Conflict of Interest?

Conflict of Interest? NIMF Responds to GP Queries on ESA Grant

September 30, 2008

Buried deep in last week's ESA press release which detailed a million bucks worth of grants to non-profits was word that the National Institute on Media and the Family was to be one of nine funding recipients.

NIMF is an interesting selection for the ESA, to say the least. Over the years the group has been a highly vocal, politically well-connected, and rational (in contrast to certain other critics) thorn in the side of the video game industry.

As recently as November, 2005, for example, NIMF head David Walsh, flanked by Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT), gave the ESRB an "F" on its Annual Video Game Report Card. In its 2007 report card, NIMF charged the game industry with "an ominous backslide on multiple fronts." Walsh has also worked with Hillary Clinton and other members of Congress on video game sex and violence issues.

Given NIMF's history as self-appointed media watchdog, it's more than a little surprising to see the group accept funding from the video game industry. Doing so raises obvious conflict of interest questions and GamePolitics put those issues to NIMF. Late yesterday, spokesman Darin Broton responded on behalf of the organization:

For 12 years, the Institute has been a leader in helping families maximize the benefit and minimize the harm of media. To continue our success in helping parents navigate the constantly changing technology, the Institute will work with organizations that support its mission to give parents the tools to make them even more successful. Reasonable organizations can disagree on principle, but can work together for the betterment of families and children. 

 

This isn’t the first time the Institute has worked with an organization it has been at odds with in the past. As you may recall, we worked together with the ESRB earlier this year during the release of GTA IV. The two organizations issued a joint statement telling parents to beware and follow the ESRB’s rating on the box. Where there are areas of agreement, the Institute will work with reasonable organizations to help parents and families. If the Institute has concerns with a particular issue within the gaming industry, we will respond appropriately. Nothing has changed.

Broton also told GP that the amount of the ESA grant is $50,000, but did not respond to our question as to whether NIMF approached the ESA regarding funding or vice-versa. According to the ESA press release the grant will be used to "develop an on-line e-learning zone for using the latest interactive technologies to help kids and adults understand the issues and potential areas of concern with the Internet."

GP: Broton is correct to point out that NIMF worked with ESRB on the GTA IV advisory. However, there's a wide gap between "working with" and "accepting money from." Whether one agrees or disagrees with NIMF and its mission, taking funding from the industry it purports to be watching is a credibility-damaging decision on the organization's part.

What were they thinking?

Conflict of Interest? Review Site Owned by Game P.R. Company

September 29, 2008

The owner of public relations firm which represents video game publishers also runs a video game website at which games are reviewed.

Credit Joystick Division with bringing the situation to light.

The game review site in question is GameCyte, while the P.R. firm is TriplePoint (formerly Kohnke Communications). Richard Kain (left) runs both. From Joystick Division's lengthy expose:

Richard Kain, TriplePoint PR’s General Manager and Founder, in fact formed a new company – Pantheon Labs – under TriplePoint’s roof to create GameCyte, as a way to bring “quality journalism” to the gaming media – and then deliberately concealed his ownership of Pantheon and GameCyte.com using domain privacy services like Domains By Proxy, a Joystick Division investigation indicates.

 

Then, when it came time to put together the GameCyte team, he staffed the site exclusively with TriplePoint PR employees – his former account executive the site’s most prolific reviewer. And by Mr. Kain’s own admission, some of the highest-reviewed games on GameCyte are from Telltale Games – a company he just so happens to be invested in.

Venture Beat's Dean Takahashi offers additional info:

In a phone call with me today, Kain said, “I f***ed up in terms of the degree of disclosure.” He noted that he had links to both firms on his Facebook page but neglected to disclose the ownership in the “about” page for GameCyte. Now the “about” page has been changed to include the disclosure...

 

 You can put this one down in the “major whoops” column. It’s going to be hard for people to give the PR firm the benefit of the doubt and to trust GameCyte’s reviews, given how the relationship was unearthed. But so far, it doesn’t look like anything worse than bad judgement.

GP: We linked to GameCyte twice last week on stories which added follow-up information to the Activision piracy lawsuits revealed recently on GamePolitics. Activision is not listed among Triple Point's clients.

Prominent Media Watchdog Group Among Game Biz Grant Recipients

September 29, 2008

The Entertainment Software Association, which lobbies on behalf of U.S. video game publishers, announced last week that it would award $1 million in grants to nine non-profit organizations. The money will be distributed by the organization's charitable arm, the ESA Foundation.

Most notable among the recipients is the Minneapolis-based National Institute for Media and the Family. The watchdog group, headed by Dr. David Walsh (left), is best known for its annual video game report card. At times it has been a harsh critic of the video game industry. In 2005, for example, NIMF tagged the ESRB with a failing grade in the wake of the Hot Coffee scandal.

According to an ESA press release, NIMF will receive funding to "develop an on-line e-learning zone for using the latest interactive technologies to help kids and adults understand the issues and potential areas of concern with the Internet."

GamePolitics has requested comment from NIMF.

Of the ESA Foundation grants CEO Michael Gallagher said:

We are pleased to help these organizations address such critical social issues. The creativity and commitment of these recipients gives us a glimpse into the countless ways technology, including video games, can be used to improve the quality of life of our young people.

Additional details on the grant awards are available on the ESA website. Aside from NIMF, other recipients include:

  • Animation Project, Inc.
  • HopeLab Foundation
  • PAX (not the game conference)
  • ThanksUSA
  • WGBH
  • Web Wise Kids
  • Federation of American Scientists
  • One Economy Corporation

GamePolitics ShoutBox

Posted 11/04/09 at 11:49am
Valdearg: HIS cause, however, he didn't compromise on. He didn't go, "Okay, we're only halfway oppressed now. That's good enough for me!"
Posted 11/04/09 at 11:49am
DarkSaber: Funnily enough JD, before your edit I was gonna chip in with "Because he didn't want to share the spotlight"
Posted 11/04/09 at 11:49am
JDKJ: And one for which gays in America continue to pay the price.
Posted 11/04/09 at 11:46am
JDKJ: MLK consciously decided to not include the equal rights of women or gays in his platform. Not that he didn't think those groups worthy of equal rights. He feared the dilutive effect on his own cause. That's called "a compromise."
Posted 11/04/09 at 11:46am
Valdearg: Now, at least by law, the color of your skin has no affect on any rights you are legally provided.. This is the SAME result desired by the Pro-Gay Movement. Equal Protection under the law, no matter WHO you are.
Posted 11/04/09 at 11:45am
Valdearg: Like I said. "Separate but Equal" was a compromise. Did the progressives stand for that? Nope.
Posted 11/04/09 at 11:45am
Valdearg: @JDKJ: Name ONE Civil rights compromise that wasn't overturned after it was enacted.
Posted 11/04/09 at 11:44am
JDKJ: And the sucessful ones ended up realizing the need to compromise in order to reach their objective. Ain't no other way to go.
Posted 11/04/09 at 11:43am
Valdearg: Abolition, Women's Suffrage, The Black rights movement, and now, the Gay Rights movement. THEY ALL started with a HUGE majority opposed to their ideas. Their uncompromising stand and ability to spread their ideas is what made these things happen.
Posted 11/04/09 at 11:42am
Valdearg: EVERY civil rights movement started with a small group of uncompromising progressives.
Posted 11/04/09 at 11:42am
Valdearg: *sigh* because history totally hasn't proven my point..
Posted 11/04/09 at 11:41am
JDKJ: And usually ends up watching necessary support head on down the highway.
Posted 11/04/09 at 11:39am
DarkSaber: "Our way or the highway", no wonder america never gets anything done, EVERY group says that.
Posted 11/04/09 at 11:37am
JDKJ: @Val': More power to you. It's not a strategy proven to win, but if you think it'll work . . . .
Posted 11/04/09 at 11:34am
Valdearg: And thats the goal of most Social Progressive movements. Start with a vocal minority, and continue to push until there are enough angry people to get it changed. No compromise. No getting along with those who oppose you. Our way or the highway.
Posted 11/04/09 at 11:34am
JDKJ: @Val': Because of the benefit to the Democrat party of enfranchising 12% of the American population (who've by and large remained solidly Democrat ever since)?
Posted 11/04/09 at 11:32am
DarkSaber: Yeah yeah, he did it to look good, not for some noble purpose.
Posted 11/04/09 at 11:30am
Valdearg: @JDKJ: Yes, but why would he even have thought about passing the legislation if it weren't for all of the rabble rousing the progressives did? THEY started the push, and as it grew louder and larger, LBJ couldn't ignore it.
Posted 11/04/09 at 11:29am
DarkSaber: Val, one side involved had to make compromise...
Posted 11/04/09 at 11:28am
DarkSaber: Hence you'll fail and fail hard.
Login or register to post shouts