Slay a Dragon for Ron Paul

December 16, 2011 -

Alex Beltramo, the lead developer of the web-based online game Dungeoneers, says that he's been quietly working on his game for years, and planned to keep it under wraps until it was finished but something came up: the presidential campaign. Beltramo believes strongly in Republican presidential candidate Ron Paul - so much so that he has pledged to give the candidate money the first time a player slays a dragon in his game. The game, for the record - is currently free. Here's Beltramo, in his own words:

"After years of crafting, our game Dungeoneers is now available for public testing. I had been planning to keep it under wraps a bit longer, but something came up…

What came up is that presidential candidate Ron Paul has a good chance to win the Republican nomination for President. And because he does not have big corporate backers, his supporters must find creative ways to promote him.

With the 'Slay a Dragon for Ron Paul' campaign, I can support both my game and Dr. Paul. When a player kills a dragon for the first time, if they agree, I will personally contribute $5 to the grassroots Super Brochure campaign for Ron Paul. My goal is that we find 5,000 Ron Paul dragon slayers so that I can contribute $25,000.

I support Ron Paul because he consistently and honestly adheres to America's core principles. He champions a constitutional government that does not wage endless wars, that does not recklessly print money, and that does not undermine our economy with intervention and corporate favoritism.

America is awakening to Ron Paul's message of liberty, financial responsibility, and peace. I am excited to have an opportunity to help. Now, please, go slay a dragon."

According to Balmeo, players of his game have raised $7500 for Paul's campaign, which means about 1500 dragons have been slain. Whatever you think of the candidate, Beltramo's method for raising money is certainly unique. You can check out the game here.


Comments

Re: Slay a Dragon for Ron Paul

Giving that I've heard Paul wants to deregulate absolutely everything, I think I'll let the world burn.

Re: Slay a Dragon for Ron Paul

Ron Paul doesn't want to deregulate everything.

Here are some examples of areas where regulation would be acceptable:

1) If that regulation is absolutely needed to protect life liberty and property

2) If that regulation is allowed under the limited powers granted the federal government by the Constitution.

I don't think those limitations are at all unreasonable.

Re: Slay a Dragon for Ron Paul

The devil is in the details.  While it is true he does not want an absolute removal of government power, it is fair to say he wants most things deregulated and pretty much stick to criminal code..

And of course he wants regulation to meet his idea about what protects life/liberty/property and what powers the government has.  I think it is that former one that tends to rub people the wrong way since he wants very limited protections, essentially stopping the government from protecting the weak from the strong, and that people with private power should be able to exercise it against their fellow citizens without government interference.

So true, in the abstract, not unreasonable... but his specific definitions make a lot of people uncomfortable since, while he has a very solid group of followers, they do not represent how most of the country feels.

Re: Slay a Dragon for Ron Paul

Now this is an interesting way to donate. Ron Paul is the only hope for the Country. DL'ing this game now so I can help contribute more to Dr. Paul's campaign. Let's all pray that he gets into office so this Country can be put on the right track yet again.

Re: Slay a Dragon for Ron Paul

Yeah.. the country used to be on that track, it produced some very rosy aggregate numbers, but really sucked for the vast majority of people, which is why we stopped doing a lot of the things he is in favor of.

Those policies had their chance, they didn't work.

Re: Slay a Dragon for Ron Paul

Policies like the Constitution?

When have we ever followed it?

If you dont support the constitution then leave the country because that is what this country is about.

Ron Paul whats to legalize drugs because he feels we dont need the cops telling us what we cant  put in our own body. He will stop us from going in to another war and he will let gays marry. All that is protected by the constitution and he will up hold it.

If you dont vote for him then the jails will be full of people that have done nothing to hurt anyone and many will die in iran for the next war.

Re: Slay a Dragon for Ron Paul

Agreed 100% Bluelightrevival. Neekeno: The Country used to be a powerhouse in the industrial and commercial sector, then the Government started to regulate it up the bunghole. How would you like it if you wanted to start a Soda company, but the Government says that you can't use certain ingredients and the ingredients you CAN use, you have to mix a certain way. And in order for you to stay open, you must pay the Government to inspect you to make sure that you're doing as you're told. That's the reason why so many companies in the US left for China. With most of our manufacturing taking jobs from hard working US Citizens and giving it to the Chinese, our economy tanked. What made us the most economic nation in the early part of the 20th Century? The fact that we were able to make stuff and sell it overseas. Ron Paul wants us to be like that again, and he's our only hope to go back to that. And how the frak am I able to put breaks in my posts? Can anyone help me with this?

Re: Slay a Dragon for Ron Paul

Regulation is only a very small cost compared to the real reason why jobs go overseas: labor costs and taxes.   

And I appreciate that the US tells your soda company that they can't put mercury in my soda, or melamine in my baby formula.

Re: Slay a Dragon for Ron Paul

That really depends on what ingredients/mixtures are being regulated and their effects on people.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Did Microsoft pay too much ($2.5 billion) for Minecraft developer Mojang?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Craig R.tldr: I'm a gamer, and imo those who support GamerGate should feel free to take a flying leap off a cliff.09/20/2014 - 1:27pm
Craig R.Not only that, I'm pretty sure that if actual studies were done, you'd still deny them, Sleaker. After all, it's not what you'd want to hear to support your rose-colored view of GamerGate.09/20/2014 - 1:18pm
Craig R.There IS an issue. Nor do we need a study to show that if you deny it then you're part of the problem.09/20/2014 - 1:17pm
Sleakersimply oust people that do harass others.09/20/2014 - 11:34am
Sleaker@Conster - I can say the same thing if you think there's been more than a handful. Until there's an actual study on rates no one can claim to know how widespread the incidence of harassment is. Thus the best we can do is 'there might be an issue' and...09/20/2014 - 11:33am
ConsterSleaker: if you think there's only been "a handful of" incidents, you have your head stuck *somewhere* - I'm assuming it's sand.09/20/2014 - 5:38am
prh99Most of it's agitprop clickbait anyway.09/20/2014 - 5:27am
prh99A good reason to stop reading reguardless of view pointhttp://www.theguardian.com/media/2013/apr/12/news-is-bad-rolf-dobelli.09/20/2014 - 5:22am
Andrew EisenWell this is unique! A musical critique of the Factual Feminist's "Are Video Games Sexist?" video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-K4s7cV4Us409/20/2014 - 2:41am
Andrew EisenSome locked threads. Some let them be. So, no, I'm not seeing a problem here. No corruption. No collusion. No ethical problem with privately discussing ethics.09/20/2014 - 12:48am
Andrew EisenAnd still, in the end, Tito made up his own mind on how to handle his site. All 150 or so members went off to handle their own sites in their own ways. Some talked about it. Some didn't. Some changed disclosure policies. Some didn't.09/20/2014 - 12:40am
Andrew EisenThere were two comments other than Kochera and Tito's. One pointed out the Escapist Code of Conduct, another comment was in support of Tito.09/20/2014 - 12:40am
Andrew EisenKochera privately expressed his disagreement on how Tito decided to do something. No, I don't consider that crossing a line nor do I consider the exchange an example of the group pressuring him.09/20/2014 - 12:36am
Kronotechnical reasons. Anyways, I need to get to sleep as well.09/20/2014 - 12:29am
KronoAnd he wasn't the only one pushing Tito to censor the thread. If Tito had bowed to peer pressure, we likely wouldn't have gotten this http://goo.gl/vKiYtR which grew out of that thread. Said thread also lasted until a new one needed to be made for09/20/2014 - 12:28am
Krono@Andrew So it's an example of Kuchera crossing the line from reporter to advocate. And an example of the group pressuring for censorship.09/20/2014 - 12:21am
E. Zachary KnightAnyway, I am off to bed. I will probably wake up to all of this being knocked off the shout box.09/20/2014 - 12:20am
E. Zachary KnightKrono, that is the type of reading too much into things that bugs me. Ben did no such thing. Greg had the last word in that part of the exchange. The rest was about how to approach the story and Quinn.09/20/2014 - 12:19am
Andrew EisenSo?09/20/2014 - 12:13am
KronoExcept that the forum thread wasn't harassment, and Kuchera continued to push for the thread's removal after Tito made it clear he didn't consider it harassment.09/20/2014 - 12:12am
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician