014 - 8:43pm
black mantaIf it's imprtant at all.11/24/2014 - 8:43pm
black mantaI'm with Andrew. I fail to see how this really improves anything. The importance of this is overstated.11/24/2014 - 8:42pm
Matthew Wilsonit should be obvious what those links are, but more transparency is never a bad thing in my eyes.11/24/2014 - 8:42pm
Wonderkarpyeah.11/24/2014 - 8:41pm
black mantaAll I see is GG ruining everything it touches in the name of some misguided and twisted notion of "ethics."11/24/2014 - 8:41pm
Andrew EisenWell, unless this was something the FTC was already working on. And still, it remains to be seen what its guideline updates actually say.11/24/2014 - 8:40pm
Wonderkarpand other media I suppose11/24/2014 - 8:39pm
WonderkarpI repeat, Its concidered a victory because, if its true, then it shows they are causing change in (Changes) Journalistic Practices in Games Media.11/24/2014 - 8:38pm
Wonderkarpits not the easiest "Ethical Issue" to discuss. Its more trivial. I'm playing devils advocate on this one.11/24/2014 - 8:36pm
black mantaEthics in what? Advertising? All you're doing is needlessly complicating things. There's no "victory" in that.11/24/2014 - 8:35pm
WonderkarpIts just a article's title. Its concidered a victory because, if its true, then it shows they are causing change in ethics. We were discussing those ethics11/24/2014 - 8:33pm
Andrew EisenNot knowing what cards a retailer accepts beforehand can be a headache. Not knowing the site you came from to purchase a good gets a small percentage of the sale? I'm not seeing it.11/24/2014 - 8:32pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician