Enter your GamePolitics username.
Enter the password that accompanies your username.
Login
Sign in using Facebook
 
Forgot your password?
Username :
Password :

Shout box

You're not permitted to post shouts.
Andrew EisenReminds me of kids in grade school who would pick on the girl they fancies because they didn't know what else to do with their feelings. Oh Sarkeesian, why are you so damn desirable? You're driving the poor love sick denizens of the internet nuts!05/06/2015 - 8:03pm
Goth_SkunkI disagree.While I have no objection to her espousing the opinion, I definitely think there's something wrong with the opinion, especially if it goes unchallenged.05/06/2015 - 8:03pm
Wonderkarpok thats just gross05/06/2015 - 8:02pm
Andrew EisenAre you sure you don't have a folder stuffed full of Sarkeesian bon mots? Come on, you can tell me. I won't judge!05/06/2015 - 8:00pm
Wonderkarpits called google :P05/06/2015 - 7:58pm
Andrew EisenI mean, goodness, unless y'll are masters at Tweet searches, I'm getting the sense that you've collected a bunch of her statements to whip out and go LOOK AT WHAT SHE SAID!!! LOOK AT IT!!! LOOOOOK!!!!!!!!05/06/2015 - 7:57pm
Andrew EisenFrankly, for the sake of y'all's blood pressure, I'd just stop following Sarkeesain on Twitter!05/06/2015 - 7:56pm
Andrew EisenYep. Again, nothing wrong with that opinion and it's an interesting perspective especially when you allow yourself to understand it. And it's still totally okay to disagree with it.05/06/2015 - 7:55pm
Matthew Wilson@Wonderkarp Idc if you like her or mot. she presented her stuff in a reasonable way, the response back has not been.05/06/2015 - 7:55pm
Goth_SkunkShe did, yes. And I find that frightening.05/06/2015 - 7:55pm
Wonderkarphere's another where she says you need a time machine to see reverse sexism http://static.fjcdn.com/pictures/Going+full+sarkeesian+apparently+anita+doesn+t+think+you+can+be_9b53fd_5371346.png05/06/2015 - 7:52pm
Andrew EisenThe original point was, despite the fact that she said something you don't agree with (which, again, is totally fine), she communicated that opinion in a reasonable and even tempered manner.05/06/2015 - 7:52pm
Goth_SkunkI don't know how any reasonable person could possibly misinterpret the statement. She's clearly saying 'Sexism against men isn't possible.' Problem is, no matter how anyone tries to justify such a statement, it's sexist.05/06/2015 - 7:51pm
Goth_Skunk"Didn't say that one couldn't..." your use of double-negatives in one sentence is confusing me. For context, this is what she said: http://ow.ly/MCIid05/06/2015 - 7:50pm
WonderkarpI would imagine any formal debate is one with 2 sides and a moderator. Debates dont have to be as glamorous as the ones you see presidential candidates do.05/06/2015 - 7:50pm
Andrew EisenEh, you don't see the distinction. Oh well.05/06/2015 - 7:50pm
Wonderkarp....Andrew, her saying Sexism against men doesnt exist is akin to saying one cant be sexist against men. If you nobody can be sexist against men, then sexism against men doesnt exist. savy?05/06/2015 - 7:49pm
Andrew EisenSorry, I thought you meant full, formal, moderated debate. (When did we film a debate? Have we ever filmed anything?)05/06/2015 - 7:49pm
Andrew EisenThere's a very important distinction here that I hope you see.05/06/2015 - 7:48pm
WonderkarpThompson would always debate. even on tv in point counterpoint https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-XtWV-tIeVg he engaged people like Adam Sessler and Lorne Lanning. Hell, Gamepolitics filmed one! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AnkJhLGoPHs05/06/2015 - 7:47pm
 

Be Heard - Contact Your Politician