GoDaddy Continues to Suffer for SOPA Support

December 27, 2011 -

GoDaddy is not having a merry Christmas, and the way things have started out this week, its New Year's celebration will be punctuated with audible sobbing. A lot has happened to the company since last Friday. The first notable thing, according to VentureBeat, is that it has lost 37,000 domains - mostly the result of boycott efforts after the company was revealed on a list of companies that support SOPA. The company said last week in a very public statement that it no longer supported SOPA, but this week it was revealed that much of that was simply damage control to stop the exodus of customers. The truth is the company still supports SOPA. Here's an excerpt from a TechCrunch story pointed out by a Reddit user:

"[GoDaddy CEO] Adelman couldn’t commit to changing its position on the record in Congress when asked about that, but said 'I’ll take that back to our legislative guys, but I agree that’s an important step.' But when pressed, he said 'We’re going to step back and let others take leadership roles.' He felt that the public statement removing their support would be sufficient for now, though further steps would be considered."

To add even more fuel to the fire, a competing company called Namecheap is going after GoDaddy's customers by publishing its own stance on SOPA. Richard Kirkendall, Namecheap CEO, made the following statement last week:

"While we at Namecheap firmly believe in intellectual rights, SOPA is like detonating a nuclear bomb on the internet when only a surgical strike is necessary. This legislation has the potential to harm the way everyone uses the Internet and to undermine the system itself. At Namecheap, we believe having a free and open Internet is the only option that will continue the legacy of innovation and openness that stands for everything we all value in our modern society."

Namecheap also claims GoDaddy is not transferring the domains of those customers who have left their service, an accusation the company claims is not true. Some customers have said that they are "stuck in limbo" while they wait for GoDaddy to transfer their domains to new services, but GoDaddy says that companies such as Namecheap have not contacted them about the transfers - which is typically the way this sort of thing works when you move your web presence elsewhere.

Finally, Boing Boing points out the plight of David Rusenko, co-founder of website hosting service Weebly.com. He describes how GoDaddy wiped his domain name records after only one complaint. The point of their story is that even before something like SOPA is in place, the company bends over backwards to listen to a complaint from an outside source and treats a customer badly:

"They had received a complaint about the content of a site, and that they were removing the DNS entries for weebly.com because of it. I asked him if they had contacted us previously -- he responded that they hadn't. The site in question featured a bad review of a local business, and that business had complained."

Rusenko immediately removed the domain from GoDaddy to prevent something like that from happening again.


Comments

Re: GoDaddy Continues to Suffer for SOPA Support

Also, anyone switching should make sure not to go with one of the other GoDaddy companies registered under different names. The reddit thread can help you find them.

Re: GoDaddy Continues to Suffer for SOPA Support

I've seen more than one retweet on Twitter of folks saying that GoDaddy is requiring 'written confirmation' to transfer a domain. I'm not entirely sure what that would entail.

Re: GoDaddy Continues to Suffer for SOPA Support

Nah. There was nothing like that.

I had to go through a little process of unlocking my domains and requesting transfer authorization codes. Then I put the transfer request through my new registrar. An email was sent from my new registrar to authenticate the transfer. A request was then sent from my new registrar to Godaddy. Godaddy sent me an email telling me that the transfer was authorized. I then logged into my account and finalized the transfer. Took me all of an hour. Probably would have taken me longer if I had more domains.

 

Re: GoDaddy Continues to Suffer for SOPA Support

I've only had to transfer my domain once, several years ago. I recall the process being something like what you describe.

You said on your blog that you moved your domain to the same company as your hosting. It's a little late now, but I would recommend keeping them separate in case of a problem. I've had no problems with my registrar, but I've changed hosting a couple of times over the years.

Re: GoDaddy Continues to Suffer for SOPA Support

This just a guess, but it likely means they're requiring people to jump through numerous hoops in order to leave their service.

 

Again, just a guess.

Re: GoDaddy Continues to Suffer for SOPA Support

It is my opinion that Godaddy has become toxic. It has proven with this little fiasco that it cannot be trusted with anyone's domains. That is why I have chosen to no longer have my domains registered with them.

http://ezknight.net/?p=238

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

Will Target Australia sell the next GTA game upon its release?:

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Mattsworknameso basicly, sargon showed that the whole spat of "Gamers are dead" article were based on lies and misinformation07/31/2015 - 6:39pm
Mattsworknamehow the articles themselves were not truly academic based, but agenda driven, as it they exsisted for idealogical purposes not backed up by the research they claimed supported them.07/31/2015 - 6:37pm
Mattsworknamegeneral, have no need or want of "Diveristy" according to shaws own research. He then went into the articles that cited it, including the origional, and showed that they argued things taht the actual research tthey quoted did NOT support, he lastly showed07/31/2015 - 6:36pm
MattsworknameAndrew: Sorry im so late in responding to your earlier question abonut sargons video, but basicly, he went through 3 phases. He first looked at the cited reasearch the articles used, by somone named shaw, and proved that the research shows that gamers, in07/31/2015 - 6:35pm
benohawk:( Well, that's crappy news James07/31/2015 - 6:29pm
james_fudgeRIP Roddy Piper :(07/31/2015 - 5:39pm
Andrew EisenI told Sega if it releases Yakuza 1&2 HD and Yakuza 5 in North America, I'll buy them. So far, they don't seem to be swayed.07/31/2015 - 5:11pm
Craig R.Too many gamers were harassing and abusing long before Baldwin decided to 'legitimize' the lunatic fringe, but that term certainly made the lunatics easier to pick out of the crowd07/31/2015 - 4:58pm
Craig R.Which is why the entire GG crowd looks like a giant bad egg07/31/2015 - 4:55pm
Craig R.Irony: the people who are feeling hostility toward their 'gamer' identity are often those who are most hostile to everybody else07/31/2015 - 4:55pm
Andrew EisenIt's not about gamers at all, it's discussing the harassment and abuse that Sarkeesian and Quinn had suffered. So yeah, not a great title but not an attack on gamers either.07/31/2015 - 4:48pm
Andrew EisenI agree than many of the titles are kinda bunk though. For example, Ars Technia's "The death of the 'gamers' and the women who 'killed' them" doesn't really work for the article.07/31/2015 - 4:47pm
Andrew EisenAnd I still don't see how articles like Polygon's "An awful week to care about video games" can be construed as an attack.07/31/2015 - 4:25pm
Andrew Eisen18 total? I've seen several lists and the total has never been above 14. The most popular collection seems to be 9 on Aug. 28 then three more on Aug. 29, Sep. 2 and Sep. 3.07/31/2015 - 4:24pm
Infophile@Goth_Skunk: Your distaste for TMS is noted and given exactly the respect it deserves. The fact that you don't like a site doesn't mean they can't be right. In the linked article, they are.07/31/2015 - 4:06pm
Goth_SkunkAnd the worst volleys are the ones being fired by the kind of people who should be standing up and saying 'Hey! This isn't cool! Stop that!'07/31/2015 - 4:05pm
Goth_SkunkNow let's come full circle: One such confrontationally titled article is easy to dismiss. Within a day, nine similarly titled articles are written. Within 4 more days, nine more articles are written. This can't be ignored. This is a blatant attack.07/31/2015 - 4:04pm
Andrew EisenAnd that's totally fine. I too often skip articles and videos based solely on an unappealing title.07/31/2015 - 3:56pm
Goth_SkunkPersonally, I would not waste time reading an article with such a blatantly confrontational title.07/31/2015 - 3:52pm
Andrew EisenGoth - Depends on how the article was written and what it actually said.07/31/2015 - 3:49pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician