Silicon Knights Loses Key Witness in Epic Legal Fight

December 29, 2011

Silicon Knights has suffered a major setback in its ongoing legal battle with Epic Games over its Unreal Engine 3 licensing dispute. A judge has granted Epic a motion to exclude an expert witness's testimony and reports that were considered key to SK's case.

The witness in question was financial analyst and accountant Terry Lloyd, who argued on SK's behalf that problems with Epic's Unreal Engine 3 licensing and functionality caused more than $58 million in damages to Silicon Knights.

Ontario-based Silicon Knights brought in Lloyd to offer an expert opinion on damages caused by issues with Unreal Engine 3, which the developer claims caused a two-year delay and low sales of its 2008 game Too Human for Xbox 360.

SK filed a lawsuit in 2007 alleging that Epic failed to provide a functional version of Unreal Engine 3 because it was too busy developing technology for Gears of War. Epic filed a countersuit at the time denying that it promised to deliver a "fully-operational version" of the engine within six months of the Xbox 360's launch.

Silicon Knights further claimed that during the license-agreement negotiations, Epic made false representations concerning the license agreement and the functionality of UE3. It also claimed that the deal "caused decreased sales of Too Human, caused [publisher] Microsoft to end negotiations to develop two sequels... damaged Silicon Knights reputation, and impaired Silicon Knights' ability to secure future development projects."

In opposing Lloyd, Epic described him as unqualified and filed a motion to exclude his testimony. Further, they called his estimates "unreliable," "speculative," "made up," and "uninformative guesses."

North Carolina chief district judge James Dever III agreed, taking issue with how Lloyd calculated potential sales for Too Human, and the value of the rejected projects Silicon Knights was negotiating with publishers such as Capcom, THQ, Vivendi, Namco, and Sega.

Source: Gamasutra

Posted in

Comments

Re: Silicon Knights Loses Key Witness in Epic Legal Fight

They should just make a sequel to Eternal Darkness and call it a day. Maybe even throw in some gimmicky 3D or Kinect crap.

Re: Silicon Knights Loses Key Witness in Epic Legal Fight

Don't you mean a good sequel? Or hell, tweak the graphics and release it again.

Re: Silicon Knights Loses Key Witness in Epic Legal Fight

Too bad SK isn't addressing the true reason for their troubles: The man-child called Denis Dyack, who seems to be incapable of shouldering any responsibility for anything.  He also may very well be insane.

What is their excuse for X-Men?

Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
ddrfr33kGood to hear, Zip! Welcome back05/25/2012 - 7:26pm
ZippyDSMleeComp seems fixed YAY!!!!05/25/2012 - 6:17pm
E. Zachary KnightGamasutra explores the failure of Streetfighter X Tekken and has one of the best arguments against on-disk DLC I have ever read: http://tinyurl.com/d399ylu05/25/2012 - 1:46pm
ddrfr33kabout the xbox live hacks from last year, now we know: http://kotaku.com/5913228/report-how-scammers-are-stealing-xbox-live-accounts-and-what-they-do-with-them05/25/2012 - 12:31pm
tallimarhttp://news.cnet.com/8301-1035_3-57440902-94/microsoft-legal-win-over-google-may-signal-ceasefire/05/24/2012 - 10:17pm
ZippyDSMleeTIme or an operation!05/24/2012 - 6:43pm
ZippyDSMleePC parts are in wish me luck or hell!!05/24/2012 - 6:43pm
MaskedPixelante38 Studios and Big Huge Games are pretty much dead now. http://www.joystiq.com/2012/05/24/38-studios-and-big-huge-games-lay-off-entire-staffs05/24/2012 - 4:39pm
DorthLousActually, nop, I did miss the emoticon for some reason (getting used to pics?) and I didn't know you changed it since (since I posted previous to my shout and it was still there.) Anyhow, thanks for taking it out!05/23/2012 - 6:01pm
james_fudgeWell we were just testing it. but it is still on the submission to fight $pam.05/23/2012 - 5:48pm
E. Zachary KnightJames, No I don't have it. I was just wondering who does and why. More curiosity than anything.05/23/2012 - 5:38pm
james_fudgeDid you not see the emoticon and did you not see that it has already been changed back?05/23/2012 - 5:10pm
james_fudgeLOL05/23/2012 - 5:07pm
DorthLousWhy? Not shocked that people are barking to an additional hoop to jump through when posting from their already logged in account or just mentionning this to try to paint me as one always complaining?05/23/2012 - 4:45pm
james_fudgebig shock there ;)05/23/2012 - 4:30pm
DorthLousI'll add my voice to those wanting it gone :S I'm already logged in, I don't need a captch'a. That's for those registering.05/23/2012 - 3:54pm
james_fudgeEt tu EZK?!?05/23/2012 - 3:51pm
Craig R.I'm a One Man Quorum! And it's working for me now, thanks. :)05/23/2012 - 3:48pm
E. Zachary KnightHow do we determine who get's the game/captcha thingy? Is there a certain posting threshhold users have to meet before it is turned off?05/23/2012 - 2:25pm
james_fudgeGive it a chance, we're still adjusting it ;)05/23/2012 - 11:20am

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician