GoDaddy Continues to Suffer for SOPA Support

December 27, 2011 -

GoDaddy is not having a merry Christmas, and the way things have started out this week, its New Year's celebration will be punctuated with audible sobbing. A lot has happened to the company since last Friday. The first notable thing, according to VentureBeat, is that it has lost 37,000 domains - mostly the result of boycott efforts after the company was revealed on a list of companies that support SOPA. The company said last week in a very public statement that it no longer supported SOPA, but this week it was revealed that much of that was simply damage control to stop the exodus of customers. The truth is the company still supports SOPA. Here's an excerpt from a TechCrunch story pointed out by a Reddit user:

"[GoDaddy CEO] Adelman couldn’t commit to changing its position on the record in Congress when asked about that, but said 'I’ll take that back to our legislative guys, but I agree that’s an important step.' But when pressed, he said 'We’re going to step back and let others take leadership roles.' He felt that the public statement removing their support would be sufficient for now, though further steps would be considered."

To add even more fuel to the fire, a competing company called Namecheap is going after GoDaddy's customers by publishing its own stance on SOPA. Richard Kirkendall, Namecheap CEO, made the following statement last week:

"While we at Namecheap firmly believe in intellectual rights, SOPA is like detonating a nuclear bomb on the internet when only a surgical strike is necessary. This legislation has the potential to harm the way everyone uses the Internet and to undermine the system itself. At Namecheap, we believe having a free and open Internet is the only option that will continue the legacy of innovation and openness that stands for everything we all value in our modern society."

Namecheap also claims GoDaddy is not transferring the domains of those customers who have left their service, an accusation the company claims is not true. Some customers have said that they are "stuck in limbo" while they wait for GoDaddy to transfer their domains to new services, but GoDaddy says that companies such as Namecheap have not contacted them about the transfers - which is typically the way this sort of thing works when you move your web presence elsewhere.

Finally, Boing Boing points out the plight of David Rusenko, co-founder of website hosting service Weebly.com. He describes how GoDaddy wiped his domain name records after only one complaint. The point of their story is that even before something like SOPA is in place, the company bends over backwards to listen to a complaint from an outside source and treats a customer badly:

"They had received a complaint about the content of a site, and that they were removing the DNS entries for weebly.com because of it. I asked him if they had contacted us previously -- he responded that they hadn't. The site in question featured a bad review of a local business, and that business had complained."

Rusenko immediately removed the domain from GoDaddy to prevent something like that from happening again.


Comments

Re: GoDaddy Continues to Suffer for SOPA Support

Also, anyone switching should make sure not to go with one of the other GoDaddy companies registered under different names. The reddit thread can help you find them.

Re: GoDaddy Continues to Suffer for SOPA Support

I've seen more than one retweet on Twitter of folks saying that GoDaddy is requiring 'written confirmation' to transfer a domain. I'm not entirely sure what that would entail.

Re: GoDaddy Continues to Suffer for SOPA Support

Nah. There was nothing like that.

I had to go through a little process of unlocking my domains and requesting transfer authorization codes. Then I put the transfer request through my new registrar. An email was sent from my new registrar to authenticate the transfer. A request was then sent from my new registrar to Godaddy. Godaddy sent me an email telling me that the transfer was authorized. I then logged into my account and finalized the transfer. Took me all of an hour. Probably would have taken me longer if I had more domains.

 

Re: GoDaddy Continues to Suffer for SOPA Support

I've only had to transfer my domain once, several years ago. I recall the process being something like what you describe.

You said on your blog that you moved your domain to the same company as your hosting. It's a little late now, but I would recommend keeping them separate in case of a problem. I've had no problems with my registrar, but I've changed hosting a couple of times over the years.

Re: GoDaddy Continues to Suffer for SOPA Support

This just a guess, but it likely means they're requiring people to jump through numerous hoops in order to leave their service.

 

Again, just a guess.

Re: GoDaddy Continues to Suffer for SOPA Support

It is my opinion that Godaddy has become toxic. It has proven with this little fiasco that it cannot be trusted with anyone's domains. That is why I have chosen to no longer have my domains registered with them.

http://ezknight.net/?p=238

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Will an M rating hurt Batman: Arkham Knight's sales?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
ZippyDSMleeEh still rather subjective… the haters would be better off going after teen and beauty rags and magazines than fiction, fiction follows reality and going after fiction tends to turn into a bullying fest’s… plus its fiction its unrealistic to start with….02/27/2015 - 1:10am
MechaTama31That's a pretty difficult anatomy to break.02/26/2015 - 11:09pm
MechaTama31"the way her animations repeatedly break her anatomy" <-- I'm sorry, but we are talking here about the woman who can roll up into a little ball and live to tell the tale, yes? ;)02/26/2015 - 11:09pm
Andrew EisenAs far as examples that could be culled from female game characters though, that one's pretty mild.02/26/2015 - 9:11pm
Andrew EisenNot as much the heels or the suit in and of themselves but certainly the way her animations repeatedly break her anatomy to show off her lady bits.02/26/2015 - 9:10pm
E. Zachary KnightWell, Samus's heels are certainly impracticable, but I wouldn't really call her Zero suit objectified. I don't really feel that the new Lara Croft is objectified either, but that is my subjective opinion.02/26/2015 - 9:08pm
Andrew EisenTomb Raider: No but we haven't seen much of anything yet. Samus: Yes.02/26/2015 - 9:07pm
ZippyDSMleeWould you call the new tomb raider objectified? WOuld Samus Aran from the new Smash bros be objectified?02/26/2015 - 9:02pm
WonderkarpI'm hoping they put the rest of the comic book ghostbusters in there. Ortiz and Rookie(From GB the game)02/26/2015 - 8:38pm
Wonderkarpghostbusters board game is doing great. getting close too a 3rd extra playable Character. Ron Alexander.02/26/2015 - 8:37pm
Andrew EisenSmurfette is not subjective. If there's more than one female character, it's not Smurfette. Anyway, as with everything on the list, Smurfette is, in and of itself, not necessarily a bad thing.02/26/2015 - 8:32pm
Andrew EisenI think there's 5 women (out of 15, I think) but other than one being a bit more "hippy" than the others, they pretty much all have the same body type. Especially when compaired to the huge variety of male body types.02/26/2015 - 8:31pm
Wonderkarpso I dont see Smurfette as a bad thing. Unless like all your female characters are Smurfette. remember the Smurfs also had Sassette02/26/2015 - 8:29pm
E. Zachary KnightOne good example of the larger issues is one Anita used in the presentation, Blizzard's Overwatch game. There are a dozen men in the game with a dozen body types. But there are only 4 women with 2 body types, but 3 of them have the same one.02/26/2015 - 8:28pm
Wonderkarpthe smurfette thing is subjective to how many female characters you have. Take Sonic for example. You have Amy, who is obvious smurfette, but there's several other female characters now without that. Including the original animated seriescomics with Sally02/26/2015 - 8:28pm
E. Zachary KnightAE. Very true. I think that is where I was going, but it didn't come out right. Jack Harkness is sexy but not objectified. Whereas, a women would have to be objectified in order to be "sexy" in most games.02/26/2015 - 8:26pm
E. Zachary KnightAnd as Andrew pointed out, there is a big difference between a sexualized man, and an idealized man. But for some reason, there is no distinction between women in games. For the most part.02/26/2015 - 8:25pm
Andrew EisenI think one of the issues we run into repeatedly with these conversations is the confusion over "sexy" and "sexually objectified."02/26/2015 - 8:24pm
E. Zachary KnightYet, for some reason, in orde rto have a sexualized women, she must be wearing lingerie or a bikini. Can't women be sexual and still dress for the job at hand?02/26/2015 - 8:24pm
E. Zachary KnightThe problem I have with complaints of "sexualized men" is that men don't have to wear speedos to be sexualized. Captain Jack Harkness from Torchwood/Doctor Who, was one sexy man, but he spent 99% of his time in a WW2 soldier's trenchcoat.02/26/2015 - 8:23pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician