Thirty-Four Organizations Sign on to Letter Urging White House to Oppose CISPA

March 20, 2013 -

A letter signed by 34 different organizations has been sent to the White House this week urging President Barack Obama to veto Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA) if it crossed his desk this year. Last year the President promised to reject the House bill if it was not drastically overhauled to provide more privacy protections and remove some other elements like immunity from litigation for corporations that share information with the government.

The letter was signed by 34 organizations including the Entertainment Consumers Association, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, Center for Democracy & Technology, Demand Progress, Reddit, DailyKOS, Fight for the Future, American Library Association, the ACLU, and many others.

Reiterating what the White House said last year, the letter urges the Administration to follow through on its promise - mainly because the bill that was reintroduced this year has not changed at all:

"Because the flaws that prompted the veto threat have not been fixed, we urge the White House to make clear to Congress it still opposes CISPA."

You can read the letter below:

March 19, 2013
To Michael Daniel, White House Cybersecurity Coordinator:
We the undersigned organizations write to encourage the White House to renew its promise to veto the Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA). Last year, the White House threatened to veto CISPA (H.R. 3523) on the grounds that the bill would create major privacy and security vulnerabilities. This year, CISPA has been reintroduced (H.R. 624) with the same flaws.

In its veto threat, the White House stated: “The sharing of information must be conducted in a manner that preserves Americans' privacy, data confidentiality, and civil liberties and recognizes the civilian nature of cyberspace. Cybersecurity and privacy are not mutually exclusive.”

Specifically, the White House objected that CISPA did not require companies or the government to “minimize and protect personally identifiable information” (PII): “[H.R. 3523 repeals] important provisions of electronic surveillance law without instituting corresponding privacy, confidentiality, and civil liberties safeguards. For example, the bill would allow broad sharing of information with governmental entities without establishing requirements for both industry and the Government to minimize and protect personally identifiable information.”

The White House noted that CISPA would provide companies dangerously broad legal immunity for actions they took based on information “identified, obtained, or shared” under the bill:

“H.R. 3523 would inappropriately shield companies from any suits where a company's actions are based on cyber threat information identified, obtained, or shared under this bill, regardless of whether that action otherwise violated Federal criminal law or results in damage or loss of life. This broad liability protection not only removes a strong incentive to improving cybersecurity, it also potentially undermines our Nation's economic, national security, and public safety interests.”

The White House also pointed to the significant threat CISPA poses to the civilian nature of the Internet, a vital aspect of a free and open Internet:
“H.R. 3523 effectively treats domestic cybersecurity as an intelligence activity and thus, significantly departs from longstanding efforts to treat the Internet and cyberspace as civilian spheres.”

Because the flaws that prompted the veto threat have not been fixed, we urge the White House to make clear to Congress it still opposes CISPA.

Sincerely,

Access
ACLU
Advocacy for Principled Action in Government
American Association of Law Libraries
American Library Association
Association of Research Libraries
Bill of Rights Defense Committee
CALPIRG
Center for Democracy & Technology
Center for Digital Democracy
Center for Financial Privacy and Human Rights
Competitive Enterprise Institute
The Constitution Project
Cosumer Watchdog
Daily Kos
Demand Progress
DownsizeDC.org, Inc.
DuckDuckGo
Electronic Frontier Foundation
Entertainment Consumers Association
Fight for the Future
Free Press Action Fund
Gandi
Government Accountability Project
Liberty Coalition
National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
New America Foundation’s Open Technology Institute
NY Tech Meetup
OpenMedia
Personal Democracy Media
Politihacks
Privacy Rights Clearinghouse
Reddit
TechFreedom

[Full Disclosure: GamePolitics is an ECA publication.]


Comments

Re: Thirty-Four Organizations Sign on to Letter Urging White ...

I believe it may be time for another blackout.

----
Papa Midnight

Re: Thirty-Four Organizations Sign on to Letter Urging White ...

I'm fine with that.  Bring on the blackouts.  Actually, what would be awesome is to just black out everyone's access to key Internet resources for 24 hours as before but get the IP addresses of Washington D.C. and black out that location of the U.S. for a solid week.  Or, better yet, get the upstream bandwidth providers on board for that geographic region as well and no one in Washington D.C. will have Internet access.  After two days of no access to even e-mail, they'll give up on ever trying this stunt ever again and, by day 7, they'll promise to start listening to The People instead of making bad laws.

- Left4Dead Why are zombies always eating brains? I want to see zombies that eat toes for a living. Undead-related pun intended.

Re: Thirty-Four Organizations Sign on to Letter Urging White ...

Doing something like you describe would probably backfire and make more COngressmen want something like CISPA passed.

 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Poll

How do you feel about Amazon buying Twitch?:
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician